Georgia decision, Mandery reveals that Justice Stewart and White met and agreed to join the majority to repeal the death penalty. According to Mandery, White told Stewart that he will not vote against the death penalty on moral grounds, but will write an opinion if it’s struck down on procedural grounds only. The decision of Furman V. Georgia was a deemed unconstitutional because of it was arbitrary, which caused states to rewrite their laws about the use of capital punishment. Mandery explains that 37 states passed death penalty laws after the Furman decision. For example, some states made the death penalty mandatory for all capital offenses in order treat all murders the same. In addition, states adopted some guided discretion and aggravating factors for the use of the death penalty. After the decision of Furman V. Georgia, the public support for capital punishment rose and Mandery notes that this occurred because of the increase of violent crimes in
Georgia decision, Mandery reveals that Justice Stewart and White met and agreed to join the majority to repeal the death penalty. According to Mandery, White told Stewart that he will not vote against the death penalty on moral grounds, but will write an opinion if it’s struck down on procedural grounds only. The decision of Furman V. Georgia was a deemed unconstitutional because of it was arbitrary, which caused states to rewrite their laws about the use of capital punishment. Mandery explains that 37 states passed death penalty laws after the Furman decision. For example, some states made the death penalty mandatory for all capital offenses in order treat all murders the same. In addition, states adopted some guided discretion and aggravating factors for the use of the death penalty. After the decision of Furman V. Georgia, the public support for capital punishment rose and Mandery notes that this occurred because of the increase of violent crimes in