Preview

The True Gospel of Wealth: Andrew Carnegie.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
696 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The True Gospel of Wealth: Andrew Carnegie.
U.S History

September 17,2012

The True Gospel of Wealth: Andrew Carnegie

The True Gospel of Wealth, an article written by one of the richest, most powerful men of the 19th century, is a guide to a nation virgin to mass amounts of wealth, and power. Carnegie is a self made millionaire, who immigrated to the United States with less than a dollar in his pocket. This fact would serve important in Carnegies epic rise to fortune, also in developing such philosophical understandings as, The True Gospel of Wealth.

Andrew Carnegie was a firm believer in idea of individualism. That everyman must work and rise on his own ambition alone, that each man for themselves. In other word, he did not believe in the communist thought of working for the wealth of your brotherhood. Carnegie describes it as evolution of the human class. That it is beyond human control to determine the distribution of wealth. It is good for a nation to have, one end the wealthy, while on the other side, the poor. In this, our nation has grown to know a higher grade of living than what our forefathers experienced. Carnegie goes on to say,

“The poor enjoy what the rich could not before afford. What were the luxuries have become the necessities of life. The laborer has now more comforts than the farmer had a few generations ago.”

This passage explains Carnegie’s idea that as the rich get richer, the poorer ultimately reap the benefits of this evolutionary growth of class. This, in fact, depended entirely upon the mode of distribution of wealth the rich man chooses.

Moreover, Carnegie explains that there are three different modes of distribution a rich man can employ. The first mode described, a bestowment of fortune to the first son. Which was a common practice during many years of a stringent class system in Great Britain. This ultimately led to a burden of wealth amongst rich who have no conscientiousness of how critical proper distribution of wealth is for evolutionary

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. How did Carnegie justify the accumulation of wealth? Carnegie believed that people were born with certain attributes that would lead them to be successful in their lifetime. He also mentioned the idea that we as human beings should accept the conditions that are placed in front of us and work around them to achieve the impossible.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Carnegie, Andrew. “Gospel of Wealth.” Hist 202 U.S.: A Narrative History Vol. 2 Ed. Jennifer Pickel. Boston: McGraw Hill, 2012: 13-14. Print.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carnegie and Frick

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Andrew Carnegie wasn't just a supporter of the Gospel of Wealth, he wrote the Gospel of wealth. He stressed that charity should not be giving money to individuals, but using the money yourself to make a difference. One must grow his industry, not flagrantly give money to individuals.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This quote shows the author’s point that Andrew Carnegie was a wise man used his experiences to better benefit his companies.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    People were given places to stay and freedom from supression, freedom from their overbearing government's. At first there were plenty of German and Scandinavian immigrants, however, the Gilded Age saw newcomers including Italians, Baltic, Slavic, and Chinese people. They were able to hope that they too could be a captain or at least be of assistance to their families and get that American Dream Carnegie, Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, and Vanderbilt had. Andrew Carnegie’s, Gospel of Wealth, in 1889 concluded that it would be immoral for the men to hoard riches to themselves Furthermore recalling that, “his judgement, is best calculated to produced the most beneficial results for the community” (Document C). Carnegie was capable of placing his money where his mouth was and donated a total of $350 million. If he was really such a vile, corrupt, shrewd being he would not have made any contribution to society. The world's richest man used his money he accumulated in an exemplary way, to assist the growth for knowledge by donating to universities, and public…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Andrew Carnegie was the epitome of the “self-made man.” Karl Marx has been dubbed “the father of communism.” Carnegie was a capitalist at heart, while Marx strongly believed in socialist and communist ideals. These men are clashing opposites, yet both men share several points in common. But when it comes to Carnegie’s and Marx’s stances on distribution of wealth and role of government in the economy, their views are on both ends of the spectrum. I believe Carnegie’s and Marx’s economic and social circles influenced their theories.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is shown in the fact that 68.7 percent of the world’s population only holds three percent of the wealth in the world and only 8.4 percent of the world’s population has 83.3 percent of the wealth of the world (Doc 6). The 68.7 percent of the world with the least amount of money often works in factories for very low wages, these factories being owned by the most wealthy. This relates to how those who get ahead have to step on others, with the wealthy exploiting the poor for their wealth.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life Andrew Carnegie

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Carnegie was a man with a strong outlook on how the wealthy should utilize their abundant amounts of cash. Although there were many other ways to dispose of the surplus of cash from the wealthy he favored mainly one. He believed that if the wealthy people in America would spend money through out their life on not only themselves but to also help the communities and charities, that they would become more respected through their life and also help America’s economy stay strong There were also a few different ways that people choose to pass on their money, one of which the wealthy would leave the surplus of money, once they deceased, to a loved one through a will. Carnegie’s outlook on this was not agreeable mainly because he believed that the person that would inherit the money would utilize it in the wrong ways and would not be grateful for what their loved one that left it to them did to gain it in the first place. Another way the wealthy would pass on their money would be to leave it to a charity after the passed away. Once again Carnegie did not agree to this method as well. He believed that it was a better way to pass on the surplus of cash, but not the best. He believed that the person that donated the money after they passed should have been donating the money all through out their life, and by not doing so makes it seem like he wanted to be buried with it. Carnegie believed his method of utilizing the wealth through out life was the better path, because not only would the rich man be helping the community through out their lives but also once they pass away. The rich man would also become very respected and popular while utilizing Carnegie’s method, and in the end very famous usually leading to some sort of…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This concept of social darwinism said that if you were born and raised poor, you would stay poor forever and would never be able to become rich. The first Document, Document B shows how society was separated in 1800s. It says that the poor people had it worse. In this document he comes across as arguing that he is rich and that it was better and he was better than everyone else. Carnegie is basically saying that social darwinism is a good thing. The second document, Document M, shows the 3 ways of what a man can do with his money when he dies. The first option of what you can do with your money is to leave it for your family. Carnegie thought that this option was the worst of them all. He believed that if you left your money for your children, then they would not know the value of it. He wanted them to work for their money and understand the hard work it takes. The second option was to leave your money for charity. This was also not the best option. Carnegie said that if you leave all your money for charity, you are basically saying that I should take my money with me, but if I can’t take it with me, I might as well just leave it. This is a nice gesture, but not really at the same time. The person could have been donating to charity while they were alive, rather than giving it becuase they have no use for it when they are dead. The best option that Carnegie believed in was to give your…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prosperous people should try and interpret the views of the less fortunate and make an effort to help them, maybe not on a personal basis, but instead for the general public. Should the wealthy people’s morals include helping the poor? Andrew Carnegie wrote the essay “The Gospel of Wealth.” The introduction announces Carnegie’s main idea, “His proposal is that such men should give their wealth back to the community for its benefit in the form of institutions that would contribute to “the improvement of the race,” (p. 342). Many people agree with Carnegie’s idea.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carnegie recognizes the importance of understanding the system as it is today but takes a look back into the past where the employer worked with the employees and were subjected to the same conditions. He discusses further and compares America as it was in the past, a land of hope to today’s capitalism that has denied the poor a chance to rise. In his work, he notes that the problem that has come with this age is the administration of wealth problem, where wealth is tied to brotherhood, binding the rich and the poor in such a relationship. He notes that the conditions of the humans have been revolutionalized in the past centuary where, in the past, there was little difference in food, dressing, dwelling places and the environment. Notably, today he notes that a millionaire owns palaces while his laborers live in cottages. He explores this as a result that has come with civilization and looks at the society today as inevitable but unfair. Carnegie notes that whether we may wish to go back to the old times, the present is inevitable and that it is a waste of time to criticize the…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benjamin Franklin’s, “The Way to Wealth” essay talks about the taxes in which Americans had to pay but ways to make their earnings worthwhile. One of the steps to wealth is the line between getting help from others and helping ourselves. The essay informs of the extent to which outside people or institutions assist people on the way to wealth.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another point that appealed and I found to be relevant in today’s society was Marx’s ideas on class distinction. With the acceptance that “10% of the people have 100% of the property”, this ratio of figures has definite parallels in today’s means of class distinction and in particular wealth; with 20% of the United States population having almost 90% of the wealth. The stratification Marx underlines is comparable to the outlined differences seen in society this modern day.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The focus of my paper is to discuss about how wealth should be distributed. There is no real answer to should wealth be evenly distributed or distributed according to class and status?. I picked this topic because of my experience have had with wealth in my family. I personally believe wealth should be evenly distributed. If it is evenly distributed, everybody is going to have equal opportunity in life.…

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    social change outline

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The problem in the U.S. is not that a minority has grown super rich, but that for decades now, it has done so to the detriment of the lower social class” (Arora 90)…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays