background behind the start of the war with Iraq and then examine the rationale of both the pro and con side of this determination. In the following arguments‚ this paper will concentrate not on security issues as much as whether the war was morally justified. On January 17‚ 1991 the United States spear headed a coalition of countries in an intervention into Iraq after Iraqi forces invaded Kuwait. Although‚ this venture was successful from the standpoint that Iraq withdrew from Kuwait‚ Iraq soon ceased
Free Iraq War United States 2003 invasion of Iraq
to the nation in isolation and were extended out‚ here in the interests of the state violence would be justified both in protecting its own interests and in civilizing others. In the ever more global world 18th century European nations traded through North Africa as part of this growing globalised economy. Owing to problems with Algeria in the form of piracy they attempted negotiations‚ when non-violent attempts at agreement were unsuccessful they made the decision of taking over Algeria through
Premium Europe Colonialism Africa
Race-based affirmative action is justifiable in order to increase diversity. While many adversaries criticize the notion that there is a collective responsibility of society to make up for past wrong-doings‚ this argument focuses only on promoting diversity. In colleges‚ having a diverse‚ mixed student body allows students to learn from a wide range of backgrounds. It also helps disadvantaged minorities reach higher leadership positions which would then help the general populations of those minorities
Premium Black people Racism Affirmative action
Russia had influence over outer Mongolia‚ and the United States had influence in Japan and control over the Philippines‚ gained from the Spanish-American War. 8. The Europeans justified imperialism by claiming that they had a mission to civilize the uncivilized populations of the places
Premium Europe United States Asia
Is it ever ethically justified to torture a terrorist to save millions of innocent lives‚ or is it always unjustifiable to torture a person? Imagine one summer day when all the news stations broadcast a message saying that a terrorist has planted a nuclear bomb in New York City and that the bomb will detonate in approximately one hour and two million civilians will parish. The news then says that the terrorist has been captured‚ but the only way to find out the key information to stop the detonation
Premium September 11 attacks Terrorism Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
William Shakespeare the conspirators (Brutus‚ Cassius‚ Casca…) feel Julius Caesar isn’t the best ruler for Rome. They have a very horrid plan to get rid of him for good. The real question is were the conspirators justified or not? In Williams play‚ the conspirators are definitely justified in killing Caesar because of his ambitious power and physical weakness. He was not fit to be the ruler of Rome. During act one and act two Brutus and Cassius have a tragic plan to kill Caesar because they think
Premium Julius Caesar Roman Republic Augustus
fifteen innocent men. Justice is important to regulating actions and preserving virtue in society. In some cases murder can be justified (such as self defense)‚ but in the case of Captain Oram‚ fifteen accounts of first-degree murder cannot. Captain Oram’s cowardice hasty judgment‚ and no one’s right to play God caused the death of these men. Captain Oram is not justified for the deaths of fifteen of his men. Captain Oram was a cowardice leader who led to the deaths if fifteen innocent men. He
Premium Decision making Decision theory Decision making software
Was the U.S justified in their Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb? Before WWII‚ the United States strongly supported the idea of Isolationism‚ meaning they did not want to be involved in wars. As the time passed the United States found them turning away from neutrality by providing armed weapons to other nations. When other countries could not afford to buy products‚ the U.S could not afford to lose business‚ so they came up with a Lend-Lease Act and Cash and Carry. Both selling and lending items
Premium Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki World War II United States
Was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified? I have carefully selected six different sources which are either for or against the USA dropping the bombs on Japan. I have tried to find ones which support or oppose the dropping for their own separate reason. Source 4 is against the dropping of the bomb. It is an eye-witness account from a five year old girl; I think this is a reliable source because a five year old girl has no reason to lie about the events. It is sad because a girl of that age
Premium United States President of the United States Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Oppression has been justified by many governments throughout history. Governments often justify oppression of their people through laws which are passed for “the betterment of society.” A prime example of oppression justified by “bettering the society” are the policies of the Russian Dictator‚ Joseph Stalin. Stalin believed in order to survive as a whole the russian people must work to increase economic standing against advanced capitalist nations. Stalin’s speech entitled “The Need For Progress”
Premium Communism Soviet Union Marxism