Preview

12 Angry Men Discussion Questions

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
295 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
12 Angry Men Discussion Questions
writing assignment 1
12 ANGRY MEN
(25 points total)

Instructions:

The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate your knowledge and comprehension of the small group communication concepts we have discussed thus far by identifying examples and applying the concepts to the movie we watched in class. In your small groups, type out your answers for each of the following questions. Be specific and detailed in your responses, using concepts and terms from the textbook and providing specific examples from the movie. Cite all sources you use and all information you borrow (such as the textbook).

Due date: * October 9th, 2012 * Submit a hard copy in class (1 submission per group) * Attach a grading rubric to the back of your assignment * Submit the same assignment electronically into Turnitin.com on or before the day you submit your hard copy. * Be sure that only one person from your group submits your paper. Multiple submissions of the same assignment will show up as plagiarism.

Video link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6QhKPZDZTE Discussion questions:

1. What techniques does Juror 8 use to change the other jurors’ minds and votes? Specifically, discuss and describe how the minority opinion prevailed over the majority opinion in the movie. 2. How did the jurors combat groupthink? Specifically, describe what the jurors said and did to combat groupthink. 3. Discuss the brainstorming, deliberation and group decision making process that went on among the jurors. What techniques can you apply to your own group to ensure that discussion is thorough and all group members participate in discussion? 4. Identify variables that make discussion and decision making difficult and provide examples from the movie. Then explain how your own group can overcome these difficulties should you encounter them in your own

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Juror #8 displayed this ability throughout the entire movie. He always had a persuasive but yet argumentative approach to the deliberations. His relevant use of his perspective to others is what gave him the ability to sway others to his direction.…

    • 336 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    QUES Law Ethics Assignment

    • 1817 Words
    • 7 Pages

    7. You must submit this paper to turnitin.com. Further instructions about submitting the paper to…

    • 1817 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Each Act takes happens in the same place. The entire play takes place in the jury room of a New York City court of law in 1957 during a very hot summer afternoon. It is a large, dull, minimalistic room with three windows in the brick wall which the skyline of New York City can be seen. There is also a wash room and lavatory off the jury room. There is a large, scarred table in the centre with twelve chairs around it. There are pencils pads and an ashtray on the table. There is also a water cooler in the room with plastic cups. The dullness of the room may signify and provide a mood for the act and is evident in the interactions between the jurors. The Twelve jurors are all seemingly awkward and uneasy towards each other once they enter the room.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Juror 4 undergoes a series of questions regarding his confidence that a young man is guilty of murder. From the beginning to the end of the play, Juror 4 gradually changes his mind about his initial vote, through the constructive discussions lead by Juror 8. Juror 4 moves from a belief that all legal witnesses are faultless to truly experiencing some sort of “reasonable doubt.” He is left with a clearer picture of the case, looking beyond his personal prejudices and biases.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the drama Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, there are twelve jurors to discuss and deliberate if the murder in the first degree is guilt or not. Because the verdict must be unanimous, twelve jurors have a critical thinking in their discussion and finally made the vote from eleven jurors vote for guilty to unanimous vote for not guilty. During the development of the voting, Juror Three is hardly to persuade because he has a serious prejudice to the murder. If Juror Three does not admit the murder is not guilty, they cannot settle a lawsuit. Therefore, Juror Three’s prejudice should be the key to get the final verdict.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Flaws

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Throughout the years of America, we had many juries during criminal trials to decide if the defendant guilty or not guilty. In the 1957 movie, 12 Angry Men shows the best representation of American jury system and how people change their minds. 12 Angry Men shows that personal feeling get in the way in their votes. The movie is about how 12 jurors decide the fate of young boy that persumed he killed his father, while during the initial vote only Juror 8 raised his hand not guilty. Then throughout the movie and script each of the 11 jurors for various reason change their votes to not guilty. The 12 jurors change their votes from guilty to not guilty through character flaws, positive personality traits, expertise on the evidence, and pattern of behavior.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Essay

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The movie "12 Angry Men" focuses on a jury's decision on a capital murder case. A 12-man jury is sent to begin decisions on the first-degree murder trial of an 18-year-old Latino accused of stabbing his father to death, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence. The case appears to be open-and-shut: The defendant has a weak alibi; a knife he claimed to have lost is found at the murder scene; and several witnesses either heard screaming, saw the killing or the boy fleeing the scene. Eleven of the jurors immediately vote guilty; only Juror No. 8 (Mr. Davis) casts a not guilty vote. At first Mr. Davis' bases his vote more so for the sake of discussion after all, the jurors must believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. As the movie unfolds, the story quickly becomes a study of the jurors' complex personalities and how they deal with argumentation within groups and critical thinking. This allows Mr. Davis to try and convince the other jury members that the defendant might not be guilty by using cooperative argumentation, claim, evidence, warrant, facts, etc.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gropps and Teams

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Discuss the influence that leadership—or the lack of leadership—had on the team’s or group’s ability to solve the problem. What style of leadership did the leader exhibit? What problem-solving steps were taken to resolve the situation? What steps would have produced better results?…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Do you think that the film Twelve Angry Men promotes the jury system or speaks out against it? Explain using evidence from the film.…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Now you can see the differences between Jurors Three and Eight. These two jurors are very different , especially when it comes to their personalities. Despite their differences they do have some similarities, which are stated in this essay. After reading this paper, you should better understand these two very different, but similar…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People can change based on the personalities contained in a group. For example, if the personalities in a group are positive and supportive, then each person’s self-esteem is boosted up and he or she will speak his or her mind. However, if the personalities in a group are aggressive or assertive, then each person might be less willing to speak his or her mind and go along with the group. Not only that, but a typical person wouldn’t stand up for something alone. He/she would instead go with the majority of people. In a group of 100 people, each person with his/her opinion, at least 30 % of those 100 would stand up against everyone else.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Imagine having to decide a young boy’s fate who is accused of murder in the first degree. This is the case in “Twelve Angry Men”, the prize-winning drama written by Reginald Rose. Some jurors address relevant topics, while others permit their personal “judgments” from thoroughly looking at the case. After hours of deliberation, the jurors reached the decision that the boy is not guilty, due to the fact of reasonable doubt. While few jurors are motivated by their respect and determination for the justice system, Juror 10 is motivated by his personal prejudice.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Team Communication

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6. Did the jury go through the four stages of teaming? Identify the stages they went through and cite evidence from the movie to support your answer.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juror's Arguement Analysis

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When discussing a single dissenting juror, an iconic film Twelve Angry Men, is a well-known portrayal of analyzing the decision-making process in groups. This film showed that persuasion in groups can take place in various methods (Proctor, 1991). Though this film shows how the minority can influence the majority, the effects of conformity were still the similar. Ultimately, a vote of 11-1 to punish the boy on trial for murdering his dad, changed to a unanimous 12 man vote to pardon him. While this dissenting juror maintained independence and ultimately influenced the majority, this is not typically the…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reconstruction was followed by the civil war and took place in the southern states. The reconstruction was an attempt of bringing in confederate states back into the union. Amendments were added to the constitution to protect black people in the south. This was important because they were trying to make the south safe for the blacks.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays