Preview

A Civil Action V. Jan Schlichtmann

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
537 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Civil Action V. Jan Schlichtmann
In the movie, A Civil Action, the plaintiff’s case commenced when a group of various parents and families suspected that the health related issues and deaths in their city of Woburn was the result of contaminated water. Although the attorney, Jan Schlichtmann, was reluctant to take the case at first because they didn’t have plausible cause “who is going to apologize to you when you don’t know who did it and pay me” [1], he perceived that 2 corporations sat on the border of the river. Mr. Schlichtmann and his firm thus took the case and filed a major lawsuit, which stated that that the two corporations, W.R Grace and Beatrice Foods, caused wrongful deaths due to the dumping of hazardous waste.”Lawsuits are a declaration of war. They begin the same way: with a complaint” [1]. The …show more content…
Consequently, this means that the plaintiffs lost a 20 million dollar settlement deal for nothing. Ultimately, the plaintiff’s become desperate, they have no money and no way to pay of all of their debts. They end up settling on an 8 million dollar deal with Grace. “A settlement agreement has been reached between both parties. The exact conditions shall remain private between the parties involved” [1]. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s family would get 375 thousand each but with no apology and additionally, no clean up. Schlichtmann and his firm falls apart as they are all left with nothing but bankruptcy. Because of the plaintiff’s excessive settlement demands and gambling, they lose everything thanks to this case. Furthermore, Schlichtmann gives his files to the EPA, who end up ordering a 69.4 million dollar cleanup of the contaminated area. In which, Beatrice and Grace had to pay for. Ultimately, both the plaintiffs and defendants ended up paying more in the long run. Based on their principles in the beginning movie and if Jan did not have a change in heart it may have ended in the plaintiff's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Facts: In February 2001, Speelman moved into a BHA subsidized apartment with her two minor children. The following month Speelman’s probation was revoked, and she was sentenced to 75 days in jail. BHA was aware Speelman was on probation. She then arranged for her 19 year old daughter, Audrey Larson, to care for her children at her apartment. BHA was not notified Speelman had been incarcerated or of the new occupant in the residence. Office Lowell English, BHA’s police liason, was responding to a complaint about Speelman’s children running around the apartment complex at night. After his visit, officer English found Speelman was incarcerated. On June 2, BHA sent a notice stating Speelman’s voucher payments will be terminated as of July 31st. The letter also states Speelman has the right to appeal the decision by writing a request for a hearing within 14 days. Even though Larson had access to Speelman’s mail, she was specifically instructed only to open mail from the children’s school. Speelman returned to her apartment on June 17th to find the termination letter, and sent a request for a hearing on June 23rd, which is seven days after the deadline. BHA denied the request stating her response was untimely, and she lost her funds.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: In December 1973 Robert Steinberg, the plaintiff, applied for admissions to the Chicago Medical School. He paid an application fee of $15, but his application was rejected. After being rejected he filed against the school, claiming that they did not evaluate his application according to the academic entrance criteria printed in the school’s bulletin. Steinberg argues that the school based its decision primarily on nonacademic consideration such as family connections between the applicant and his family to donate large sums of money to the school. Steinberg assets that by evaluating his application to these unpublished criteria, the school breached the contract it had created when it accepted…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Brief Hanigan V.

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The plaintiff, Francis Hannigan, filed a motion to the Supreme Court of NSW pleading that the defendant, Inghams Enterprises, entered into a binding contract on the terms of a draft contract supplied to Mr Hannigan by Inghams Enterprises. Originally, Mr Hannigan entered into a contract with a company called Sunnybrand Chickens. As part of the contractual agreement, Hannigan would grow chickens on behalf of the suppliers on his farm property for the sole purpose of commercial trade. In 2011, Sunnybrand was taken over by Inghams Enterprises, a major supplier for broiler chickens. Until November 2015, Inghams had adopted the contractual agreement Hannigan had with Sunnybrand.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the movie, ‘ A Civil Action” the case that is presented stated the contamination of the city’s wells. According to the movie, that caused a number of health problems in which it diagnosed eight children with Leukemia and died. After the childrens’ death, the family’s attempted to sue the companies, W.R. Grace, Beatrice Foods, and the tanneries for dumping the chemical TCE, which contaminated the water. Although Jan Schlichtmann’s considered the case worthless because it was an orphan case, he still accepted the case dealing with the tough questioning of loyal workers, constant loss of money and the repeat siding towards the defendant by the trial judge Walter A. Skinner.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Skinner decides that it would be a bad thing for the case if the families took the stand, as it would just make it drag on longer, and eventually says that they will decide this portion of the case based on the geological evidence. At this point, Facher offers Schlictmann 20 million, which Schlictmann turns down. The jury deems Beatrice innocent and Facher packs up and leaves. However, the case continues against W.R. Grace, and at this point, the law firm only has a few chairs and their phones, with no furniture anymore. Later, Grace offers them 8 million, and Schlictmann wants more, but ultimately accepts after a verbal berating by Gordon. When it’s all said and done, each family got 325 thousand dollars, which disappoints the families. Ultimately, the law firm attempts to justify why the money isn’t that much, but Anne Anderson replies by saying “How can you even begin to compare what you've lost, to what we've lost.” [1] Finally, Schlictmann, now more or less broke, sends the appeals case with additional incriminating evidence to the EPA, who ultimately win the appeals in court, and makes the companies undertake the 69.4 million cleanup project, the largest cleanup project up to that point in history.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “judgment is properly granted when there is no triable issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437c(c). A defendant or cross-defendant has met his or her burden of showing that a cause of action has no merit if that party has shown that one or more elements of the cause of action, even if not separately pleaded, cannot be established. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437(o)(2). Once the moving party defendant meets its burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show a triable issue of material fact exists. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437c(o)(2). On appeal, the reviewing court exercises its independent judgment, deciding whether undisputed facts have been established that negate the opposing party's claim or state a complete defense. Cal. Lab. Code § 2922 establishes the presumption that an employer may terminate its employees at will, for any or no reason. A fortiori, the employer may act peremptorily, arbitrarily, or inconsistently, without providing specific protections such as prior warning, fair procedures, objective evaluation, or preferential reassignment”.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lee V. Weisman Case Study

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary of Key Facts A. Deborah Weisman graduated from Nathan Bishop Middle School, a public…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the breakfast banquet, Schlichtmann demanded $25 million for the victims, another $25 million to establish a research institute to “study the links between hazardous waste and illness” and $1.5 million for each family for 30 years (boulder in the road). Subsequently, Beatrice’s attorney found this request outlandish and later offered Schlichtman $20 million (outside the courtroom Jerome place a 20 dollar bill on the bench beside him and said he could add 6 more zeros). He let his greed get the best of him and became obsessed about getting as much money from the corporate giants as he could. Furthermore, Schlichtmann did not have a best alternative to the negotiated agreement (BATNA) and thus declined the offer. The only amount he was willing to accept was the amount the other party was not willing to give. This turned out to be most unwise as the judge ruled that Beatrice Foods was not culpable for the outbreak of cancer-related deaths and other illnesses in the small Massachusetts community. In the end he ended up with an $8 million settlement from…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On April 6th, 1967 at Boston University in William Baird violated Massachusetts law at the time when he handed a condom and a package of Emko vaginal foam to an unmarried 19 year old young woman. At the time of the incident, under Massachusetts state law “Crimes against Chastity” makes it a felony for anyone to give away a drug, medicine, instrument, or article for the prevention of conception except in the case of (1) a registered physician administering or prescribing it for a married person or (2) an active registered pharmacist furnishing it to a married person presenting a registered physician's prescription. The Massachusetts Supreme Court set aside the conviction for exhibiting contraceptives on the grounds that it violated Baird First Amendment rights, but sustained the conviction for giving away the foam. The law permitted…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case: Goldberg, Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York v. Kelly et al. (1970)…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hugo H. Hanson Case

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page

    Hugo H. Hanson, II CPA P.C. is a certified public accounting firm that is located in Weaverville, North Carolina. Hugo H. Hanson, II CPA P.C. carries out small business specific services such as QuickBooks desktop and online training and installation and support, payroll services, bookkeeping, corporate and LLC tax returns, and financial advice. This certified public accounting firm offers tax services such as individual taxes for all 50 states and multiple state returns, business taxes for corporations, S- corporations, LLCs in all states, non-profit returns – 990s, trust returns – 1041s, as well as tax planning and advice. Hugo H. Hanson, II CPA P.C. strives to guarantee friendly and efficient service. Hugo H. Hanson, II CPA P.C. provides…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Spot check was for the purposes of checking licenses, insurance, mechanical fitness of cars sobriety of the drivers.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morse V. Frederick

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Personally as a Supreme Court judge and after taking a fairly through look at the cases, I’d have to rule in favor of Frederick. While the banner that Mr. Frederick had up during the school event does make a reference to drugs, the message is pretty vague as even I can’t really interpret the true absolute definition of the banner. Judge Steven even states “Justice John Paul Stevens took the position that the school 's interest in protecting students from speech that can be reasonably regarded as promoting drug use does not justify Frederick 's punishment for his attempt to make an ambiguous statement simply because it refers to drugs.” ( n/a, 2012). Another important reason why I am following this ruling is because while yes Mr. Frederick had a 14 foot banner held high it didn’t exactly disrupt the school event itself and it was the principals own interpretation of the message that caused a disruption that escalated into Frederick’s unjustified punishment. This statement from the ACLU even states that Fredericks actions were done off school campus, “As the ACLU and Mertz noted, the sign caused no disruption, was displayed at the Olympic Torch Relay - a public event on public streets - and Frederick had not yet arrived at school for the day.” (N/a, 2007 ). Just by this alone I believe that the principal had no justification in asking to take the banner down because of the cryptic message let alone punish Mr. Frederick just because of her own intrepertation.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Litigation

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Making sure that the correct information and witnesses are kept with the correct client’s case file…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Civil Action - Movie

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The movie A Civil Action is focused on describing and explaining what really goes on in a court of law. The case the movie deals with is a small firm going after a national corporation in order to get them to apologize for what they did to the city’s water. It is believed that the company would dump harmful waste such as trichloroethylene into the back of their site where the company was located into a small running river. However, the river was connected to the city’s water wells and caused harm to many children that drank the water. The way each lawsuit is handled can be related to a sociological perspective. The Marxist approach can best explain the process and outcome of the case in A Civil Action.…

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays