E-commerce in India and the potential competition issues With special reference to credit cards market in India Submitted to Mr. Rakesh Kumar‚ Joint director (economics)‚ Competition Commission of India Submitted by Ankita Pahuja M.sc economics ‚2nd year‚ TERI University‚ Vasant Kunj‚ Delhi 1 Disclaimer This project report/dissertation has been prepared by the author as an intern under the Internship Programme of the Competition Commission of India for academic purposes only. The views expressed
Premium Electronic commerce Credit card
The MRTP Act was a precursor to the Competition Act and sought to legislate over issues relating to restrictive and monopolistic trade practices. There are areas of similarities between the MRTP Act and the Competition Act. The primary distinction between the enactments stems from the legislative objec¬tive. While the thrust of the Competition Actis to promote competition‚ the objective of the MRTP Act was to prevent economic concentration and restrictive trade practices. Even in respect of merger
Premium Economics Monopoly Competition
Competition does contribute to progress in society under most conditions. In the sciences‚ competition between scientists in the same field will compel every scientist to develop new ideas and to realize the applications of those new ideas more quickly so that as a whole the human knowledge accumulate more quickly and more discoveries and technologies are available for the better life of human being. In economies‚ practice has proved that the market economy based on competition is more viable than
Premium Competition Human Science
Kendra Bryant August 9‚ 2010 Professor Thompson Abstract The purpose of this paper is to analyze federal antitrust enforcers are investigating whether a multinational pharmaceutical company has attempted to minimize the impact of generic competition to one of its most profitable prescription drugs. This anti-depressant drug is the company’s best seller‚ with sales last year of $2.11 billion‚ representing a 22% increase from the year before. I will review whether pharmaceutical companies have
Premium Pharmacology Generic drug Food and Drug Administration
Unity-mountain Climbing Competition from Shibo Preparation for reading: We love the shibo‚ love the shibo vibrant‚ love the big stage of the shibo‚ love the shibo unity‚ love every employee from shibo. Mountain climbing competition held in Gongyi Fuxi Mountain is just a miniature of shibo.. On the steps of spring‚ the Mountaineering climbing Competition jointly organized by shibo International Trade Department and e-commerce Department held in Gongyi Fuxi Mountain on April 3‚ 2012. the company
Premium Mountaineering Mountain Management
Moore 1 G’Anna Moore Rothacker English 101 13 June 2008 Domestic Violence: A Life Threatening Issue That Should Be Taken Seriously or Just an Exaggerated Problem? Every girl growing up‚ including me‚ dreamed of the day when she would be married. My fantasies of marriage would include financial stability‚ a big house with a garden‚ and at least two children that I would raise along
Premium Abuse Child abuse Domestic violence
Li (No.2012960642) | |Date: |Jan 20‚ 2013 | Case Memo Bitter Competition: The Holland Sweetener Company versus NutraSweet - 1. How should Vermijs expect NutraSweet to respond to the Holland Sweetener Company’s entry into the European and Canadian aspartame markets? (1) Baseline: Product: aspartame was
Premium Competition Monopoly Economics
Economics of Competition Policy in India: Emerging issues Rajeev C.Bharathan‚ Background Generally in economics‚ competition is seen as rivalry among firms for a larger share of the market‚ which leads to efficiency in production and lower prices for the consumers. Competition can be defined as a process by which cost efficient production is achieved in a structure where entry and exit are easy‚ a reasonable number of players (producers and consumers are present) and close substitution between
Premium Economics Competition Economic growth
The consequences of competition for the pricing and output decisions of firms are most easily established in the model of pure competition‚1 which requires that 1. Potential buyers and sellers are numerous and each is so small relative to the market that individual decisions about purchases or output do not noticeably affect market demand or supply‚ nor‚ consequently‚ do individual decisions affect the market price. 2. Firms in the industry produce a homogeneous (standardized)
Premium Supply and demand Microeconomics Economics
Why perfect competition?? Executive Summary This report provides information related to the four main market structures and why perfect competition is the most efficient. Features of four market structures and comparison of monopoly and perfect competition. Perfect completion is most efficient Subject matter Details Conclusions Introduction Market structure is best defined as the organizational and other characteristics of
Premium Economics Monopoly Perfect competition