Aa

Some people think that changing people’s attitudes to other countries and cultures is an important factor in reducing world poverty. Others, however, feel that the most important method is trade. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Regarding the issue of how to reduce poverty worldwide more effectively, people hold different views. Some of them claim that the best way is to cement international relationship in term of getting better mutual understanding and their national identities,while others contend that the optimum solution is to get spur trade. This essay will examine both sides of arguments and try to reach a conclusion. On the one hand, if the nations over the world accelerate a better relationship, this step will have far-reaching influences on poverty eradication and hunger alleviation. For example, the countries can carry out cultural exchanges, namely art exhibition or football friendlies matches. In terms of education, the rich nation should enable for young generation in the poor country, such as my homeland – Viet Nam, access to an advanced education and the new technologies in developed country. As a result, this help cultivate links among nations and strengthen mutual understanding and mutual interests. Futhermore, this will provide more job creation in not only the developing coutries but also the developed nations. On the other hand, international trade occupies a crucial role in cause of poverty reduction in the whole world only by reinforce international relationship and creat an equal position in bilateral trade and multilateral trade then trade can break up all barriers by enhance commercial works, different countries in the world can learn to build up mutual trust and win-win option, which causes abundant job. A typical instance for this is the rich nation can import agriculture products from Southest Asia such as Viet Nam or Thailand, which produce profound bargain on money in these countries and reduce poverty. I am of the opinion that, both of the above factors have the same importance but the most special capital probably is give a boost to international trade in technology tranference and skills for the developing countries. If the poor coutries find it difficult in expanding technological expentise and working skills, the imbalanced among the developind nation still continue and poverty levels keep unchanged. In conclusion, the both sides have valid arguments to substantiate their point of views. However, considering a consistenly world today that is having profound effect in developing international trade, I would support the view that it is high time the government paid attention to further promote trade.