Many years we classified what is considered luxury by having majestic homes and servants. What a big difference from today. These people remained in their own worlds, classifying them apart from others. They created their individual systems independent of the other, while creating an atmosphere that made them untouchable. This type of behavior was passed down from generation to generation.
Upon the birth of the industrial market, …show more content…
came a new blood line. These people became the new generation who brought along with them a new make up of wealthiness. These people presented a newer sense of luxury that gave them a newer, differentiated social class and status.
In the olden era, society's elite or rich, were merely considered the older males who took up residence in areas or communities that reeked of high rent and social status. These people chose to stay in these areas thus creating a genre of wealthy status. As time progressed, a newer generation of wealthy people moved into those communities. With
them, they bought their new attitudes and own ideologies of what being wealthy should be like. During this time, people's level of wealth changed, but their happiness levels remained the same.
For the most part, being rich or wealthy doesn't guarantee happiness. Society's mindset has been programmed to think that they will be happy if we can attain all of the material things that require the most amount of money. Society has maintained its own standards within communities, to consider one to be rich or wealthy. This article has given focus to our individual quest to obtain the luxury lifestyle. It is in depths look at equating happiness with obtaining material possessions versus happiness in other areas of ones life.
A definition of luxury is defined as something that is an indulgence rather than a necessity or living with things that are not really needed. How can one give a defense of something that isn't necessary and compare it with happiness or being content? Happiness is attained just like the life of luxury. In all actuality, you don't need to be happy. You seek out stimuli to make you feel good. "Luxury is no longer something 'out there,' restricted by income levels, personal wealth, or spending budgets. It's an experience everyone wants and believes they deserve." (Danziger).
Can we actually be happy having reached the ladder of success in terms of material possessions? Living the life of luxury has nowadays been abused and overrated. Because there is nothing else to look forward to in terms of living in the highest of luxury, many are seeking the life like it used to be. Nowadays, we see many things that that we saw in the past. We can now walk into a clothing store and notice something that we have worn or seen when we were young children. A good example of this is the vintage clothing. This clothing represents a time when our society was not focused on spending a large amount of cash for a pair of jeans or a t-shirt. We are now trying to reserve what once was because there's nothing else to look forward to. Have we run out of ideas? Has society reached its highest point in terms of what it can accomplish? Anyone can formulate their individual opinions towards this question. In my opinion, society will never reach that highest point of luxury because this is an on going process.
In the article of "The Free Market, In Defense of Luxury", Mayer concludes that "many things that seem like necessities today were once luxuries".
This statement puts a valid defense to luxuries. For example: the television was once owned by the wealthy or fortunate. It was considered a luxury to own a television. Many people looked forward toward achieving the goal of purchasing something that not many people had or were able to afford. This concept or ideology is supported by (Mieses) in the article who says that "luxury is highly dependent on time and place."
Mr. Twitchell states that "To live in a life of luxury is to create a system that relies on social influences." In our society, we will always create a system that relies on the opinions of others. Mr. Twitchell sums up this point concluding "Individuals are social animals who interact with and are influenced by the flock, the tribe, the in-crowd." Society's mindset is to be influenced by each other. Everything we do is affected by someone else. We need each other to survive within our own species. The consumption of goods is how we consider growth and economic
endurance.
Society and communities will always create a system that allows some form of hierarchy. This behavior is innate because of who we are. We are social beings. We rely on each other for support, guidance, leadership, and the like. This behavior exists everywhere, even in the small villages of Cambodia, Africa, and India. We are responsible for creating a system that allows others to afford the things we don't need. Just imagine what the world would be like without this system in place? Or just see the world as it really is. Our society is corrupt because of the ways we think and the things we do to produce luxury. When we acquire luxury, we also acquire the mindset of being superior to those that are not fortunate enough to obtain what we have. According to the article "Oh, The Good Life", Rebecca Gardyn concludes that the purpose of owning luxury to be extremely lavish and self-indulgent. That means that these people or masses are expressing their individualities. It makes them feel superior to the less fortunate.
We now live in a fast paced society. We all have or will seek to attain the better things in life. We have created a system that relies on our individual opinions about things that makes us feel different from others when attained. Luxury in our society gives us something to look forward to or to seek out. It allows our society to progress, expand, and develop.