10.10.12
“It is every American’s right and obligation to interpret the constitution for their selves” ,said by Thomas Jefferson. Interpretations are subjective, but what may be relevant in these interpretations, are required to be revolutionary. The question is, was the constitution not revolutionary? Therefore is it not still relevant? I believe the constitution is the most influential and relevant documentation in America, to present day. The constitution was collectively processed through several people, giving more input and thought. It limits government power, but still can be amended. The constitution also states and protects our natural rights; and relevancy is all subjective to society, but as history shows, society repeats itself, making the constitution just as relevant as it was in 1787.
One does not need to be a genius, but if in a situation where several team up they can create something just as brilliant. The constitution’s brilliance of never ending relevance starts with its limitations of government but still being able to be amended, there are three methods in which the constitution sought to limit the area of power in the three organs of government, all through the bill of rights, system of checks and balances, and federalism. Are we not, one nation that takes pride in equality, not only with other nations but internally as well? As a collective, we consistently change; therefore the option to have a system to change with us is of paramount importance; in which our constitution fulfills this need.
The freedom of freedom sounds quite euphoric it in a united community and for something to protect that euphoria is an even better sound. “The constitution is colorblind, and never knows nor tolerates classes among citizens”, a quote from John Marshall. As it limits governments’ power, it also protects the natural rights we are promised at birth. Fair government ensures justice. Rules to government ensure boundaries. Bill of Rights outlines our freedom. My cousin Chad Todd was arrested up to 3 years ago, convicted for 40 years on the count of association with a breaking and entering crime. Through a fair trial, he reduced twenty years off of his charges and is liable for parole. Even with the darkness in the situation, justice and rights show us the light. Without the constitution, America’s system of government would face huge turmoil.
Relevancy is subjective to society, in which society is circulation of itself. Mistakes are mad, and there will always be a rise and decline, but how long you can sustain from reaching the decline while at your peak, shows how strong of a country you are. “Constitutional democracy, you see, is no romantic nation. It’s our defense against ourselves, the one foe who might defeat us”, a quote from Bill Moyers. Is the image in the mirror not the most perceptionized? Is relevancy not subjective? Bill Moyers describes the democracy that is ran is the constitution is protected ourselves, hence our own downfall. But if we revolve around what we think is relevant, then we become revolutionary. This isn’t about relevance at all, it’s about, has the constitution gave America a revolution and have we honored it since then. And since 1784, the constitution has not been revoked, and if still up for changes, need there be one, because it is the back bone of America’s revolution in itself. It is all the more relevant than you or I and the input we have in this country.
The constitution is relevant, now more than it has ever been. It limits government’s power, giving the people and equal opportunity in society. It’s amendable, changing and adapting with time. The constitution protects our natural rights: Fair government, rules of government, and Bill of Rights. It finally keeps society functioning through its peak and not reaching its decline. Therefore all of these prove that the constitution is still relevant.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Without the decisions the government made together we would've never came into an equal equality, without solving the world’s biggest problems. In the summer of 1787 , fifty five delegates representing twelve of the thirteen states met in philadelphia to fix the national gov’t. The problem was that the government under the articles of confederation, the challenge was to create a strong central government without letting anyone get too much power. How did the Constitution Guard against Tyranny? In further reading you will see how they divided the powers that were given to them to help the nation and states around the world, that fills up the world’s problems.…
- 630 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the book “A Brilliant Solution: Inventing the American Constitution” by Carol Berkin she explains the constitution from start to finish from how it all began, to the debates inside the convention and finally the end product. Berkin takes the reader and puts him directly in the middle of the convention of 1786; throughout the book you can feel the excitement, the frustration, the tensions between delegates and the overall commitment to making a new government work for all.…
- 1012 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
For anyone who has taken Civics or an American Government class in high school, should know how important the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights are to this country. “When in the Course of human events”, “We hold these truths to be self-evident”, “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”, and “We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union” should be some of the most recognizable phrases written in some of the most significant documents in history (www.LOC.gov and www.Archives.gov). In the book Judicial Tyranny: The New Kings of America by Mark Sutherland, readers are able to understand what the true role of government should have been and should be for the future as intended by our Founding Fathers. With chapters written by some of the most prominent and notable judges, attorneys, politicians, authors, theologians and most importantly, Christians, readers see the…
- 1559 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In this essay, Tribe and Dorf describe our nation’s Constitution as a document that continues to dynamically work to achieve a balance between governmental power and individual liberty. Founding fathers like Madison and Jefferson also look to the constitution as a distinct outline, instead of a blueprint. The amendments and bills that comprise it tend to be very vague and open to interpretation of what some definitions actually mean. This leads to a lot of disputes throughout history of what the Constitution and its words stand for.…
- 436 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1787, the members of the Federal Convention knew that the Articles of Confederation were severely lacking what was essential for a successful government and nation. Knowing this, the convention looked to the past to construct a constitution for a young and ever changing country. The Founding Fathers’ were influenced by the Romans, the English and many others along the way, hoping that they would be more successful at producing liberty, order, and justice. The result is the long standing Constitution that has guided America and the government through the founding to present day.…
- 651 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
By ensuring that the legislature contains both equal and proportional representation and finding a way to give both the federal government and the individual states a voice through Dual Levels of Federalism, the United States Constitution manages to reconcile the varied interest groups, small states and big states, Localists and Federalists to form a more perfect union.…
- 2487 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The US Constitution is one of the most influential documents in the history of modern governance. The system of government established by the writers of this document not only reflected and helped to ensure the hopes and desires of many citizens of the newly independent American state, but, perhaps more importantly, this system has served as a dramatic symbol for those people throughout the world who have struggled against tyranny and oppression ever since. This document has also served as a model for the creation of new governments over the past two hundred years. Nevertheless, some scholars, including Howard Zinn and Charles Beard, who wrote An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution, contend that this document is not the democratic mantra that its supporters proclaim it to be. These critics argue that the Constitution was designed primarily to protect the economic interests of the aristocracy, not only from the tyranny of the government, but also from the political pressures of the lower classes. They point to the ideas of the separation of powers, federalism, and checks and balances as being primarily ways in which the elites of American society could insulate themselves from the will of the common people rather than efforts to protect against tyrannical government. These scholars also look to the writings of James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton in The Federalist Papers to support their contentions. Finally, they look to the actions of some of the founding fathers, like Washington, Hamilton, Adams, and even Jefferson to find support for this theory. During this unit, we will examine this evidence in order to assess the validity of this theory as compared to the more traditional views of most Americans. As always, finding the truth requires a delicate balance of inquisitiveness, interpretation, speculation, and appreciation for subtlety. There are seldom…
- 1742 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
The way at which we are governed needs to be changed. A better form of government is necessary, one that can unite our states, weigh the competing interests with justice, and stabilize the nation's finances. The Articles were formed as a week way of governing ourselves. Now it's time for us to rid ourselves of this burden and come out strong. Under the Articles we have no central government, which enables us to prosper. For us to grow as one country we must be united. As of now we are but more than one government, each with our own laws, money, and taxes. The Articles are not a strong enough backbone to help us thrive into one nation, so we must come together as whole. Just one government is the wisest choice in our beginning.…
- 569 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In Charles A. Beard’s article, “Framing the Constitution,” he suggested that there is a dichotomy between the values of the Constitution and those of the Declaration of Independence, who believed that the Constitution was a document that was only created to protect the framers’ wealth. He articulated that the reason rich framers wanted to protect against majority rule was to prevent the majority from overthrowing the rich. His purpose was to examine the circumstances and conflicting goals and ideals of the time, and how they were resolved and agreed upon in the Constitution. His analysis was very persuasive, as it effectively argued that importance of the circumstances at hand, as well as comprehensive, in that in articulates the issues and solutions of the time.…
- 261 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
as you might think. The Constitution gets most of its ideas from past documents. Without these other documents, we would not have the same constitution we have today. Without these documents, we would have a second Articles of Confederation. Without these documents, our country would be completely different.…
- 629 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Prior to the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation provided the states with too much power, not granting the central government the ability to make decisions. The Constitution is significant because it provides the central government with power while ensuring individual justice through the 27 Amendments and the Bill of Rights. Since 1787 when it was ratified by our Founding Fathers, the Constitution has continued to be relevant today by granting the government power to make decisions and by providing individual freedoms and liberties to the American…
- 1039 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In school, as well as throughout our daily lives, we learn in America to live by the idea of freedom and equality for all. We do not allow race, class, or creed to determine a person’s stature in the community. It may seem as if this is the standard of society, but these ideas of equality have been fought over since the beginning of written history, and even in America today, prejudice still exists. To address these and similar problems, the founding fathers of this nation created a Constitution which included laws that dealt with individual freedoms. However great the founding fathers envisioned the United States Constitution, it did not form a perfect union and justice for all. America would have to amend, or add to, the Constitution in order to serve its constituents better. The most powerful constitutional act towards equality would come with the fourteenth amendment. This amendment permanently changed constitutional law by empowering the Federal government’s jurisdiction to include local and state governments which would be required to abide by new standards of civil rights and privileges.…
- 1190 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Democratic Gazette Sabeena Jagdeo The Constitution: Key to Our Success Last night, President Johnson gave his Third Annual Message speech, ensuring the American citizens that the Constitution will remain a part of the United States, and by doing so, it will help further the country's success. The fact of the matter is that, the Constitution serves as the basic law and regulation system for the United States. Without it, we have nothing to base our laws and values on, as Johnson continually stated in his message. To dissolve the Constitution, is to destroy our nation, it will only cause more conflict among the states rather than repairing the injuries between the northern and southern states which were caused by the war.…
- 482 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
I still remember being in an eighth grade U.S. History class back in my junior high years. One distinct memory of that course, perhaps the most memorable of all the projects we had, came in the first month of the school year, in the curriculum’s first unit: the founding of the United States as its own nation. As the textbook timeline approached 1787 we prepared ourselves for a daunting task: memorize and recite the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution. We as students would wait anxiously as, one by one, each of our peers would step up to the front of the classroom and begin to recite from memory. Few people could recite the Preamble smoothly, but for those who stumbled, we all seemed to remember perfectly the first and last chunks: “We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union…” and “…do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” To us back in eighth grade, that missing middle section was just a group of words to be more-or-less forgotten the next day. To our forefathers, however, that middle section was vital in creating the basis for the supreme law of the United States.…
- 1245 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
James Madison starts the federalist paper by stating that each branch should be for the most part independent. Madison also stated that no one branch should have too much power in selecting members of the other two branches. It would mean that the citizens should select the president, the legislators, and the judges. The members of each branch should not be too dependent on the members of the other two branches. Congress was split into two branches, the House of Representatives and the Senate, and provided for a different method of election in each branch. The best security against a gradual concentration of power in any one branch is to provide constitutional safeguards that would make such concentration difficult. The constitutional rights of all must check one man's personal interests and ambitions. We all know that men like to abuse power and the very need for government itself proves they overdo it because "if men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary"(Madison, 62). These branches should have the power to defend us from any intruders. The biggest problem with framing a government is that the government must be able to control the people, but equally important, must be able and forced to "control itself." "A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions" (Madison, 63).…
- 585 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays