There are two parts of government in the fact of federal government and state government. These two sections are found within the two Houses of Congress, The House of Representatives and the Senate. Within these two houses they deal with separate issues, one with the problems that are on a state-to-state level, the other on matters that hold the whole country’s best interest, so definitely on more of a national scale. There are slight differences in both houses, even being down to how long each terms are within each house with the House being 2 years and the Senate being three times this with 6 years for a term. The fact of the House term being so short before the next election it almost forces the members to focus and get what is needed for their constituency. Especially as if nothing productive is done within the two years of their election it could be that they are not voted in again. ___ example Dole ? This means that within their term, members need to do as much as they can do to do what’s in their constituency’s best interest. This comes with a certain amount of negotiation and ‘log rolling’ to get what is needed. This term comes from the idea of helping another to roll his logs so he’ll roll yours- in theory to perhaps help with another state’s needs so they’ll aid you in getting what you need for your state, or in other terms ‘bringing home the bacon’.
So, for the constituency this is the best thing as their representative is focused solely on what is needed for them, therefore being very responsive to whatever they need. However and in contrast as the Senate have a longer term they almost have a sense of relief and stability within their membership.
The Founding Fathers had the intention for both the Houses of Congress, especially for the House of Representatives as a way of being more democratic as letting the citizens of each constituency to vote for their representative. Similarly the Fathers had an intention for the Senate too as it would serve as a voice for the nation as a whole and a single place where this would all take place. There is the debate which house is more important, especially as the Senate is more the ‘deliberating’ house, filled with professionals within their area and looking at the overall picture rather than focusing on the small perhaps insignificant thing, especially when it comes to external and international happenings. Although the House of Representative is doing more of a ‘selfish’ role in what’s best for their own particular constituencies interest and on a general scale paying more attention to this than what’s happening on the grand and national scale. Similarly in the UK there is the House of Commons and the House of Lords, the Lords who are the ‘upper chamber’, like the Senate, having well educated people in their areas as well as in the ‘lower chamber’ representatives for individual constituencies. However there are similarities between the two Houses of Congress in the fact that although their term may differ they are both directly elected and have a majority and minority party leader within them. They also both have majority and minority whips to help keep them in their party line. Similarly to the UK however less strict as in the UK whips are taken very seriously and can have a significant effect on the member at hand. Overall, it is right that the members fo the US Congress are concerned with the local members as this is the House of Representatives job and therefore leaves the act of ‘issues affecting the whole country’ with the other half of Congress, the Senate.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
According to Table 12.1, what are the differences between the House and the Senate? 437-8…
- 5850 Words
- 24 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Meet Your Rep. The Constitution states, “The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States…” (Art. I, Sec. 2). Contrast this with the original constitutional language for the other house of Congress, “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof for six Years…” (Art. I, Sec. 3). The phrase “chosen by the Legislature” was changed to “elected by the people” by the 17th Amendment, but not until 1912. In other words, from the beginning the House of Representatives was intended to be exactly what its name suggests –representative of the people. (Note that in 2010 the Tea Party, and some Republican politicians, called for repeal of the 17th Amendment, eliminating the popular vote for Senators. While most Republican politicians have backed away from that view, many Tea Party chapters continue to demand its repeal.)…
- 6696 Words
- 18 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Fathers of Confederation conceived of the Senate as a “chamber of sober second thought.” However, almost ever since its creation, as the unelected arm of the legislature, people have suggested ways in which to reform the upper house. Concerns of illegitimate representation, party loyalty, and patronage are the main reasons the argument for change continues. This paper aims to review a couple of recent reform proposals, and then argue, leaving constitutional practicality behind, that the Senate should receive a major overhaul in how it is formed and represented.…
- 558 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Senators represent an entire state, as members of the House of Representatives only represent districts, highlighting from the outset their different abilities to reach a broader spectrum of people, along with Senates being 1 of 100, and House members being 1 of 435. Therefore Senators have an easier avenue to implement their work, as a House representative has far less status, due to them being far denser in numbers a clear example of this is that of Bill Frist who in January 2003 became majority leader after only eight years in the Senate. While at the same time Representative Nancy Pelosi became House minority leader, but she had been a member in the house since 1987. This further highlights the ability of those with the senate to gain more status. Power within Congress is very much concentrated within committees, rather than that of the Chamber floor in question, which further highlights the Senates greater status, as Senators are far more likely to chair committees, which further heightens their status on Capitol Hill.…
- 767 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
I was born and grown up in another country since childhood, but in the recent years I got a chance to travel and study in the US. At first, I didn’t pay any attention to the US government and its issues, until I take a government class. I started to have a strong interest in this subject. Here is a summary of the district I’m currently living on and its representative, and my interest on political issue.…
- 1060 Words
- 3 Pages
Powerful Essays -
John Adams has also said, “Without [term limits] every man in power becomes a ravenous beast of prey.” By sending our representatives home to their communities we would be forcing them to strongly consider proposed legislation, as they would be returning to laws by which they would be subject to reside under. Our Founding Fathers would have hoped for the future of America to respect the institutions of Congress by filtering out representatives and senators as the years…
- 509 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“... vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”- Constitution…
- 1188 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
For starters, the expectations of a member of congress are highly different from that of a typical citizen. The expectation and duties of a Member of Congress are extensive, encompassing several roles that could be full time jobs within itself. One Outstanding difference is there income. Most members of Congress are considerably wealthy and earn a pretty high income where as a typical citizen usually doesn’t come close.. In the year 2010 a member of Congress earned around 174, 000 which is more than 5 times what a typical citizen made.…
- 305 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Another difference is that the Senate is composed of 100 senators, two from each state. The House of Representatives, however, is made up of 435 representatives. The number of representatives each state receives is determined by that state’s population. A third difference would be the fact that each serves different term lengths. A member from the Senate serves a six year term, while a member from the House of Representatives serves a two year term.…
- 303 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Since the First United States Congress meeting in 1789 to Current meetings in Capital building there has been speculation about how functional Congress is. Whether someone thinks Congress is Dysfunctional like Ezra Klein, or they are trying to defend Congress like Lee H. Hamilton, it has to be understood that Congress is a very complex institution that has its ups and its downs. Although in the past 100 years congress has been more dysfunctional than functional. A man who has been working his entire life to improve the United States left Congress, he left because he felt like he wasn’t serving the society anymore. Bayh decided because congress is so dysfunctional that he would rather leave and work in a job that directly affected society…
- 724 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The aim of this paper is to restructure and engage the pending frays of Congress to promote justice for the common welfare. In this paper I will define quality representation and how it should best benefit society. The goal is to create an efficacious Congress that has a lasting impact on the country and serves as a beacon of light for the rest the world. Congress will begin to tackle issues that plague the land rather than pushing forth their own agendas for personal gratification. Furthermore, I will outline the parameters of campaigning, more explicitly, explaining the intrinsic motivation behind each member serving the people of this nation and how funds should be spent.…
- 695 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Polarization in Congress leads to less bills reaching the President for review. While a Congress that passes every bill it meets provides no benefits, Congressmen should not shirk their duties primarily due to polarization. Representatives’ achievements for the term should instead be limited on properly in-depth debate and discussion relating to the legislature they need to pass. However, at an increasing rate, senators drop bills out of the law-generating cycle (Andris, 10). Andris, et al, explains: “The number of bills introduced seems to . . . [correlate] with a decrease in Congressional productivity.” (10). Further, Andris et al also finds that in Congress, “The average number of disagreements on roll call votes between [congressmen]…
- 887 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
There are a multitude of differences between the House of Representatives and the Senate. Generally, the House of Representatives defines rules through committees, and the Senate’s rules are extremely archaic. The senate is unique legislative body due to the rules that define how debate takes place on the floor. In fact, modern day senators can hold up debate simply by saying they wish to filibuster; they are no longer must stand and talk for hours on end. The House, on the other hand, has a specified Rules Committee and forbids extended debate on legislation on the floor.…
- 297 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Many Americans today are displeased with and have expressed their discontent with the lawmaking actions—or the lack thereof, rather—of members of Congress. However, solutions to resolve, or at least improve, public approval of their congressional representatives are unclear and plagued by some of the following questions: are term limits the answer, will they do more harm than good, and is it just a trade-off for different, yet equally adverse issues?…
- 841 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the past century, people continued to express an increasingly discontent view of Congress especially true when one looks back before the Clinton Impeachment debacle As the size of the nation and the number of congressman have grown, the congress has come under attack by both public influences and congressman themselves. Yet looking at one congressman's relationship with his or her constituents, it would be hard to believe that this is the branch of government that has come under suspect. In "If Ralph Nader says congress is 'The broken branch,' how come we love our congressman so much?" author Richard F. Fenno, Jr., provides insight into this view and why, through congress coming under fire, constituents still feel positively about there congressmen. Although congress is often criticized, its fine tuned functioning is essential in checking the power of congress without hindering the making of legislation…
- 759 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays