Introduction A law is an obligatory rule of conduct imposed and enforced by the sovereign[1]. Therefore the law is the body of principles recognized and enforced by the state in the application of justice. The law is mainly made by a parliament‚ a legislative body given power by the constitution to draft law. However in the last few decades there has been a notion that judges make law.A judge is a public official appointed or elected to hear and decide legal matters in court[2]‚ Judges exercise
Free Common law Law Precedent
What is Shark Finning? Why is it such a vicious practice and why do people do it? Shark Finning is an atrocious practice of cutting off the shark’s fins and tossing the shark‚ still alive‚ back to the water; this practice is illegal but it is practiced anyways and it’s quite serious as some shark are in the edge of extinction. Once the fins have been cut off‚ the shark is thrown back to the water and it slowly dies. The shark may either drown‚ bleed to death or be eaten by other creatures
Premium Shark Shark fin soup
judge-made law‚ for the judges do not make the law‚ though they frequently have to apply existing law to circumstances as to which it has not previously been authoritatively laid down that such law is applicable.” Generally‚ the position judges adopted is to interpret the law instead of concerning with the justice of their decisions. In modern tie‚ there is still existence of powerful ideology that denies any creative role to judges. The popular view of the judges is not to give the judge a law-making
Free Common law Precedent Stare decisis
“Why I Enrolled in Law School” The failure‚ the decision‚ and the belief to enroll in law school was a journey in-and-of itself. A journey I am happy to have taken thus far. Since childhood I have been advocate for fairness‚ understanding‚ compromise‚ and justice. As the youngest of five children keeping peace in our house usually meant me at the middle of negotiations; you might call this early training. However‚ life has a way of imbedding restrictions on an individual’s beliefs of what he or
Premium Question Law Education
Since the question social control theorists ask‚ as indicated above‚ is why do people obey the law‚ they answer this vital question by saying that people obey the law because their behavior is controlled by a combination of internal and external forces. In other words‚ they state that juveniles who stay out of trouble have been properly socialized‚ and they have strong ties to society. Social bond theory‚ proposed by Hirschi in 1969‚ links delinquency to a weakening of the bonds that tie people to
Premium Crime Criminology Criminal justice
contrasted with an employee in a small company who must be a wide specialist because of enough people lack. But if a person concentrates on the narrow area of anything he will be able to be a great professional in such field. If anyone has to be an economist‚ an engineer and a secretary at the same time he will never be the valuable professional. I think that the purposeful man could achieve the gorgeous results either in a small company or in a big one. But I suppose that the work in the huge corporation
Premium Corporation Employment Company
The effect of white supremacists in favor of anti-miscegenation laws White supremacists believe that white people have higher status than other races(Simi‚ Blee‚ DeMichele & Windisch‚ 2017‚ p. 1167). They do not want to marry other races because they have racial superiority. For this reason‚ they support anti-miscegenation laws. The anti-miscegenation laws are a series of laws were launched in America’s history. These laws focus on limiting white people mix breeding with other races(Gevrek‚ 2014
Premium Race Racism United States
judges were to make law then they would be contradicting this doctrine. The legislative supremacy disqualifies the courts power to review the validity of legislation‚ refer to British Railway Board v Pickin . The objective of judges is to not make law but simply declare what the law had always been. Acts of Parliament are the highest form of authority and the courts hands are tied by it. But through the doctrine of precedent‚ the judicial function of declaring and applying the law has a ‘quasi-legislative
Premium Common law Law Appeal
University of London Common Law Reasoning Institutions Essay Title: “There can be no real argument about it: judges make law. The declaratory theory is more or less nonsense.” Student Number: 120448995 Candidate Number: 150573 Historically there are lots of arguments by the philosophers and the critics that judges make law or not. Actually judges are meant only to interpret the law. This can be seen that somehow they are making law but the question arises whether this is lawful
Premium Common law Stare decisis Judge
judge-made law is a law rooted in a judiciary decision‚ not an act of legislation made by lawmakers or a regulation created by a government agency with the legal authority to do so. The collective body of judge-made laws in a nation is also known as case law. Many nations allow judges to set legal precedents when making high court decisions‚ adding to the body of law in a nation and providing new interpretation of existing laws. Lower courts do not have the authority to make judge-made law. Only judges
Premium Law Common law Lawyer