Preview

Abortion and Infanticide - Potentiality Principle

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1929 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Abortion and Infanticide - Potentiality Principle
Michael Tooley's article, "Abortion and Infanticide" raised some points about the morality of abortion. He discussed the conservatives' ethical objection against abortion which states that fetuses and infants have a right to life. The conservatives believe that early abortion is immoral. In his article, he made a case against the conservative position on abortion. His case boils down to two claims:
(i) We should accept that early abortion is immoral only if we accept the "potentiality principle".
(ii) We should not accept this "potentiality principle".
In this essay, I will first discuss Tooley's arguments for these claims. After discussing the arguments, I will attempt to show that claim (i) is reasonable but claim (ii) is not. I will then propose a better argument for (ii) to strengthen Tooley's claims. To conclude, I will describe a typical objection to my argument and explain why this objection is invalid.
Tooley's Argument for Claim (i)
Tooley's argument for claim (i) stems from the conservative's assertion that adult humans possess a property which endows any organism possessing this property a serious right to life. From this claim, the conservative argues that any organism that has a potential to possess this property in the course of its development should also have a serious right to life. For simplicity, I shall call this argument the "potentiality principle". Tooley explained that this principle is very critical to the conservatives' argument because it allows them to defend their position without explicitly determining what properties a thing must possess to have a right to life. It is enough to define that adult human beings have this property and clearly they have a right to live. Therefore by the potentiality principle, it follows that the zygote of a human being must also have a right to life (Tooley, 1972). The potentiality principle is also very important according to Tooley because it not only provides support for the conservative's position



References: Tooley, M. 1972. Philosophy and Public Affairs. Vol. 2, No 1. Princeton University Press.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gooch, John, and Dorothy U. Seyler. Argument! 2nd Ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2011. Print.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The question between whether abortion is morally right or wrong has been talked about for years and no common ground has been made. Judith Thomson, a believer in Pro-choice, argues that abortion is not wrong because the mother should have a choice of what happens to her body. In response to this, Donald Marquis who is against abortion believes every fetus is a human with a right to have a future like ours. Each Ethicist gives examples and theories as to why abortion is wrong or right. In this essay, I will attempt to show that abortion is okay in some cases, and Donald Marquis’s views and arguments are broad and incorrect.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The goal of Judith Jarvis Thomson in her defense of abortion is to sway the ideas of those who are against abortion by challenging the arguments they give for thinking so. She begins by stating a premise. “For the sake of the argument” a human embryo is a person. This premise is one of the arguments most opponents of abortion use, but as she points out, isn’t much of an argument at all. These people spend a lot of their time dwelling on the fact that the fetus is a person and hardly any time explaining how the fetus being a person has anything to with abortion being impermissible. In the same breath, she states that those who agree with abortion spend a lot of their time saying the fetus is in fact not a person. Either way, no argument is really formed. No reasons are given. For sake of challenging an actual argument, she is disregarding this issue. With this premise out of the way, she addresses the basic argument the pro-choice campaign believes. “Every person has a right to life. So the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body; everyone would grant that. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother’s right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed.” The remainder of her paper is a series of analogies meant to challenge the basic argument mention above. When looking at the analogies separately, they are in no way related to the abortion topic, but the conclusions drawn from each can be applied. Because these examples aren’t directly related to the debate, our emotions won’t necessarily be involved and we can clearly think about what is the “right” thing to do for each specific scenario.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judith Jarvis Thompson and Don Marquis both have markedly different views on the topic of abortion. Thompson generally argues that there are cases where abortion may be morally permissible, due to the rights of the mother, while Marquis argues that abortion is almost always morally wrong, except under extraordinary circumstances, because the fetus has a future life. In this paper, I will evaluate the arguments of both parties, as well as identify what premises, if any, they both agree on. In addition, I will supply my own reasoning for why I believe that Marquis presents the more successful argument.…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jonathan Glover, in his article Matters of Life and Death casts dispersions on both pro-abortion and anti-abortion debates citing them as too knee-jerk emotional reactions diminishing the inherent complexity of the other side (1. Glover, CC2006, p. 0110). Glover comprehensively addresses the key points of both sides of the abortion debate and evaluates their inherent virtues, especially for those who hold these opinions, then methodically points out its flaws. Ultimately, Glover comes to the conclusion that though a fetus is a human at the moment of conception, the right to abort lies with the mother and her own self-determination.…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mary Anne Warren argues the position that abortion is morally permissible because the fetus is not a person therefore has no rights therefore not immoral to be killed. I shall argue that Warren’s position is invalid since her argument “appears to justify not only abortion, but infanticide as well.”…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the human race develops over time, improvements in medical technology have allowed abortion to become readily available to women across the developed world. In Don Marquis’ essay, “Why Abortion Is Immoral,” Marquis believes that it is possible to argue that even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is morally impermissible. According to Marquis, abortion is morally wrong because the process of abortion kills a being with a right to life and a “future like ours”. Despite this view however, it is possible to reject Marquis’ account of the wrongfulness of killing, because his argument focuses on the “future like ours” statement, and this is not applicable to every situation. Through potentiality, a fetus’ lack of awareness, and the lack…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) If a virtuous woman would – under the circumstance that pregnancy would inhibit her ability to pursue other virtuous tasks – have an abortion, then having an abortion is justified…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomson Abortion

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the biggest moral issue today is woman's rights with abortion. Many people argued for the rights to keep abortion while others argued for banning it. In the article "The Rights of a Woman Do Not Outweigh the Rights of A Child" by Judith Jarvis Thomson, who is a philosopher and invented an analogy for her debate, talks about how a child has more right than the mother in the case of abortion and that abortion is the same thing as "killing" , Thomson says. Thomson claims the idea that anyone can argue that all abortion is impermissible. The article "Abortions Should Be Restricted to Before Twenty Weeks Gestation" by Douglas Johnson who is…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    298). If this position is accepted, abortion is morally permissible as fetuses do not satisfy the conditions for personhood and there is no loss of a future. However under this umbrella, infanticide, the act of killing an infant, is morally permissible as they do not meet the criteria to be considered a person and fetuses and infants are intertwined within the same category. Although the terms Warren has outlined is accepted, it can be agreed upon that infants do possess a valuable future (although they are not termed as persons). Infants have the potential to have experiences, enjoyment, achievement and other values that would have constituted a future and the same can be implied to fetuses. By claiming abortion is morally permissible, and since a fetus does not satisfy the terms of being a person, it is ultimately accepting that it is morally permissible to commit infanticide, as both agents are not persons. These actions rob both a future and a life if the liberal position is accepted. I will now provide a reason as to why the loss of future is not a loss of a life by analyzing the mother’s future (or lack…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Readers of this essay should beware. You will find it easy to assume as you read that I am criticizing the assumptions common to Roe, Casey, and the popular anti-choice movement in order to support the platform of abortion choice. Nothing could be further from the truth. My analysis of the standard view will constitute the bulk of this essay. After that I shall offer a brief account of a replacement for the standard view that underwrites the prohibition of abortion choice. I shall contend that this replacement view remedies the deficiencies of the standard view. I shall also suggest that this replacement is far more plausible than the standard view for other reasons.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wolff, J. (2006) An introduction to political philosophy. 1st edn. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Since the legalization of abortion in 1973, over 56 million unborn children have been killed.” Their mothers never gave them chance to be born. Abortion has been a debatable topic for decades, but aborting a human being is morally wrong and medically unsafe.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fetus Rights

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Meyers, Chris. The Fetal Position: A Rational Approach to the Abortion Debate. Amherst, NY: Prometheus, 2010. Print.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis statements: Fetus removal has been a significant debate all through mankind's history. It raises a large group of moral issues since it includes the end of a likely human life. With regards to making a decision women ought…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays