Major Case Study – Sexual Harassment April 9‚ 2014 I. Case: Leigh Sosebee‚ Plaintiff‚ v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission‚ Defendant II. Facts of the Case The plaintiff‚ Leigh Sosebee‚ filed a suite with the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission that she was discriminated against because of her sex and retaliation. Sosebee filed the lawsuit in September of 2011 after being an employee since 2007. Sosebee complained of the sexual harassment in 2009 claiming her direct sergeant and other
Premium Sexual harassment Employment Bullying
Congress commissioned John Trumbull‚ in 1817 John Trumbull‚ in 1817‚ to paint a series of paintings including “General George Washington Resigning His Commission (WRHC)” (“Commission” n.d.‚ 2016‚ para 1). The painting depicts George Washington resigning his military commission before the Continental Congress in Annapolis‚ Maryland (“Annapolis” n.d.‚ para 1). However‚ Trumbull created WRHC in 1824 and placed it in 1826 (“Comission” n.d.). The year 1824 was an election year: Jackson v. Adams. Jackson
Premium United States American Revolution United States Declaration of Independence
Your Texas Benefits: Form Please use dark ink. Please print. If you need more room‚ add pages. ) like this Fill in the circles ( Section A Mark the benefits anyone on your case is applying for: ● Your Facts If you’re applying to get SNAP food benefits‚ the first month’s amount will be based on the date we get pages 1 and 2. Other benefits also are based on when we get pages 1 and 2. Food Benefits (SNAP) Cash Help for Families (TANF) Health Care (Medicaid or CHIP): Children Adult
Premium Social Security
The First Amendment is arguably the most controversial issue with regards to the constitution since it was ratified in 1787. Under the First Amendment‚ “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion‚ or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech‚ or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble‚ and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” However‚ the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) directly contradicts the
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Election United States Constitution
The pride of the commission is being the leader in having a competitive edge in health care when seeking excellence in their ability of improving risk management and the reduction of risks to patients and employees alike. Those organizations connected to the commission experience all the benefits of training‚ development of staff recruitment and staff education. Certification programs are offered
Premium Health care Law Health
In the 1950 case of P. Lorillard Co. v. Federal Trade Commission‚ P. Lorillard Co.‚ the makers of Old Gold cigarettes‚ were ordered to “cease and desist from making certain representations found to be false in the advertising of its tobacco products (Warner‚ et al.‚ 2012‚ p. 950) From a practical perspective in the 1950’s caveat emptor‚ or “let the buyer beware” is not a fair or reasonable expectation. While the careful consumer could have looked at the article‚ the culture of the time was not anti-smoking
Premium Law United States United States Constitution
The landmark Supreme Court case‚ Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) changed the system of political campaign contributions in the United States. In the close 5-4 decision‚ the Supreme Court ruled that organizations are allowed to make unlimited political donations. The Justices reached their decision using the First Amendment‚ which pertains to free speech. To state it plainly‚ money equals speech. Surely‚ the Justices in favor of the decision assumed that the donor groups or individuals
Premium Economics Corporation Management
Engage in personal development in health‚ social care or children’s and young peoples setting (SHC 32) 1.Understand what is required for competence in own work role 1.1 Describe the duties and responsibilities of own work role. In my current role as a senior care assistant it’s my duty to maintain standards of care within the organisation by following guidelines set out from the organisations that inspect and govern the home. As a senior/shift leader it is my duty to ensure that staff
Free Medical ethics Geriatrics
European Commission case. In this case‚ with respect to product market delineation‚ the ECJ had to decide whether the trade in bananas is a separate relevant market or if this trade is part of a larger relevant market containing all fresh fruits. Consequently‚ the
Premium Retailing Marketing Online shopping
341 AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION v RICH and Others 5 SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — EQUITY DIVISION AUSTIN J 10 1‚ 18 November 2002‚ 24 February 2003 — Sydney [2003] NSWSC 85 15 20 25 30 Directors — Duties — Non-executive chairman of directors — Statutory duty of care — Responsibilities — Usual practice of chairmen of listed Australian companies — Duty to keep informed — (CTH) Corporations Act 2001 s 180(1)(b). Words and phrases — “responsibilities within the corporation”
Premium Board of directors Corporate governance