Preview

Abolition Of Jurys

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
238 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Abolition Of Jurys
A jury is made up of 12 randomly selected men and women who have to sit in court, listen to evidence and use their common sense to determine whether or not the accused is guilty or not of the alleged crime.

The Jury system was first developed in England during the dark ages, around 800 years ago; back then the jurors had to investigate the case for themselves, however this is no longer the process. Due to the jury system being around for such a substantial amount of time, some may believe that it is working and is a good process when in the courts; however, others may think it’s time for a fundamental review. Juries only decide cases that are heard within the Crown Court, meaning that juries only decide the verdict on 1% of criminal cases, however, although 1% doesn’t seem like much, that still amounts to 30,000 trials. I will now go on to discuss the for and against the abolition of juries.
…show more content…
As the jurors are randomly selected it signifies a cross section of the local community and counteracts any chance of individual prejudices as jurors represent diverse

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    2. The Twelve jurors are given the job, by the judge, of deciding whether a teenage boy is innocent or guilty of killing his father. They must separate the facts from the fancy and provide a verdict of guilty if there is no reasonable doubt to the claims, or non-guilty if there is reasonable doubt. The decision must be unanimous. The charge against the defendant is Murder in the first degree – premeditated homicide (death sentence).…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Flaws

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Throughout the years of America, we had many juries during criminal trials to decide if the defendant guilty or not guilty. In the 1957 movie, 12 Angry Men shows the best representation of American jury system and how people change their minds. 12 Angry Men shows that personal feeling get in the way in their votes. The movie is about how 12 jurors decide the fate of young boy that persumed he killed his father, while during the initial vote only Juror 8 raised his hand not guilty. Then throughout the movie and script each of the 11 jurors for various reason change their votes to not guilty. The 12 jurors change their votes from guilty to not guilty through character flaws, positive personality traits, expertise on the evidence, and pattern of behavior.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wrightsman, L. E., Kassin, S.M, Willis, C.E (Ed.). (1987). In the jury box: Controversies in…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The law greatly reflects moral and ethical standards in relation to the use of juries as juries ensure an accused is judged by their peers and members of the community, however, the selection process in a jury can also result in a jury which does not fully reflect community standards. Under the Jury Act 1977 (NSW), any Australian citizen may be called to serve on a jury, and citizens are randomly selected from the electoral roll. This means that the jury is essentially a representation of the community and its interests, thus, enabling the views and opinions of society to be upheld when deciding a verdict. It also allows an accused to be judged by their peers and fellow citizens, instead of a judge, who may not be in touch with the ethical…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The jury system is simply a system in which the verdict in a legal case is decided by a group of twelve regular citizens(the jurors). A lot of questions have been asked about the validity and importance of the jury system. I think the jury system is not a good idea and should therefore be removed because the jurors sometimes do not consider or even understand the evidence provides. They often let their personal feelings affect their verdict, or base it on unreasonable factors, and…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict that is the opposite of what the jury believes or the verdict it was instructed to return by the court” (Rottenstein Law Group, 2014). In the course of a regular criminal trial, the judge will hand down some directives to the jury. The judge will inform the jury that they should set aside any feelings that they may take personal and achieve a decision exclusively in light of the truth displayed at trial. However, juries overlook these directions and clear criminals who plainly disobeyed the law. Current lawful guidelines firmly disapproval jury nullification and restrict encouragements for a jury panel to nullify the law. Therefore, a legal counselor may not, even with the within the…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since it has been used righteously in the past it is a hard decision to contemplate getting rid of it. If there was no jury nullification of any kind then the country would have missed out on juries taking a stand against poorly thought out laws. The answer is that jury nullification has played a dual roll in our history. At times it is a useful tool as in the cases involving slavery or differential prosecution, at times allowing racists to go free. So having weighed the merits of the situation it is best left as is currently. There is a real risk for overuse if everyone were aware of the power but in its absence the government would exercise too much power unbalanced by the power of the…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to numerous cases of jury misconduct being brought to light, serious questions about jury trials are being augmented. Jury misconduct can be explained as an infringement of the law of the court by any member of the jury, either while a court case is underway or after a verdict is out. To an extent, jury misconduct is compromising the public’s confidence in the jury system. This could be due to revelations of numerous internal and external factors such as biasness, social media influence, contempt of court and jury…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Are Juries Outdated

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Juries have been regarded as the cornerstone of our criminal justice system in Australia since 1824 when juries were first introduced, however many argue they are an outdated form of determining the outcome of trials. Some of the reasons why juries are outdated are that jurors don’t realise how long some trials go for and there are too many complex documents to consider in coming up with a verdict of some trials. Another reason is the people that serve on juries are the least qualified people.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    to guard against jury nullification or what may be characterized as a perverse acquittal, jury…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    juries

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juries are considered to encompass a fundamental role of the criminal justice system, however , there are setbacks regarding their role in determining whether the accused is guilty or innocent. Juries are a representation of public confidence, as the right to be tried by peers has people confident that their impartiality and fairness does improve access to justice. Impartiality of the jury is supported by the process of random selection which usually result in a cross-section of society, therefore prejudices are…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Common law juries have consisted of 12 people since the fourteenth century. The Supreme Court, however, authorized smaller juries in noncapital cases, but juries with less than six members are not permitted in criminal cases. Since that ruling, many states have specifically authorized juries of fewer than 12 jurors, but most allow these smaller juries only in misdemeanor cases. Some studies have found very few differences between six and twelve person juries, while others have reported significant deference’s.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Jury Selection

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The jury pool is initially chosen from among the community utilizing a random strategy. Jury records are gathered from voter enlistments and driver permit/state id. From these records, some people are mailed. They will be addressed in court by the judge and/or lawyers in the U.S. According to Shari Seidman, in some cases such as capital punishment, the jury must be death qualified. Jury procedures are taught in law institutions to law students. The jury chose is said to have been…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trial By Jury

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It isn’t arduous to see why some may question the efficiency of trial by jury and whether it should, and is able to, continue to discover innocence or guilt. Regarding the trial of Vicky Pryce, the failure of the jury within the hearing conjured ridicule and disdain from the judge and the media. The case deeply unsettled the trust of many in the system. The eight women and four men were dismissed after illustrating “fundamental deficits of understanding” (Jacobson, Hunter & Kirby, 2015, p. 55). Their profuse questions for the judge were deemed as unintelligent and unnecessary and so a costly re-trial was required. Consequently, this ordeal provoked a stronger desire for the abolition of trial by jury, to be replaced by a single judge as a more…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A jury is a body of persons sworn to inquire into a matter submitted to them and to give their verdict. Sociologists believe that most corruption can be seen in the jury process. The jury selection process is when people are chosen to serve on a trial jury. There are many methods to select these individuals to avoid an unfair trail. The pool is first selected at random choosing people from the community within the jurisdiction of the court. These perspective jurors are sent to summons, questioned thoroughly and obligated by law to appear in court on the specified date. The selection process is very important because the jurors will potentially be making a verdict that may or may not drastically change someone’s…

    • 2533 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics