corruption. Whistle blowers can make the allegations internally Whistle blowing refers to the unauthorized disclosure of the unethical‚ illegal and corrupt practices by an employee to protect the public interest. The concept whistle blowing has taken an important stand in the competitive world both in public and private sector. There are 3 conditions that must hold for whistle blowing to be morally permissible‚ and 2 other conditions that must hold for it to be morally obligatory. Whistle Blowing Conditions:
Premium Management Ethics Business ethics
Normative theory and whistle-blowing Introduction Whistle-blowing in this context is the act‚ for an employee‚ disclosing what he believes to be an unethical or illegal behaviour to higher management (internal whistle-blowing) or to an external authority or the public (external whistle-blowing). Examples of unethical acts include sexual harassment and racial discrimination at work while illegal act include the accounting fraud by the Arthur-Andersen accountants for Enron (Sims & Brinkmann 2003)
Premium Ethics Normative ethics
Some of the most important things we will be confronted with while doing an internship is ethics‚ responsibility and accountability. Gorden Borrie‚ in his article‚ “Blowing the Whistle: Business Ethics and Accountability” helps one to understand the importance between the law and morality and whether or not an organization should be left to self-regulate. In this article there are two examples of agencies that failed in accountability and the consequences were devastating. The first is the Zeebrugge
Premium Business ethics Ethics Morality
Is abortion morally justifiable? The issue concerning abortion is considered to divide many individuals‚ it tends to be fought over the point in which a foetus (an unborn human baby more than eight weeks after conception) becomes an independent life that has its own values: before birth or after conception. “To my mind life begins at the moment of conception‚ and to suggest otherwise seems to me just the sort of casuistry which an anti-Papist might describe as fesuitical. (Incidentally‚ I am
Free Pregnancy Abortion Fetus
Does Blowing the Whistle Violate Company Loyalty? Employees have moral obligations to respect the property of the corporation‚ to abide by employment" onmouseover="window.status = ’goto: employment’;return 1" onmouseout="window.status=’’">employment contracts‚ and to operate within the bounds of the company’s procedural rules. However‚ the duty of loyalty is not absolute. That an employee should be loyal is a prima facie duty. The object of the employee’s duty must be deserving if the duty is genuine
Premium Business ethics Employment Ethics
generated by increased awareness of the ethical conflicts encountered at work. Whistle blowers sound the alarm from within the very organization in which they work‚ aiming to spotlight neglect or abuses that threaten the public interest. The stakes in whistleblowing are high‚ whistle blowers pose a threat to those whom they denounce and their own careers are at risk. Sissela Bok acknowledges that blowing the whistle is often justified but that in doing so the individual creates dissent‚ conflict and breaches
Premium Morality Ethics
Whistle blowing is known as ‘when an employee reports some wrongdoing to people that have the authority to take correct action‚ the wrongdoing is usually a disobedience of the rules and is a threat to the public interest through fraud‚ corruptions and so on’.(www.wikipedia.org). The Public Disclosure Act 1998 came into effect in 1998. Employees were hesitant to speak up about wrongdoing because they were afraid that they would not be listened to or that they would be putting their jobs at risk. The
Premium Employment Political corruption
fish. The sailor dies and the cook butchers and eats him. Pi and his mother try to stop him. He kills Pi’s mother and throws her head towards Pi. Later Pi fights the cook and kills him in a moment of revenge and self preservation Was Pi’s act morally justified? As moral arguments are best proven by analogies‚ let us consider four people in the same situation but a different setting. Four strangers (namely A‚B‚C‚D) are stuck in a lifeboat. A has a gun and decides to kill B (who was already injured
Premium Religion English-language films Ocean
When Committing Murder is Morally Justified There are many occasions when murders are committed and murderers are not brought to justice. In And Then There Were None and Murder on the Orient Express by Agatha Christie the theme in the books is‚ the morality of murder - that murder can be right and morally justified. Both books illustrate that murders took place and that the individuals that committed theses murders got away with them. As a result‚ the surviving family‚ friends and others such
Premium Agatha Christie Murder Jury
background behind the start of the war with Iraq and then examine the rationale of both the pro and con side of this determination. In the following arguments‚ this paper will concentrate not on security issues as much as whether the war was morally justified. On January 17‚ 1991 the United States spear headed a coalition of countries in an intervention into Iraq after Iraqi forces invaded Kuwait. Although‚ this venture was successful from the standpoint that Iraq withdrew from Kuwait‚ Iraq soon
Free Iraq War United States 2003 invasion of Iraq