In an article on parenting styles, “Children were viewed as objects that are to be strictly shaped and moulded so that they may develop into efficient tools of society” (Parenting, n.d.). While those fathers are beating the boys, that is exactly what they are being viewed as objects. They did something wrong, so they were strictly shaped into place. As Lazarus describes in his article, “In a time when many of his generations saw corporal punishment of their children as a God-given right, he knew ‘spanking’ as beating, and beating as criminal” (Lazarus, 1995). While the two fathers continue to beat their children, Lazarus’ dad chooses to earn his son’s trust instead of beating him for his wrong …show more content…
His father did not let him go unpunished, but did teach him more of a valuable lesson than his friends fathers did. Sometimes the unspoken is more powerful and meaningful than saying a million hurtful words. This led Lazarus to trust his father, “And I’ll never forget that it was also the day I first understood how deeply I could trust him” (Lazarus, 1995). Overall, Lazarus showed many important aspects through his personal essay. Even though it was accepted to punish with physical acts, his father believed in a different strategy that had an everlasting effect on his son. The pain is only remembered through harsh punishment, never the reason of wrong doing. While the other fathers’ used physical abuse to placate the crowd, Lazarus’ father teaches an unspoken lesson and care about his son’s opinion. Lazarus’ father took the right actions and now he trusts his parents and learned a life lesson without being humiliated