Preview

8th amendment

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
340 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
8th amendment
8TH Amendment: Atkins v. Virginia The Eighth Amendment: It prohibits excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment. In the case of Atkins v. Virginia, the facts brought to the court was that the defendant, Daryl Atkins was tried for capital murder and sentenced to death for the shooting of a victim named Eric Nesbitt. Atkins had been smoking and drinking all day before he decided to walk to a convenient store and hold Nesbitt at gun point, upon Daryl’s dissatisfaction with the money he took, he kidnaped Nesbitt, taking him to an ATM to with drawl 200 dollars, along with a friend named William Jones, in Nesbitt’s car. When Daryl was satisfied with the money taken, he further continued his violence by driving Nesbitt to an isolated area, forcing him out of the vehicle, and then shot Nesbitt eight times killing him.
The issues leading to being tried of capital murder and being sentence to death, was that Daryl Atkins was considered “Mildly Mentally Retarded,” according to an IQ level test, Administered by a Psychologist in High School. Daryl’s IQ level score was a 59, which is considered Mildly MR. The court ordered that he be sentence anyways, despite the facts and findings.
Later the in a retrial, it was argued that he was in fact MR and that Sentencing an MR person is considered “Cruel and Unusual Punishment,” according to the Eighth Amendment in the U.S. Constitution. So the court found that the eighth amendment forbids the death penalty in the cases where an MR person is being punished. And this was with the help of a prior cases, Coker v. Georgia and Enmund v. Florida.
The rational in deciding this case was the prior cases stated and that, in sentencing a person with MR to death will not deter another person with MR, because others with MR will not have that full understanding of consequences ordered by the court to deter them from committing other crimes. Therefore, Daryl Atkins still sits in prison, to this day.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The court previously establish that the death penalty was inappropriate for the crime of rape in Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977), or for those convicted of felony murder who neither themselves killed, attempted to kill, or intended to kill in Enmund v. Florida, 458 U.S. 782 (1982). The Court found that the Eighth Amendment forbids the imposition of the death penalty in these cases because legislatures had recently addressed the matter have rejected the death penalty for these offenders. Moreover, the Court defer the judgments of those bodies. The court ruled 6-3 that executing mentally retarded individuals violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments, but states can define who is mentally…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Carr brothers should have been sentenced separately and given two different hearings. The Eighth Amendment may be unclear whether defendants must be given an individualized trial or not but the court’s Eighth Amendment cases have often insisted that defendants must be given “individualized sentencing” in order for the jury to find “an individualized determination” and decide whether the death penalty is appropriate. The issue is that the court has never insisted for defendants to be sentenced by themselves, at their own hearing, without any co-defendants present.…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    R v. Latimer The case with Robert Latimer all began with his twelve year old daughter having cerebral palsy and being quadriplegic. Tracy would suffer from many seizures a day and was also believed to have a brain capacity of a four-month old which caused her to be dependent. Tracy underwent many surgeries to try to give her an “easier” life but nothing seemed to chance any changes. No changes for the better or for the worse.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grigson, a forensic psychiatrist. He testified so often for the prosecution in capital-punishment cases that he had become known as Dr. Death. (A Texas appellate judge once wrote that when Grigson appeared on the stand the defendant might as well “commence writing out his last will and testament.”) Grigson suggested that Willingham was an “extremely severe sociopath,” and that “no pill” or treatment could help him. Grigson had previously used nearly the same words in helping to secure a death sentence against Randall Dale Adams, who had been convicted of murdering a police officer, in 1977.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The jury returned with a guilty verdict to the death penalty even factoring in his age and his clean record. Simmons moved the trial to lesser his death penalty by telling them to consider his troubling childhood, his addition to drugs, and him having an accomplice. The trial rejected his move and Simmons appealed. When hearing about the overturning of the death sentence in the Atkins v. Virginia due to the 8th amendment, Simmons filed for a new petition for the state. The 8th amendment talks about the prohibition of cruel and injustice punishments and this was a key part of the case.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the death penalty was banned after being ruled unconstitutional in 1972, his sentence was changed to life with a possibility of parole. He was paroled in 1978 and months later he was arrested again and charged with the murder of a 61 year old store owner. Massie is a perfect example of why the death penalty should not be stopped. Richardson could argue Massie had a possibility of parole, which gave him an opportunity to be freed back into society. However, even if Massie had received a life without parole sentence, he could have ended up killing a fellow inmate, a guard, a visitor, or someone else. In addition, it is not unheard of for an inmate to escape from prison…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Let me take you back to one of the darkest days in American history. Monday April 5th, 2013 in Boston Massachusetts two men by the names of Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Dzhokhar Anzorovich Tsarnaev partook in an act of terror on US soil. Two trash can bombs were planted nearby the finish line of the annual Boston Marathon, and the damage these bombs did will forever live in infamy. After the attack, a man hunt through the streets of Boston took place tracking down the men who had commit a mass crime and an act of pure evil. The first of the two brothers, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was shot when he was found; however, the second brother was later captured and taken into custody. Now here lies the question, what punishment is appropriate for someone who committed an act of terror, killing three and injuring over 200…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, William Furman committed a robbery of a private home. The resident of the home awoke to find Furman in his house. Furman tried to escape and while doing so, he tripped and fired his gun accidently, which killed the victim. He was taken to trial and found guilty of murder. Because the shooting occurred during the commission of a felony, Furman was eligible for the death penalty according to the felony murder rule. The rule of felony murder states that if an offender kills, with or without intention, during a dangerous crime, they are guilty of murder. Furman was sentenced to death but the case was taken to the Supreme Court before his punishment was carried out. The issue of the case was whether the death penalty should be considered cruel and unusual punishment. If it was considered cruel and unusual punishment, then it would also be in violation of the 8th and 14th Amendments.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Penry V. Lynaugh Decision

    • 2880 Words
    • 12 Pages

    On June 20, 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. Virginia that executing people with mental retardation violated the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, overruling its Penry v. Lynaugh decision in 1989.…

    • 2880 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an article by Matthew James Nance titled “A Mockery of Justice” he writes about an inmate’s tale of what happen to David Martin Long in the late 80’s. While David Long was still incarcerated there was a reporter that was interested in writing about his story her name was Laura Miller and in 1994 she came to the prison to interview him. She wrote about his injustice in which he wanted to be executed but because Texas law had an automatic appeal process his execution could not be carried out and therefore no matter how many times that he wanted to oppose this the state of Texas denied him his execution. He tells her about his trial and how short the deliberation was. He goes into great, detail in telling her of his wrong doing and how he knows…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The "cruel and unusual" clause in the eighth amendment states that "cruel and unusual punishment" such as torture or lingering death can not be inflicted on anyone as a form of execution. It is however permissible under the 8th Amendment to execute a convict by means of hanging, shooting, electrocution, and lethal gas.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, the Eighth Amendment was of great importance to the constitution, because of it’s protection. According to Eighth Amendment- Kids, 2012, it states, “Punishments must be fair, and cannot be cruel” This means that people cannot sentence others to torturous punishments. Many people do not use torture anymore, because this clause was enforced, According to Eighth Amendment, Imposing excessive and cruel punishment 2014, it is illegal to do harsh punishments. They put forth the information that “the government cannot demand excessive bail.” In other words, a bail, the temporary release of an accused person awaiting…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sentencing

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juveniles who are under the age of 18 cannot be given the death penalty. In Roper v. Simmons in 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the cruel and unusual punishment clause prohibited a state from executing a juvenile who was under the age of 18 when the capital crime was committed. Insane at the time of execution. Ford v. Wainright, 1986, the court held that the eighth amendment prohibits the execution of a prisoner who is insane at the time of execution. Mental Retardation. Atkins v. Virginia, U.S. 2002, and the court held that the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the eighth amendment prohibited imposition of the death penalty on defendants with mental retardation. In 2004, the court held in Tennard v. Dretke evidence of mental retardation is inherently mitigating in a capital case, whether or not the defendant has shown a nexus between his mental capacity and the crime committed.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mentally Ill Executions

    • 3139 Words
    • 13 Pages

    "An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth" is the philosophy many people use when it comes to the punishment of criminals. The death penalty has been debated for many years as it has come into and then fallen out of favor for the American public. Today the death penalty by lethal injection has been put on hold on a couple of states. The legality of the "cruel and unusual punishment" is being heatedly debated. The death penalty is especially volatile when it comes to the mentally ill. When a mentally ill person commits a crime worthy of the death penalty the state and those involved with the case often face a moral and ethical dilemma. If the person is not capable of understanding why they are being executed or what the death penalty means to them, there is a legal, ethical and moral question about the fairness of that execution. The states ' answer has been to medicate the mentally ill prisoner with anti-psychotic drugs so that they become capable of mentally understanding why they are going to be executed. "There is virtually no psychiatric diagnosis that always renders a defendant incompetent or unable to be held responsible for his or her acts (Reid, 1998)." The question then becomes how humane is it to bring them out of their mental illness, get them well enough and then kill them when they are able to finally understand what is happening to them? It is the courts responsibility that the defendant is capable of helping his own defense and that he fully understands his charges and his sentence.…

    • 3139 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abolition of Death Penalty

    • 2375 Words
    • 10 Pages

    First, the imposition of death penalty violates a person's right to live. Article III Section 1 of the 1987 Constitution, otherwise known as the…

    • 2375 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics