Cultural relativism is the moral theory that states that morality is created together by many individual groups of humans and morality therefore is not fixed‚ but rather varies from culture to culture‚ peoples‚ and different contextual situations. Cultural relativism preaches that certain practices are always morally permissible for a culture as long as the members of the culture see it as morally right. For example if a culture has a traditional custom that believes it’s okay for them to eat the
Premium Morality Ethics Cultural relativism
all groups and in practically all individuals. Nearly every person is ethnocentric most likely without intention because we all assume things about other people’s ways. It is hard to understand what we don’t know or aren’t used to; therefore we base our judgments on our own ways‚ because that is what works for us. Contrary to ethnocentrism‚ cultural relativity allows for the understanding of variations among culture and was brought on in response to ethnocentrism. It is the notion that an individual
Premium Cultural relativism Ethnocentrism Culture
the case of relativism‚ we can simply say that your opinion is true and mine too and nothing being wrong with that. On the other hand‚ ethical absolutism tells us that there is an objective moral code and that certain of our actions as humans are necessarily right or wrong. What would happen if we say two contradictory statements can’t coexist as Aristotle demonstrated? Through the law of non-contradiction from Aristotle and ethical absolutism‚ I will argue against ethical relativism. In ethical
Premium Morality Ethics Relativism
Cultural relativism can be defined as the understanding that the choices one can consider morally right are those approved of by one’s culture. Cultural differences in moral beliefs don’t imply cultural relativism because nonmoral beliefs can alter the perspective of basic moral principles shared by the culture. This would imply that there are no universally set/correct moral standards. Saying that cultural differences in moral beliefs imply cultural relativism is only part of an argument‚ not a
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant
Moral Realism v. Moral Relativism In the movie The Dark Knight‚ Batman is faced with a new challenge—dealing with the Joker. Batman‚ and the city of Gotham‚ views the Joker as a mysterious‚ sadistic criminal who is a freak of nature. However‚ the challenge becomes very personal for Batman as the Joker confronts Batman about everything he believes in. The Joker does this because he has a very relativistic view on life. Even though he murders innocent people‚ tortures others for amusement‚ and manipulates
Premium Morality Relativism
Thoreau would have thought that the government should preserve the liberty of citizens because of all his references to people’s freedom. He constantly brings up the fact that he thinks the government shouldn’t control everything the people do. He wants the people to be in control of themselves and by doing this‚ it would make everyone happier which would result in a more calm environment for the government. If the citizens are happy‚ then the government won’t have to deal with all the drama of people
Premium Political philosophy Government Sociology
Many neoconservatives were horrified at the extreme relativism that had grown in the 1960s. Simplistic ideas such as “it’s all right if it feels good” and “it just depends on your point of view” and “multiculturalism”-drove professors who had earlier tried to broaden their students’ views by stressing the relativity of all view points and cultures. Instead‚ students became vacuous rather than enlightened. In the Bush43 administration‚ highly placed neocons promoted war with Iraq both to protect the
Premium Liberalism Conservatism United States
that can be universally applied to all peoples at all times). The only moral standards against which a society’s practices can be judged are its own. If ethical relativism is correct‚ there can be no common framework for resolving moral disputes or for reaching agreement on ethical matters among members of different societies. Ethical relativism is not a consequentialist ethical theory. Analyzing the violence and war issue under the scope of this ethical theory has many ways to be seen. In ancient societies
Premium Alexander the Great Chandragupta Maurya English-language films
beliefs and do not always agree with one another in what is true and what is not. From television‚ to Internet and newspapers we get to read what surround us‚ what is happening in our every day life‚ but what are we reading and watching is it trustworthy? Can they tell us what is true or false? People disagree about many issues presented to them for example what is said in religion to what science proves and so on. This is where cultural relativism comes in‚ morally is correct to the beliefs and ethics
Premium Morality Ethics Religion
RELATIVISM AND MORALITY Lenn Goodman offers a very good argument about his idea of the things that are wrong. I agree with his argument that four of the things that we should look to in whatever being we worship are “(1) genocide‚ politically induced famine‚ and germ warfare; (2) terrorism‚ hostage taking‚ and child warriors; (3) slavery‚ polygamy‚ and incest; and (4) rape and female genital cutting.” (Goodman‚ Project Muse‚ pg 88) When Goodman talks about genocide‚ famine‚ and germ warfare
Premium Terrorism Human Violence