Case Study: Nike * 1. Friedman Approach: Friedman believes that the only responsibility of the company is the increase of its profits for itself and its shareholders so long as it engages in free and open competition without deception and fraud. NIKE CASE: To shave cost‚ Nike outsources all manufacturing and cost savings go to marketing which aims at increasing sales revenue; achieve maximization of profits. No responsibility so long as Nike operates legally. However‚ as Nike went under
Premium Stakeholder Law Corporate social responsibility
Nike is one of the largest corporations in the athletic apparel‚ footwear and equipment industry. The company’s headquarters is located in Beaverton‚ Oregon and the current President/CEO is Mark Parker (Nike‚ 2014). It was founded in 1964 under the name Blue Ribbon Sports by Phil Knight and Bill Bowerman. The founders’ goal was to produce quality running shoes and the business began by selling the shoes at track events. In 1971 the company changed its name to Nike‚ which means Greek goddess of
Premium Marketing Apple Inc. Steve Jobs
MARKETING MANAGEMENT STUDY CASE FOOTBALL BETWEEN NIKE AND ADIDAS INTENSIFIES OFF PITCH Feriani (0000006978) Teguh Prabowo (0000006985) A. Executive Summary Nowadays the revolution of the football boot has taken a dramatic shift. The battle of the brands has begun and it is claimed ‘football will never be the same again’. That was the bold statement delivered by Nike‚ who countered the release from rivals Adidas. Just hours ahead of the American sports giants’ multi-million
Premium Customer Customer service Brand
factors for the first NIKE-i2 ERP-SCM implementation? All ERP implementations have risks associated that can lead to failure situations. The complexity of ERP systems together with demanding business environment‚ represent big challenges for companies when implementing an ERP. In the case of Nike‚ the situation is even more challenging because of the worldwide ERP deployment‚ and the large and complex scope of the project. Inevitably‚ and like all ERP implementations‚ Nike-i2’s project faced complications
Premium Enterprise resource planning
Competition As a leader of the sports and athletic apparel industry‚ Nike competes directly with Adidas‚ Under Armor‚ Puma‚ and New Balance for market share and position. Nike is currently the top producer in this industry. Currently‚ Nike holds 53.94% of the market. Nike currently owns close to 700 retail stores‚ and they sell their products to more than 23‚000 distributors worldwide. Nike aims to generate $28 to $38 billion in revenue by 2015 through their continued sales of their most popular
Premium United States Athletic shoe Adidas
Corporate Sustainability is Attainable: NIKE Case Study SUS 500 A1 - Principles of Sustainability October 17‚ 2010 Abstract Nike‚ Inc. is one of the world’s largest manufacturers and brands of athletic apparel‚ shoes‚ and equipment. The company has undergone a revolution in the past decade. They have gone from a risk management‚ philanthropic and compliance model to a long-term strategy focused on innovation‚ collaboration‚ transparency‚ and advocacy. This paper discusses the goals of Nike’s
Premium Sustainability
and contrasting is both Nike and Adidas sportswear companies. Whose products throughout many parts of the world are very popular and have been the top two leading sport companies in the sport industry. The purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast Nike and Adidas companies in terms of headquarters‚ market focus‚ sponsorships‚ marketing and advertising‚ price and product. Nike and Adidas are the most popular sporting attires out in the clothing and equipment market. Nike and Adidas offer people
Premium Sport Athletic shoe Nike, Inc.
purchase Nike products. This shows you that Nike’s image is one of the most viable and important aspects for their company’s success. Which would leave to the following aspects of customer satisfaction‚ because without that I could potentially ruin Nike’s positive image that they strive so much for. Another factor that plays into this positive image would be advertising. Advertising is an important factor because helps the company showcase their “consumer-aimed” designs to the public. “Nike recently
Premium Advertising Graphic design Sweatshop
Swot analysis NIKE 1. Strenghts: -Low manufacturing cost since the manufacturing chain comes from south Asia were labor costs are low. -Since Nike does not own the physical factories‚ production can be switch to another location if necessary. -Nike wass worth 15 billion in 2011. They have a strong position in the shoe market. For example their gem ’’Just do it" has been recognized worldwide. - High return on equity up to 24.5 % in 1993. Although the return on equity was 21.41 %‚ it still
Premium Brand Supply and demand Minimum wage
Introduction This paper is a based on a case study of Nike. The paper will be discussing legal and ethical analysis and how the impact the operational/ ethical issues of the organization‚ the paper shall also be discussing the contribution factors and how the company’s corporate culture may have helped to minimize the unethical behavior or actually contributed to/caused the unethical behavior. The paper is also going to provide ethical decision factors‚ which are going to address or going to be
Premium Ethics