Although the IASB and FASB have been striving since 2002 to achieve convergence‚ there are still many differences between the two. These differences range from revenue recognition to the matter in which the organizations receive funding. Under the IASB‚ the accrual method is the only preferred way of recognizing revenue and expenses. While FASB accepts cash basis and accrual basis; cash basis is only accepted if cash sales are less than $5 million per year. When it comes to generating funds the IASB
Premium International Financial Reporting Standards Financial Accounting Standards Board Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
and US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) have been joined and worked together on convergence project since 2002 for the purpose of combining US accounting standards and global standards into a single International financial reporting standards. This paper will discuss about the history and the relationship between International Accounting Standards Board and Financial Accounting Standards Board. It also evaluates the IASB equivalents of the FASB original pronouncements. Finally‚ this paper
Premium International Financial Reporting Standards Financial Accounting Standards Board Financial statements
Draft and related Invitation to Comment. No decisions were made. At a previous meeting‚ the Board decided to issue the FASB’s final Statement on Fair Value Measurements as an IASB Exposure Draft with an Invitation to Comment. The appendices in the FASB document dealing with consequential amendments and references to US GAAP pronouncements will be replaced with proposed consequential amendments and references to IFRSs. The Board further decided that there should be limited changes to the FASB’s document
Premium International Financial Reporting Standards Balance sheet
widely recognized that revenue is one of the most important items in financial statements and that revenue recognition is one of the most difficult issues that standard-setters and accountants have to deal with (FASB‚ 2002). There exist a variety of reasons for the emergence of the IASB-FASB joint project on revenue recognition. The most essential reason is‚ as stated in the exposure‚ that revenue recognition requirements in US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) differ from those in International
Premium International Financial Reporting Standards Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
individuals’ lives but most importantly to businesses to succeed in today’s economy. The successfulness of knowledge is through many strategies that involve knowledge creation‚ knowledge transfer and knowledge management and also by using advanced IT systems through the economic growth and change (Anantatmula and Kanungo‚ 2010). The purpose of this report is to evaluate how successful the KM strategies are in place within Apple and to evaluate how good practices are shared. Also‚ the report will show
Premium Knowledge management
debiting “Contribution Expense” and “Loss on disposal of x asset” for $2‚000 and $8‚000 crediting the asset for $10‚000. In this case‚ the fair value of my asset was lower than its book value forcing me to recognize a loss on my contribution. FASB ASC 845-10-30-1 In general‚ the accounting for nonmonetary transactions should be based on the fair values of the assets (or services) involved‚ which is the same basis as that
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Tax Taxation
Revenue recognition on FASB and IASB convergence process I. CONVERGENCE OF U.S. GAAP AND IFRS Since 2002‚ Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and International Accounting Standards Board’s (IASB) have been working toward “convergence” of US General Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). They have made significant progress in efforts to converge critical accounting standards such as those dealing with revenue recognition‚
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Balance sheet Income statement
What is the Criminal Justice System? The criminal justice system is the set of agencies and processes established by governments to control crime and impose penalties on those who violate laws. There is no single criminal justice system in the United States but rather many similar‚ individual systems. How the criminal justice system works in each area depends on the jurisdiction that is in charge: city‚ county‚ state‚ federal or tribal government or military installation. Different jurisdictions
Premium Criminal justice Police Criminal law
standard setting process of FASB and IASB Date: February 10‚ 2011 ____________________________________________________________ ______ Dear Ms.Albright‚ The FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) and IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) are making progress towards convergence in setting better accounting standards. However‚ there exist some differences between their standard setting processes. After weighing the pros and cons‚ I suggest that FASB standard setting approach would
Premium
The History of the Jury System The jury system has been around for thousands of years. In fact‚ the concept of it can be traced to Athens‚ Greece as far back as around 400 B.C. Being centuries old it is understandable that the jury system developed to what many people understand as today’s jury systems. Early jury systems had different roles than the roles of today’s juries. The earliest system documented did hear the arguments in legal cases‚ however they did not have a say in the legal actions
Premium Jury Law Court