The court perceives their town leader, the head of the church, Reverend Parris, as undoubtedly innocent because of his position as a man of God. In essence, through the implied promise of strict adherence to the word of God, he is absolved of the possibility of reasonable doubt in the face of crime. The court perceives Abigail’s innocence through her premise of purifying the town, that her actions are all in the interest of a greater good, and so by using her experiences and actions and distorting them to achieve martyrdom, she becomes so holy to the town of Salem, they refuse to believe she would be at fault. John Proctor calls attention to this hypocrisy by reminding the court essentially that is always true that all humans can and do sin, and that neither Parris nor Abigail are exempt from that truth, and so, refusing to hold an unbiased trial for those accused of witchcraft, they are handing to much power to the unbalanced biases a court of justice is expected to …show more content…
He had arrived in Salem to do the Lord’s holy work, and he brought with him only the best and purest ideals of the religion he preaches in order to save the townspeople, yet those gifts he was confident in caused death and the wrongful spilling of blood. In confessing that he caused the tragic outcomes because he advocated for the presence of the Devil in Salem while he remained silent and willfully ignorant of the plausible doubt of the accused's guilt, he called for the evil within himself and the members of the town to