Supreme Court to recognize the problems with the voting rights of the people, which caused a change in the focus and the future decisions in voting rights cases heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. In the case, Baker v Carr, the federal courts were granted the right to review reapportionment issues within a state, which influenced the supreme court to focus on more voting rights issues and established a precedent that affects future decisions made by the U.S. Supreme Court. Later on in U.S. history, in the case of Gray v Sanders, the Warren Court ruled that the election unit system of a county in a state can not violate the Equal Protection Clause and that the elections have to be regulated by the rule of “one per, one vote”. This decision impacted the U.S. Supreme Court by making the court focus on voting rights of the people and establishing a precedent that influences future decisions made by the court. Lastly, the Wesberry v Sanders was when the court decided that some votes can not exceed the power of other votes and that states had to draw the voting districts with equal populations, which provokes the court to focus on more voting rights cases and changes the result of future court cases judged by the U.S. Supreme Court. The Warren Court significantly impacted the U.S. Supreme Court by focusing on the and reestablishing the voting rights of …show more content…
Supreme Court. The Warren Court lead to the U.S. Supreme Court focusing on the protection of civil rights, voting rights, and the due process system in the U.S..The Warren Court was an important court in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court because the court ruled on controversial issues that not only impacted the Supreme Court but also impacted the general public. Many of the rights given to the public today would not have been clarified or reinforced if it was not for the Warren Court. The Warren Court was necessary for the development and growth of the United