This was even better than our predicted pH of 7.93 based on our calculation, and this difference could be due to error in the calibration of our pH meter, error when measuring amounts of components, or problems with the pH meter, as we were struggling with it throughout the lab because it kept resetting itself back to a pH of 7.0. To compare the effectiveness of the buffer, 0.5 mL of NaOH was also added to a 30 mL solution of water. The water experienced a much greater increase in pH than did the buffer as it jumped from a pH of 6.66 to 11.62. This difference was actually smaller than our calculated value, 12.2, but this could be due to similar errors as mentioned before. This difference in pH change demonstrates how effective buffers are at maintaining pH compared to plain water, and shows that Tris is a relatively good buffer at this
This was even better than our predicted pH of 7.93 based on our calculation, and this difference could be due to error in the calibration of our pH meter, error when measuring amounts of components, or problems with the pH meter, as we were struggling with it throughout the lab because it kept resetting itself back to a pH of 7.0. To compare the effectiveness of the buffer, 0.5 mL of NaOH was also added to a 30 mL solution of water. The water experienced a much greater increase in pH than did the buffer as it jumped from a pH of 6.66 to 11.62. This difference was actually smaller than our calculated value, 12.2, but this could be due to similar errors as mentioned before. This difference in pH change demonstrates how effective buffers are at maintaining pH compared to plain water, and shows that Tris is a relatively good buffer at this