Preview

12 Angry Men essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1193 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
12 Angry Men essay
The plot of 12 angry jurors revolves around the innocent boy who was accusing of stabbing his father. Their decision may end this boy’s life at the same time it can make him a better person to live. They are all sitting around a hard wooden table still in the center of the humid New York in a sunny day .the room is full of tense and arguments. That was in the 1957 when fans barley worked. The diverse jurors are discussing the case with different opinions and the 12 jurors have different backgrounds that influenced them in every way. The film has so much tense and so much detail that makes the movie more powerful with more techniques that the actors, writer and director wasted there precious time doing this acclaimed film.

The director in 12 angry men used characterization as one of her techniques. She used appearance as the primary method in this film. As we were introduced to the 12 angry jurors sitting in a tight closed room we immediately knew each jurors type from what they wore, how they acted and their facial expressions. We noticed that they all had different personalities and different ways but the only common thing between them is that they were all tensioned. Based on the first scene we saw juror number 2 looking like a nerd with glasses and had a small appearance and always timid and tensioned and is always persuaded by others opinions and when he said "I never knew they locked the door that showed how tensioned he was. Also juror number six looks very dull and rough and unintelligent, wearing an unbuttoned shirt and no tie and he is a negative man that doesn’t look at the positive sides of anything. Juror number seven is the most tensioned character and he plays this role of a man that only cares about watching this baseball game and he proved that by admitting that he would do anything to miss jury duty and every once in a while he looks at his watch which makes the audience more concerned about time . The 8th juror was one of the most confident

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the 1957’s movie 12 Angry Men, it is about twelve jurors who have to come to a verdict whether or not the young boy is guilty for murdering his father. All but one juror said guilty. In the movie we see that jurors are using the arguments made by the witnesses and evidence found which were presented in court to help justify their decision and come to a conclusion on whether he is or isn’t guilty for killing his father. During this deliberation we can see emotion, reason and sense of perception being used by each juror to decide upon their verdict. Some questions that were raised during the movie were, do we make decisions based on our emotion? To what extent does the juror show to be rational or irrational? And In what ways are the eyewitness…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Each Act takes happens in the same place. The entire play takes place in the jury room of a New York City court of law in 1957 during a very hot summer afternoon. It is a large, dull, minimalistic room with three windows in the brick wall which the skyline of New York City can be seen. There is also a wash room and lavatory off the jury room. There is a large, scarred table in the centre with twelve chairs around it. There are pencils pads and an ashtray on the table. There is also a water cooler in the room with plastic cups. The dullness of the room may signify and provide a mood for the act and is evident in the interactions between the jurors. The Twelve jurors are all seemingly awkward and uneasy towards each other once they enter the room.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Analysis

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the movie twelve angry man, after the twelve jurors listened to the facts in the trail, the judge gives her instructions to them. The judge told them that the man could face the death penalty if he found guilty. The 12 man gather in a stifling hot room to have a concluding about the case. They start arguing and adding their own experience, culture, and understanding of people's motives as a way of reconsidering the facts. Although all the jurors had listened to the same stated facts and they were in the same situation, each one of them interprets the facts differently. This reflects the differences in people and the different ways that we view the same things.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eyewitness In 12 Angry Men

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film 12 Angry Men is about a murder trial conducted in a courtroom. The judge gave the jury its final instruction telling them that a guilty verdict will result in a death sentence for the defendant, an 18-year-old boy who was accused of murdering his father using a knife! One juror had a personal connection with the case. He has not seen his son for more than two years. He claims that the young boy is guilty and that all young kids are criminals. The juror has bias towards the trial because he see his son in the young boy. Out of the twelve jurors, eleven jurors voted for conviction. Another juror states that he has doubts about the case and hopes to give the boy a favorable decision. The young boy had a hard life living in the slum. A third juror claims that each of the…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reginald Rose’s play, Twelve Angry Men, is about a jury’s decision making process in a murder trial. The facts in this play become blinded by the prejudices that some Juror’s possess. A prejudice jury became formed due to a biased testimony and the facts became clouded as generalisations were formed by the Juror’s. Some Juror’s bigotry can be based on their past experiences and discrimination didn’t only happen to the defendant, but it was also experienced by Juror’s themselves…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    12 Angry Men is in a 1950’s courtroom, where 12 men from various backgrounds and different personalities, find themselves deciding the fate of a teenage boy accused of murdering his father. The vote must be unanimous and without doubt, with a guilty verdict resulting in the death of the young man facing trial.…

    • 2795 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Essay

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The movie "12 Angry Men" focuses on a jury's decision on a capital murder case. A 12-man jury is sent to begin decisions on the first-degree murder trial of an 18-year-old Latino accused of stabbing his father to death, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence. The case appears to be open-and-shut: The defendant has a weak alibi; a knife he claimed to have lost is found at the murder scene; and several witnesses either heard screaming, saw the killing or the boy fleeing the scene. Eleven of the jurors immediately vote guilty; only Juror No. 8 (Mr. Davis) casts a not guilty vote. At first Mr. Davis' bases his vote more so for the sake of discussion after all, the jurors must believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. As the movie unfolds, the story quickly becomes a study of the jurors' complex personalities and how they deal with argumentation within groups and critical thinking. This allows Mr. Davis to try and convince the other jury members that the defendant might not be guilty by using cooperative argumentation, claim, evidence, warrant, facts, etc.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Write a one page response, skipping lines, for EACH question for a total of two pages.…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Essay

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the beginning of 12 Angry Men, they clarify that they had sat through six days of court listening to the case, and were now ready to decide the verdict. After those six days of hearing believed conclusive evidence and no defense from the plaintiff, it seemed to be an assured decision. When I researched on what exactly happens in the Jury Room it said: The first motion of business in a jury room is to select one of the jurors as a foreman. He or she leads the discussion and tries to encourage everyone to join in the discussion. Every juror should have input. The purpose of these deliberations is to have a robust, uninhibited discussion which will lead to a calm, unbiased reasoning. With that being understood, it helped me comprehend and get more of a grasp on what the climate the jury room should have.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men is a novel written by Reginald Rose in 1955. The story takes place in 1957 in the jury-room of a New York Court of Law. It is about a young delinquent who is on trial for the murder of his aggressive farther. Eleven jurors are directed by the judge to gather on a hot afternoon to declare if there is any reasonable doubt as to why the boy is not guilty. One, even though far from convinced of the boy’s innocence, feels that some of the evidence against him is ambiguous. By the end of the day that juror has reversed opinions of all eleven jurors.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which type of jury is better, a unanimous jury or a majority jury? While both have their advantages and disadvantages, I believe that a unanimous jury of ordinary people is the best way to come to a verdict.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 Angry Men Memo

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On Monday October 28, 2016 Wellness Coach Teresa Cain went to Wilfred Gallegos apartment to see how he was doing since I have not seen him come by staff office in a few days. Wellness Coach knocked on Mr. Gallegos door and he open the door while appearing to be well groomed. Mr. Gallegos was listing to music while relaxing. Mr. Gallegos said Hi and wellness coach responded hi and asked how his morning was going. Mr. Gallegos stated that he was doing well but let me know that he was unable to attend group. Mr. Gallegos seem to really want to attend group being that he enjoys himself while he is there. The reason Mr. Gallegos could not attend group because he was not able to use the restroom due to having a colonoscopy exam. Wellness Coach ask…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men Analysis

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    12 Angry Men Summary Fucking hot in the room…say something about the environment Coach -sets the stage for the negotiation by assigning seats based on juror number -said “you fellas can handle this any way you want to, im not going to make any rules”…he should have assumed more of a leadership role from the start -showed signs of becoming a good mediator by redirecting Advertising man’s attention back to the discussion. But then, he said to HF “and we might be able to show you were you were mixed up.” -Coach offered to hand control to GO after GO called Coach a kid…caused a confrontation should have separated people from problem. Took shit too personally -did nothing when Ad man and MSO played TTT…gave up leadership role to HF -changed his vote @ same time as Ad Man after knife angle argument Mild-Mannered Bank Clerk Had no good reason for guilty vote. “I just think he’s guilty.” -changed his vote to NG during the formal vote -finally asserted himself with argument of knife argument. He’s good at dodging personal attacks Message Service Owner -Tried to form alliance with Mild Mannered Bank Clerk -stated facts from trial -whipped out the picture of his 22 yr old kid. Kid ran away from fight and MSO embarassed. Vowed to make a man out of him. This shows interests other than the trial at hand. Revenge? -was playing tictactoe with Ad Man during discussion of L train…not playing by -after demonstration of old man walking to the door, he fucking blew up and called himself one of the kids executioners…clearly has other interests -told HF he’d kill him fucker yells a lot -ad man changes vote back to guilty and MSO is stoked and brings hung jury up again. watchmaker calls him out of personal interests -ripped the pic of his kid “rotten kids you work your life out.” Cried and changed his vote to not guilty. End of the movie. Everyone leaves. HF helps him with his jacket and waits for him to gather his things. Did not thank him. He’s still a…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Response

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The setting of 12 Angry Men is a jury deliberation room where the jurors are and required to decide the guilt or innocence of an 18 year old that is accused of committing first-degree murder by stabbing his father with a switchblade knife. Witnesses were presented to give evidence of hearing a quarrel; hearing a threat to kill, and have seeing the boy run away. Another witness swore to having seen the boy stabbing his father from a window across from where the murder occurred. Eleven jurors were convinced the boy was guilty and deserved the death penalty. One raised questions he felt had not been asked or had not been pursued by the defense.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Innocent until proven guilty means any person on trial is innocence until there is evidence to prove other wise.Most of American society feels that many people are quick to judge and are careless.I feel that every court trial is fair.However,I agree that a person is innocent until proven guilty…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics