Bravo Fernandez v. United States is a court case that deals with Double Jeopardy. Double Jeopardy can be defined as “the prosecution of a person twice for the same offense (dictionary.com). ” Bravo Fernandez v. United States was argued on October 4th, 2016, because of an incident that took place in May of 2005. Mr. Fernandez, whom is the president of a private security firm in Puerto Rico, and Hector Martinez-Maldonado who is a member of the Senate. Both traveled to Las Vegas to watch a boxing match. Mr. Fernandez and Mr. Martinez-Maldonado were indicted for the trips payment. The charges were violation of the federal bribery statute, conspiracy, and the Travel Act. These charges tied Mr. Martinez-Maldonado’s support of legislation beneficial…
In general, U.S. courts have long favored enforcement of arbitration awards. As the Second Circuit noted in Diapulse Corp. of America v. Carba, Ltd. 37 a case decided under the Federal Arbitration Act, [t]he purpose of arbitration is to permit a relatively quick and inexpensive resolution of contractual disputes by avoiding the expense and delay of extended court proceedings.... Accordingly, it is a well-settled proposition that judicial review of an arbitration award should be, and is, very narrowly limited. 38 As another court has expressed this view, "[lt is not the function of a district court to review the record of an arbitration proceeding for mere errors of law or fact."'39 These public policy concerns apply with even greater strength…
Summary: Marie-Claude operated a bowling alley in a commercial area that was adjacent to a residential area. Many small children used the parking lot near the bowling alley as a playground, and Marie-Claude was constantly tell these children leave the parking area maybe they will get injured. However, one six years old boy climb onto the flat roof of the bowling alley and while he is running, tripped and fell to the ground. But Marie-Claude continued to order the child off the roof by several times when he was on the roof.…
Justices of the United States Supreme Court are strategic actors who strive to secure policy outcomes as close to their preferred outcome as possible. Accomplishing this sometimes requires justices to not always pursue their true policy preferences and sometimes it requires justices to ignore legal and policy questions. In this essay, I will analyze how justices were strategic in a few landmark supreme court cases.…
Walker, S., & Kratz, C. M. (2008). The Police in America: An Introduction. New York, NJ: McGraw-Hill.…
The Supreme Court stressed that “Capital punishment must be limited to those offenders who commit ‘a narrow category of the most serious crimes’ and whose extreme culpability makes them ‘the most deserving of execution.’” The Supreme also solidified its decision based on the principle that juveniles lack maturity and understanding of responsibility. Juveniles are prone to be influenced by their…
The Supreme Court was presented with the case of Fischer vs. The University of Texas where Abigail Fisher was suing the University for discrimination in their affirmative action based admissions process. The Supreme Court voted 7-1 and ruled to send the case back to the lower courts for further review and put off making any final decisions to change the U.S. policy on affirmative action, a “longstanding but fragile societal compromise, one that forbids quotas but allows using race as one factor among many in the admissions process” (Laptik). Both articles discussed in length the constitutionality of the race-based admissions process as well as explaining the Supreme Court’s position on the matter. The justices made statements that explained that the admissions programs must be subject to strict scrutiny where the it can be determined that classification based on gender, race and ethnicity occurs for the sole purpose of creating a diverse student population. The programs that use affirmative action in public universities are being scrutinized to ensure that their methods are a means to an end and serve to create diversity only. This issue will come before the Supreme Court again in the future and there will most likely be a more permanent ruling on the matter.…
Dr. James Watson Office: 1507 Chemistry Bldg. Phone: (301) 405-1873 Email: watsonja@umd.edu Office hours: Mondays 1:00-1:50 and Thursdays 11-11:50 (or by appointment) Teaching Assistant: Poorni Adikaram poornird@umd.edu (Office hours by apt) BCHM463 meets MWF 11:00-11:50am in CHM1402. Textbook: Biochemistry (7th Ed.) by Stryer, Berg, and Tymoczko. There is an e-text available which is acceptable for use in this course. The 6th edition is acceptable for use although there may be some differences between the two editions. Class website: I will be using the ELMS/Blackboard site to maintain the course: http://elms.umd.edu throughout the semester. I have posted the Syllabus there. In addition, I will post exams from a previous semester. Course Description: BCHM 463 is a one-semester, 3-credit introduction to general biochemistry designed for undergraduate students. This course will emphasize fundamental biochemistry concepts including protein structure, enzyme catalysis, metabolism and metabolic regulation. Specific focuses in this class include but are not limited to: • • • • • Overview of cellular architecture and biomolecules Structure and function of proteins Structure and function of carbohydrates and lipids Fundamentals of enzyme function, kinetics, and regulation Metabolic pathways and their regulation: bioenergetics, glycolysis, citric acid cycle, glycogen and fatty acid metabolism, and oxidative phosphorylation…
BAP220.2 1 Music Styles II Did Video Kill The Radio Star? Student Name: Kirsty McWilliam Student Number: 107310 BAP220.2 “TELEVISION” 2 Through research and development this essay will show how the introduction of television impacted the creation, production and performance of music from the early 20th Century to the present. In 1979 British band The Buggles released Video Killed The Radio Star. The lyrics talk about a time of technological transformation in the 60’s, the longing to recollect…
The Edward v. State case leads to the development of a legal tussle to justify self representation as part of the accused’s constitutional rights. After undergoing evaluation by two psychiatrists, Ahmad Edwards got diagnosed with schizophrenia and as a result a declaration was taken…
Writing for a unanimous Court, Justice George Sutherland approved a line of lower court cases that held that "the words 'white person' were meant to indicate only a person of what is popularly known as the Caucasian race." Because in ordinary usage, the Japanese were not considered Caucasian, these courts had held, the Japanese were not "free white persons" within the meaning of the law. Justice Sutherland wrote that the lower courts' conclusion that the Japanese were not "free white persons" for purposes of naturalization had “become so well established by judicial and executive concurrence and legislative acquiescence that we should not at this late day feel at liberty to disturb it, in the absence of reasons far more cogent than any that…
The part that shocked many people was there was no physical evidence connecting either McCollum or Brown to the crime scene. Only thing was a witness said they had suspicion, and that was it. When the two brothers were taken into custody they were interrogated hard. Brown’s brother didn’t have a lawyer present, and the police just kept interrogating him. Finally he decided he wanted to go home, and told a story on killing the girl. The police told Brown that his brother admitted to the murder, and so after five hours of hard interrogating he finally just signed a statement also.…
The perpetrators were given the chance to legally advocate for pardon and have the chance to develop fine relations with the victims to basically reunite as a whole. This document refers directly to the job of the Gacaca Courts as an organization that advocates for the development of Rwanda a whole and wanted to make sure that the country succeeded without provoking more violence or the people taking the power in their hands to revenge what had been done to them. Precisely, to prevent a violent disaster such as the genocide, there was a law introduced a decade ago that procured perpetrators to ask for forgiveness. Readers of this document can infer that this law wanted to satisfy the Hutu perpetrators because by the time they asked for forgiveness.…
Each court period in U.S. history impacted the U.S. Supreme Court differently. When the new era of the Warren court was established in 1953, President Dwight D. Eisenhower had appointed Earl Warren as the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court thinking that Warren would introduce and spread conservative views throughout the U.S. Supreme Court when in fact he led the court into making liberal decisions. Warren surprised and tricked Eisenhower by his decisions in landmark court cases. The cases heard by the Warren Court focused on human rights and issues that were controversial at the time in the U.S..The Warren Court had a major impact on the U.S. Supreme Court, which caused changes in the focus and the future decisions of the Supreme Court.…
Article 21 confers right to live as a positive right but every law carries another aspect. Here right not to live is the other aspect of article 21 that has not been mentioned in this article. Article 19 of the Indian constitution…