Preview

Andrew Carnegie: A Hero Or Hero?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1286 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Andrew Carnegie: A Hero Or Hero?
A hero is a person who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements or noble qualities. These heros put their best selves forward in service to help humanity. Heros take action on behalf of others that are in need. Andrew Carnegie was in fact was a hero. This subject can be controversial because of the fact that Carnegie gave away money after he died, and not while he was alive. Carnegie started off in a very poor family and eventually became very wealthy. This shows the world that anyone can be rich, even if they were born into a poor family. Andrew Carnegie reached a high level of success in money and power and is considered a hero because he showed the qualities of a hero like being caring and generous by donating his money …show more content…

This concept of social darwinism said that if you were born and raised poor, you would stay poor forever and would never be able to become rich. The first Document, Document B shows how society was separated in 1800s. It says that the poor people had it worse. In this document he comes across as arguing that he is rich and that it was better and he was better than everyone else. Carnegie is basically saying that social darwinism is a good thing. The second document, Document M, shows the 3 ways of what a man can do with his money when he dies. The first option of what you can do with your money is to leave it for your family. Carnegie thought that this option was the worst of them all. He believed that if you left your money for your children, then they would not know the value of it. He wanted them to work for their money and understand the hard work it takes. The second option was to leave your money for charity. This was also not the best option. Carnegie said that if you leave all your money for charity, you are basically saying that I should take my money with me, but if I can’t take it with me, I might as well just leave it. This is a nice gesture, but not really at the same time. The person could have been donating to charity while they were alive, rather than giving it becuase they have no use for it when they are dead. The best option that Carnegie believed in was to give your …show more content…

Documents N and O show Carnegie helping the poor and donating to his community and other places. Document N is a part of Carnegie’s Philanthropy. This chart was created by Joseph Frazier Wall in 1970. This chart is showing how generous Carnegie was by giving away $350,685,653 to Princeton University, TIAA, Dunfermline Trust, Homestead Relief Fund, Church organs, Carnegie Peace Endowment, Universities of Scotland, Teacher’s Pension fund, Carnegie Institution, Free Public libraries, Carnegie Corporation and much more. The Carnegie Corporation’s net assets in 2005 were listed as $2,167,000,000. The foundation is currently giving out about $100,000,000 a year with most of it used for education. The next document, Document O is a political Cartoon from The Saturday Globe in 1892. This cartoon is showing Carnegie lowering the wages that he gave to his employees by 2%. Lowering these wages would help Carnegie donate more money to his community. This shows that Carnegie was a hero because he gave and is still giving his money to people who need it. Carnegie knew that he would not live forever and he had no use for his money after he died, so he decided to use it before he died on things that were important to him. In Conclusion, Carnegie most definitely earns the title of hero. He deserves this title because of his kindness, generosity and willingness to give. Even though Carnegie believed in Social Darwinism,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He created a stronger type of steel that was not only the most effective, but the most efficient as well. Andrew Carnegie also had a strategy of his own. He believed that the only way to become a great businessman was to control monopolies and control the step of the process in materials. Carnegie definitely had a different side to him. He was a cruel businessman to his workers and a very kind philanthropist. He would poorly pay his workers, as well as leave them poorly housed. Carnegie was really never close to his workers and the wages that they had were very low compared to other steel industries. Nevertheless, he believed that "the man who dies rich, dies disgraced and a rich man should use his money for the benefit of others" (Youngs 33.) In Carnegies older years, he devoted himself entirely to his philanthropist's beliefs' after he sold his business. Carnegie built libraries around the world, but focused especially on the United States. He opened up galleries, museums, music halls, and technical schools. He also encouraged research and higher learning to others. Carnegie also established a donation to permanently seek an end to war. His donations totaled about 350 million…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    All men are created equal – that is, unless you subscribe to Andrew Carnegies ideas put forth in the 1889 essay “The Gospel of Wealth.” Carnegie (2010) wrote that some people are “unworthy” while others are “the highest type of man, the best and most valuable of all that humanity has yet accomplished” (p. 395). Carnegie’s (2010) belief in social Darwinism and “survival of the fittest” (p. 393) seemed to convince him that because he had achieved wealth, he was the most fit or qualified to determine the best distribution for it. However, Carnegie’s ideas on wealth distribution do not address many societal problems, especially poverty. Poverty was better addressed by John Galbraith (2010), Harvard economics professor and John F. Kennedy advisor, who had differing views on wealth distribution (pp. 405-415). Because Galbraith had a more compassionate view toward all people, he would likely criticize Carnegie’s ideas on distribution of wealth and modify Carnegie’s investments in the public sector. Galbraith’s overall view was also more true to the gospel than Carnegie’s views as expressed in “The Gospel of Wealth.”…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Carnegie grew up in Dunfermline, Scotland and immigrated along with his family to the United States in the late 1800s. He worked his way up from being a poor Irish immigrant to become one of the most famous philanthropists that helped transform the U.S steel industry in the late 19th century. Andrew Carnegie was a hero in many ways. One reason why Andrew Carnegie was a hero was because of his influences on renovating the American steel industry which helped create the U.S a world power. Secondly, Andrew Carnegie was a hero is because he helped create jobs that employed many Americans. Finally, Carnegie was a hero because he was one of the most influential philanthropists.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gospel of Wealth: Carnegie’s philosophy that the millionaire had a duty to distribute wealth while still alive.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew CARNEGIE

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Carnegie doesn’t only have his good side; he’s done many things people weren’t happy with. While Carnegie provided thousands with jobs, he cheated people from there money. Carnegie was a greedy man with his money. He paid them low wages, had them working in dangerous conditions without any safety equipment. He didn’t provide them with any kind of breaks, workers and they worked up to 12 hours, six to seven days a week.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A hero is a character that embodies key traits valued his or her society. For instance, General Lee is considered a hero, because he stood, against all odds, for his state. General Grant, likewise, is a hero, because he was successful in ending the Civil War.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Carnegie has a very unique perspective pertaining to the wealth in America and its distribution. Not only is he concerned about how much money is put to good use, but when; such as if the person donating the money is in life or after death. The “Gospel of Wealth” brings perspective of the nation’s money recirculation and the worth of a man by his generosity while living.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Would you consider someone who took from the people, who are the backbone of his company, and gave what he took, away, a hero? Andrew Carnegie is a self made billionaire who led the industrial revolution. He made steel cheaper and more available. Although he may have had a great impact in history, the path he took to achieve these great feats was anything but heroic. A hero is someone who puts themselves in harm’s way to protect or enhance someone else’s way of life. In my opinion, Andrew Carnegie was not a hero.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carnegie had the skills to be a successful business man. Even from a young age, he worked as hard as he could to support his family. Pictures from the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh (Document A) shows where Carnegie was born in Scotland. He lived in a small cottage with his family and resided in the attic from 1835 to 1848. The following picture displays the grand and luxurious Skibo Castle that Carnegie purchased in 1897. In about less than half a century, Carnegie became rich after living in poverty. Heroes have an extraordinary capability that few others possess and for Carnegie, his capabilities lied in the world of business. However, just because of that, it doesn’t make one a hero. In addition to that, heroes do not take advantage of their skill to benefit only themselves. It is apparent in Carnegie’s article for the North American Review, “Wealth” in June of 1889 (Document B) that he sincerely believed that business being in the hands of few was a beneficial thing. It is not that he did not care about his workers at all and purposefully tried to take advantage of their labor, he really believed that good came out of the rise of the wealthy. He says, “(I)t is to this law (of competition) that we owe our wonderful material development, … while the law may be sometimes hard for the individual, it is best for the race, because it insure the survival of the fittest in every department”. Carnegie truly thought that those who work hard and…

    • 689 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Why does Carnegie think it is better to build public institutions than to give charity to the poor?…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think that There are Two Sides to Every Hero. Carnegie had courage to do whatever it took and in his later life he had concern for others because he gave away all his money. Although, he lacked integrity because in his working years he only cared about himself and his money. This is still important because he as a big part of our history believe it or not. Heroism is also a big part in our lives because who doesn’t have a hero and it’s always around us in some shape or form. Honestly, you don’t have to care what I think because you may think that Andrew Carnegie was a horrible person and that’s fine because it’s your point of view a hero can have different qualities it’s all up to you it’s your hero not…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I first came to SA on November 27, 1992, and I've been sober ever since. When someone asks me what I've done to stay sober, my answer is always the same: "I don't know. I did not do it; I have a Higher Power Jewish Manwho shows me that He can do it." I thank God every day for my sobriety—but I'm in a very hard place today.…

    • 2778 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Carnegie Essay

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The central thesis of the essay focused on the dangers of wealthy entrepreneurs simply passing on their fortune to their children, or other persons and organizations that were not qualified to handle it. Instead of wasting money on frivolous expenses and using it inefficiently, Carnegie argued that such money should be put towards the public good. Thus, even as capitalism could indeed hurt some while benefiting others, poverty could in fact be tackled and solved by the very wealthy businessmen that had contributed to the problem.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alms are “money, clothes, food, and other things given to poor people” (Merriam-Webster Dictionary). Alms giving occurs with the Salvation Army, soup kitchens, food dispensaries, welfare, and a variety of other public assistance programs. Churches provide these items to those in need. I understand the premise that Carnegie presented. He was providing his beliefs that the philanthropist is not to waste money towards those who are not willing to help him…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Income Inequality

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the essay “The Gospel of Wealth” Andrew Carnegie says that the rich should invest their money to do good for the public (396). He argues that the rich should do something with their money instead of put it to waste when they die. Many people tend to not enjoy their money; they save until one day they realize it is too late. Carnegie believes that this money should be put into good instead of waste. One way that Carnegie mentions that the rich should do is charity. He used the example of a free public library in New York City to support his argument. A public library helps families and children economically, and educationally. If the children get the education they need they have better opportunities and less chance of living in poverty in the near future. Carnegie tries to convince us that; if the rich invest money into improving the community then there will be a slight chance of less poverty. I agree, but it also depends on the person. Some people take advantage of the help they are getting from government or even from higher class society. Carnegie idea could work but it may also backfire and make things worse. If the poor start to rely on the rich to help them with their problems, they may not do anything about it because they know there will be someone to “bail” them out of trouble. This is a bad thing because people would not want to start making effort to start doing better. A great example in America today is unemployment. Today the citizens receive unemployment money if they are layed or fired. Carnegie might say many people take advantage of…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays