Nike: The Sweatshop Debate MGT/448 May 31‚ 2010 Instructor: Adrianne Ford Nike: The Sweatshop Debate The purpose and intent of this paper is to describe the legal‚ cultural‚ and ethical challenges that face the Nike Corporation in their global business ventures. This paper will also touch on the roles of the host government and countries where Nike manufactures their products and the author will summarize the strategic and operational challenges that Nike managers face in globalization of
Premium Corporate social responsibility Social responsibility Manufacturing
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Case Study about the CSR of Nike prepared by Paul SOMER TABLE OF CONTENTS • Background of the implementation of CSR at Nike (besides the existing legal commitment) • Activities of Nike regarding CSR • Responsibility by impementing the Environmental Apparel Design Tool • • Nike Responsibility Governance Conclusion and future prospects BACKGROUND FOR CSR OF NIKE • In 1992 it became public that Nike produces in Indonesia at minimum wages • Strike in the production
Premium Social responsibility Minimum wage Corporate social responsibility
Running head: Nike and the Sweatshop Debate Nike the Sweatshop Debate Shelia D. Marshall Global Strategies MGT 448 Shabbir Karim October 12‚ 2009 Nike the Sweatshop Debate Beneath all the hoopla and controversy about Nike being a successful company in the United States in which its earnings in 2009 according to Hoovers Inc.‚ 2009‚ Nike’s revenue for 2009 was $19‚ 176.1 million and their gross profit was $8‚604.4 million‚ made possible by the hands of women and underage workers
Premium Corporate social responsibility Sweatshop Social responsibility
April. 2014 Most of the Nike products provide excellent proof of their product’s use. For example Nike has an advertisement that features Usain Bolt advertising Nike’s shoes and Gatorade. Besides Usain Bolt‚ there is a cheetah which symbolizes speed of the shoe which he races the cheetah across Africa’s wild to also represent the endurance of the shoes. He also drinks a Gatorade to rebuild stamina and starts the race again. The advertisers of the Nike advertisement appeal to the everyday
Premium Usain Bolt Advertising Regulatory Focus Theory
Nike vs Puma Easily the biggest grudge match in Germany this month will not be between two of the countries competing‚ but between homegrown Adidas and‚ of course‚ American arch-rivals Nike. The business media is already hot on the Stripes versus the Swoosh‚ with the German brand reportedly splashing out double Nike’s estimated £60m World Cup marketing spend. But what about the shirts themselves? Which ones would you want to play in‚ and which should be left on the backs of the die-hards down the
Premium Nike, Inc. Germany Middle East
A Cultural Study and Political Ecology of Nike Partially excerpted from Petrina‚ S. (2001). The political ecology of design and technology education: An inquiry into methods. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 10‚ 207-237. When we put our comfortable shoes on in the morning and take a step‚ our steps are always already scripted within powerful cultural processes. Shoes‚ no more so than the apparel covering our bodies‚ happen to provide particularly robust examples of how
Premium Nike, Inc. Michael Jordan Athletic shoe
Just Do It "Nike"‚ is it for everyone? Every athlete? Or every soccer player? This particular Nike advertisement is trying to bring excitement and passion to the viewer. It is trying to bring the viewer to a state of mind in which he or she is really "pumped". Where the viewer can fully understand and intake the broad yet specific message that can directed to every athlete‚ soccer player and your average Joe. When looking at this advertisement the viewer is able to notice that there are three
Premium Marketing Nike, Inc. Advertising
Nike Debate Business Aspect: ⦁ Nike is a business and their priority is to minimize cost and maximize revenue for its public shareholders ⦁ COUNTER AGRUMENT: Instead of attacking Nike‚ protest against taxes and regulations that lower the firms return on invested capital‚ leading to lower wages for the employees? (mise.org) ⦁ COUNTER AGRUMENT:Why dont we make Nike shoes in America? Shoe business in the U.S. has been non profitable since 1984. Nike had two factories in Maine and New Hampshire but
Premium United States Economics Athletic shoe
Case Study: Nike * 1. Friedman Approach: Friedman believes that the only responsibility of the company is the increase of its profits for itself and its shareholders so long as it engages in free and open competition without deception and fraud. NIKE CASE: To shave cost‚ Nike outsources all manufacturing and cost savings go to marketing which aims at increasing sales revenue; achieve maximization of profits. No responsibility so long as Nike operates legally. However‚ as Nike went under
Premium Stakeholder Law Corporate social responsibility
but a rare pair of late 1970s Nike track racing shoes called Nike Vainqueur‚ and this wasn’t just an ordinary occasion to me either‚ for these old shoes of mine were to be worn that day for the first time in nearly 30 years by my 16 year old son Jeremy. I think we were both a little nervous that morning as we both prepared for him to race in his first athletics carnival at his new high school. My very first pair of Nike running shoes were a bright blue pair of Nike Waffle trainers which I wore
Premium Athletic shoe Shoe High school