9/11 Conspiracy Theories
A pole in the U.S. taken place in 2006 revealed that 53% of questioned people thought that former president Bush administration was hiding something that involved 9/11, and another one third thought in a separate pole that U.S. government officials either assisted or allowed the attacks to happen. That being said, it makes sense that 9/11 conspiracy theories are so well known. The popularity even begins to rival the one of the JFK conspiracy theories. Or quite possibly the one of the Illuminati. With all that said, the theorist have a large population that helps them spread the word about what they believe to be the truth. Though, the truth each theorist believes in varies from one to another. No matter the theory, the 9/11 conspiracy theorist
…show more content…
Conspiracy theories are usually the belief that some influential organization is behind some sort of event. The events with conspiracy theories are usually very big in terms of popularity and how well known it is. As mentioned before, the illuminati is a conspiracy theory, and it is so big most people have heard the name at least once. The illuminati theories are much more diverse then most, but the main theme is that an organization known as the illuminati usually made of powerful and/or wealthy people. They control many of the impactful actions made by governments around the world. Some even state that they run the governments of the United States, and plenty of other influential countries. Basically, 9/11 conspiracy theories are opinions of people who believe some influential people have had something to do with the events of …show more content…
The theory differs from person to person, but this is the most popular one. The government set up explosives in one of the towers and that’s what caused the fall of the towers. Whether planes were involved is a matter not agreed on. Truthers say that the evidence for this view is that the tower couldn’t have fallen so quickly. They also say that there are explosive “squibs” that can be seen going off in the buildings. Research has been done on this theory by professionals, engineers and others, who oppose this belief and have looked at this issue, and have gathered evidence against it. The conflicting group says the reason the building fell down at its speed is because of a process known as pancaking, or professionally called progressive collapse. The studies of the people led them to believe that there was an initial localized failure around the impact zone of the plane and that was likely what led to the progressive collapse. Further studies by a person known as Doctor Seffen have led the person to believe that their calculations of the building would take around nine seconds for the buildings to fall down. At the University of Cambridge, they say it was “a fair assumption in terms of how the building fell.” How the building fell and how fast was not the only thing they looked at. The group looked at the evidence of
Conspiracy theories are usually the belief that some influential organization is behind some sort of event. The events with conspiracy theories are usually very big in terms of popularity and how well known it is. As mentioned before, the illuminati is a conspiracy theory, and it is so big most people have heard the name at least once. The illuminati theories are much more diverse then most, but the main theme is that an organization known as the illuminati usually made of powerful and/or wealthy people. They control many of the impactful actions made by governments around the world. Some even state that they run the governments of the United States, and plenty of other influential countries. Basically, 9/11 conspiracy theories are opinions of people who believe some influential people have had something to do with the events of …show more content…
The theory differs from person to person, but this is the most popular one. The government set up explosives in one of the towers and that’s what caused the fall of the towers. Whether planes were involved is a matter not agreed on. Truthers say that the evidence for this view is that the tower couldn’t have fallen so quickly. They also say that there are explosive “squibs” that can be seen going off in the buildings. Research has been done on this theory by professionals, engineers and others, who oppose this belief and have looked at this issue, and have gathered evidence against it. The conflicting group says the reason the building fell down at its speed is because of a process known as pancaking, or professionally called progressive collapse. The studies of the people led them to believe that there was an initial localized failure around the impact zone of the plane and that was likely what led to the progressive collapse. Further studies by a person known as Doctor Seffen have led the person to believe that their calculations of the building would take around nine seconds for the buildings to fall down. At the University of Cambridge, they say it was “a fair assumption in terms of how the building fell.” How the building fell and how fast was not the only thing they looked at. The group looked at the evidence of