represents as an argument of whether Wikipedia online encyclopedia is a valid‚ credible‚ or reliable source of information and research. In addition‚ I will develop and debate based upon the outcomes of the debate for Wikipedia and against Wikipedia. She will also support her argument against Wikipedia by identifying criteria used to evaluate the credibility of sources of information. Against Wikipedia Online Encyclopedia Zawistoski (2007) states that‚ “Wikipedia is the world’s largest available encyclopedia
Premium Wikipedia
Although Dr. Grossman is good in several specialties‚ his specialties are all put together in one office‚ which may make some readers believe that he is not very skilled in a specialty that they may need him for. Another qualifier that devalues his credibility is the fact that Dr. Grossman only spends a few hours each month to take care of homeless people’s teeth in his “Homeless not Toothless” program. After calculating the
Premium Critical thinking Navy The Reader
Public Speaking Professor Berry March 20th‚ 2014 You have done very well on this assignment. Grade 15 Points Assignment 5 Chapter 15 1. Object- Animals: Purpose Statement- To inform my audience about the evolution of how dogs became house pets. Organization- Chronological Topical Process- Hobbies: Painting Purpose Statement- To inform my audience how to paint a picture. Organization- ChronologicalTopical Event- Cultural Customs: Cinco de Mayo Purpose Statement- To inform my audience
Premium Oprah Winfrey Credibility Talk show
group of people‚ as well as other examples‚ in order to prove that people watch how they speak every day. Given the extensive factual information‚ it is clear that the Hayawakas know their subject and is writing for an educated audience and have credibility because of their backgrounds. The Meanings of a Word In “The Meanings of a Word” by Gloria Naylor (1986)‚ the author argues that everyone develops their own association for words based on their backgrounds and environment they are exposed to. Naylor
Premium Meaning of life Linguistics Psychology
Hum 186 Social Media The advantages of obtainable information can be a superior tool‚ for an individual who needs to find information quickly. They can go online and get any type of information needed for whatever they may need the information for‚ such as work‚ school‚ business or leisure. If someone needs to research a particular disease‚ surgery or pain they have‚ he or she would be able to obtain the information quickly and easily‚ to discover exactly what the symptoms entail. Suggestions
Premium Person History of the Internet Credibility
ANSWER KEY Fundamentals of Oral Communication (English 203) Final Exam Spring 2015 Name: _________________________ ID: ____________________________ Instructor: ______________________ Section: ________________________ Date: May 14‚ 2015___________________ Time: 2 hours The final exam is 20% of the course grade. Directions: Read the speech below and then answer the questions on the provided exam booklet. Speech by Anthony Lake‚ UNICEF Executive Director‚ in
Free Primary education School Primary school
the process of being fully answered by some. However‚ not all of these answers can be deemed as credible. There are a lot of misleading articles‚ web pages‚ and blogs that share their opinion on matters of health when realistically; they have no credibility in doing so. Just because someone is voicing his or her opinion on a subject‚ it does not mean that you have to listen to that voice because it may contain biases and be inaccurate. Part A Here are three website addresses that I think provide
Premium Critical thinking Credibility Bias
all tied back to her original goal of informing. The diversity in the world is a gift‚ and Adichi wanted every realm of the world to be accounted for‚ not just the stereotypes. Direct comparisons were used by Adichi because she wanted personal credibility that could be taken by the listeners. They will never go away‚ but the acceptance can
Premium Short story Appeal to emotion Mind
debated in class is Wikipedia. “Wikipedia is an online open-content collaborative encyclopedia.......” "Wikipedia:general Disclaimer" (2011) So what about Wikipedia does or does not make it a credible source. Below I will discuss the debate outcomes‚ the arguments between both sides‚ and my reasoning for choosing the against side. An argument was developed based on debate outcomes Based on the debate outcomes from the group‚ there were many good points in reasoning why Wikipedia is or is not a credible
Premium Wikipedia Critical thinking Logic
approach and data collection and processing‚ Wikipedia has become a popular method for many to seek out answers. When it comes to the topic of Wikipedia‚ most of us will readily agree that it’s a great source for information. Where this agreement usually ends‚ however‚ is on the question of its validity. Whereas some are convinced that it’s a means of presenting facts‚ others maintain that its accuracy should be highly scrutinized. Although Wikipedia can provide expeditious access to vast amounts
Premium