In Lang v James Morrison & Co Ltd (1912) 13 CLR 1‚ an action was brought by an English company‚ James Morrison & Co Ltd‚ against three defendants‚ J McFarland‚ T Lang and W Keates. The plaintiffs carried on the business of receiving and disposing of frozen meat from abroad. They alleged that the three defendants carried on business in Melbourne as partners under the names ‘T McFarland & Co’ and on occasions ‘McFarland‚ Lang and Keates’. Before the action commenced‚ J McFarland and W Keates became
Premium Plaintiff Complaint Pleading
Chapter 2 The Court System N.B.: TYPE indicates that a question is new‚ modified‚ or unchanged‚ as follows. N A question new to this edition of the Test Bank. + A question modified from the previous edition of the Test Bank. = A question included in the previous edition of the Test Bank. TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS 1. Laws would be meaningless without the courts to interpret and apply them. ANSWER: T PAGES: Section 1 TYPE: + BUSPROG: Analytic AICPA: BB-Legal 2. The federal courts are superior
Premium Trial court Appeal Civil procedure
Warfield v. Hicks‚ 91 N.C.App. 1‚ 4‚ 8‚ 370 S.E.2d 689‚ 691‚ 693 (1988). Finally‚ the Court found dismissal of a fraud claim was appropriate because the following statements were not sufficiently specific: Plaintiff complains that Defendant Popp falsely represented “the potential for sales from Popp’s Charlotte office‚” “the quality of yarn produced by Clemson‚” and “the availability of customers for Clemson Yarn.” Each of these categories‚ however‚ necessarily implies a statement of opinion‚ including
Premium Law Jury Appeal
Question 7 In this question‚ it sets out the following issues in relation to the rescuers and the psychiatric illness caused by the accident‚ including i) whether Samantha and Eric‚ as rescuers and primary victims‚ would be entitled to damages caused by the accident; ii) whether Susan‚ as a secondary victim‚ would satisfied the requirements in order to claim the damages; iii) whether Julie‚ as a primary victim‚ would be entitled to damages caused by the accident. i) whether Samantha and Eric
Premium Tort law Tort Law
Legal Memorandum on Rogers v. Wycoff case From: Jamshid AKHMEDOV To: Therese KEELAGHAN Date: November 5‚ 2012 1) Relevant facts: Defendant: Edward Wycoff‚ 40 Defense attorney: Defendant acts as his own attorney Victims: Julie Rogers‚ 47 and Paul Rogers‚ 47 Plaintiff attorney: Deputy District Attorney Mark Peterson Witness (also a Victim): Victims’ son Eric Rogers‚ 20 Witness’ attorney: Tedd W. Cassman Judge: Contra Costa County Superior Court Judge John W
Premium United States Jury Civil procedure
residents of Middletown‚ NY need root canals or any other restorative or general dentistry procedures‚ they call the father-daughter dental practice Gunther B Goldsmith‚ DDS and Ellen J Solomon‚ DMD. The skilled dentists at this Middletown-based practice often perform root canals on their patients‚ so they know that there are several indicators that you might need this type of restorative dentistry procedure. Here Dr. Goldsmith and
Premium Dentistry Oral hygiene Dental caries
thus retribution encompasses the notion that the punishment should fit the crime. This is the most important factor of sentencing. The judge or magistrate has to consider the particular sentence to provide for the accused. THE CRIMES (SENTENCING PROCEDURES) ACT 1999 (NSW) lays down the allowable purpose of sentencing in s 3A of the act‚ this act is cost efficient to society and requires no additional resources to enforce its guidelines. An example of the purpose of punishment incapacitation‚ deterrence
Premium Crime Prison Criminal justice
SAFETY CIRCULAR ON SAFE WORK PROCEDURES OSD/SC002/2000 By Occupational Safety and Health Division Ministry of Manpower ♦ Identification of Hazards and Injuries Before any work specified in the Twelfth INTRODUCTION Schedule is carried out‚ the potential Safe work procedures are sequence of hazards to which persons could be exposed plan of actions‚ in consistent with the at the workplace must be identified. The generally accepted safe and sound practice‚ injuries and
Premium Occupational safety and health Safety
Michael Menor Professor Cady English 151 25 February 2013 Submarine Escape Procedures There are many catastrophes that can affect the operation of a submarine; fire and flooding can crimple a submarine completely if either is not resolved quickly. Submariners are trained to combat all forms of fire and flooding in different scenarios that are closely monitored in Submarine School. As a last resort‚ sailors are also trained in submarine escape in the very rare occasion that they must escape
Premium Submarine
14 July 2014 SUBJECT: Unit Substance Abuse Program Standing Operating Procedures (SOP) Purpose This Standing Operating Procedure (SOP) is a Unit specific substance abuse program for the . Drug and alcohol abuse are not compatible with military service and every effort should be made to eliminate the abuse of alcohol and other drugs within this Command through prevention and treatment. This SOP and the references listed below will be used when conducting all urinalysis collections‚ drug and
Premium Army Management Military