UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION In re: BAMBI A. HERRERA-EDWARDS‚ Case No. 8:12-bk-15725-KRM Chapter 11 Debtor. / MOTION TO DETERMINE PROPERTY OF THE ESTATE DUE TO CLAIMS OF EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL‚ PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL AND RES JUDICATA Creditor‚ ERIC MOORE does hereby file this motion to determine property of the estate and alleges as follows: FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 1. Creditor‚ Eric Moore and Debtor‚ Bambi A. Herrera-Edwards entered into
Premium Legal terms Civil procedure Royalties
Case Name‚ Citation‚ and Court: TRACO‚ INC.‚ A THREE RIVERS ALUMINUM COMPANY‚ Appellant v. ARROW GLASS CO.‚ INC.‚ Appellee Appeal No. 04-90-00382-CV COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS‚ Fourth District‚ San Antonio Key Facts Traco Inc is an aluminum company that supplies pre-engineered aluminum and glass sliding doors and windows. Arrow Glass Company is a subcontractor who initially brought suit against Traco on the theories of promissory estoppel and negligence for Traco’s failure to supply aluminum
Premium Law Jury Appeal
Michelle Vandeprool March 10‚ 2013 SPD 616 IEP Case Study Review Hurry v. Jones Having reviewed the case Hurry V. Jones 734 F.2d 879 (1st Cir. 1984)‚ at first reading of the case and with my novice awareness of the law I am seriously concerned as to why this ever went to court. IDEA and the constitution of the United States guarantee that students will receive a free public education no matter what their handicaps. The District should have provided some method by which
Premium Education Lawsuit Dispute resolution
According to Gopal Sri Ram in the case of Low Lee Lian v Ban Hin Lee Banking‚ the second category where the ‘cause to the contrary’ might be established is where the chargor could established that the chargee had failed to meet the conditions precedent for the right to seek order for sale. The first circumstances where the aggrieved person can say that the chargee fails to meet the conditions to seek the order for sale is when the statutory notice of demand served was defective or improper.
Premium Plaintiff Civil procedure Defendant
|Objective | TO BE A PART OF AN ORGNIZATION WHERE I CAN MYSELF IN TERMS OF KNOWLEDGE AND CAREER‚ THUS ENABLING THE ORGNIZATION TO IMPROVE ITS GROWTH AND SET NEW STANDARDS. |Education |
Premium PHP Programming language Microsoft
EN BANC [G.R. No. L-9396. August 16‚ 1956.] MANILA MOTOR COMPANY‚ INC.‚ Plaintiff-Appellee‚ vs. MANUEL T. FLORES‚ Defendant-Appellant. BENGZON‚ J.: Facts: In May 1954‚ Manila Motor Company filed in the Municipal Court of Manila a complaint to recover from Manuel T. Flores the amount of P1‚047.98 as chattel mortgage installments which fell due in September 1941. Defendant pleaded prescription:chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary 1941 to 1954. The complaint was dismissed. On appeal‚ the Court of
Free Law Civil procedure Appeal
Sterling computer has entered into a partnership with NoBugs a microchip processing computer. The collaboration was developing into a something successful until an incident put a strain in the business relationship. Some month ago Sterling computer has had several of their computers explode shortly after customers install them. Upon an investigation which was conducted by Sterling researchers have discovered evidence of NoBugs’s microchips aggravating a dormant defect in their computers‚ causing
Premium Contract Civil procedure Lawsuit
Business law 1101 ATRA Professor. Waller 10/20/14 Hamer V.S. Sidway Facts: William E. Story promised his nephew William E. Story I I $5‚000 under the condition that the nephew refrains from drinking‚ using tobacco‚ gambl ing‚ and swearing until he turned 21. When William E. Story II turned 21‚ his uncle sent him a letter saying he earned the money‚ When the nephew turned 21 the uncle said he would hold the mone y with interest until the nephew became capable of taking care of it responsibly
Premium Appeal Law Contract
Week 3 – Learning Team Reflection Team names LAW/531 Date Teacher A counselor job or purpose is to identify the strength and weakness that is in a case. Every case is different; some have great damages with huge liability problems‚ while others are in a reverse condition. In addition‚ a counselor can also provide an insight on other similar cases. It never hurts to have all the information needed to make the best choice. All in all‚ it is important to know how to evaluate a case the right
Premium Civil procedure Trial
Citation: KILARJIAN v. VASTOLA‚ 877 A.2d 372 (2004)‚ Superior Court of New Jersey‚ Chancery Division‚ Somerset County. Decided December 17‚ 2004. Facts: On March 18‚ 2004‚ plaintiff’s‚ Carol Kilarjian and Dave de Castro‚ and defendants‚ John Vastola and Joan Vastola‚ entered into a contract for the sale of 136 East Cliff St.‚ Somerville. The final date was scheduled for June 15‚ 2004. On June 14‚ 2004‚ defendant’s real estate attorney wrote plaintiff’s attorney stating that defendants had elected
Premium Plaintiff Defendant Complaint