Preview

The Great Compromise: The Judicial Branch Of Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
656 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Great Compromise: The Judicial Branch Of Government
The judicial branch of government interprets laws and administers justice. The judicial branch of government was established by Article lll of the Constitution along with other Federal courts created by Congress. This branch came about when statesmen who met in Philadelphia were followers of Montesquieu's concept that powers in politics should be balanced. John Locke's writings supported and made this principle stronger, this led to the judgment that there needed to be three equal branches of government, the executive, legislative, and the judicial branch.
A compromise that was made was the Great Compromise. The Great Compromise was an agreement that small and large states made. This compromise stated the representation and legislative structure each state should have under the U.S. Constitution. The outcome of the Great Compromise was that each state would have two representatives in the upper house. The judicial
…show more content…

John Marshall made a decision that expanded the powers of the Supreme Court and that is why he is important. John Marshall made it to where federal courts could use judicial review, for when/if someone violates the United States Constitution. John Marshall helped make the third branch of government, the judicial branch, what it is today. Some decisions that were made were in the Marbury Vs. Madison case, McCulloch Vs. Maryland case, Scott Vs. Sandford case, etc. These cases each greatly impacted our great nation and what it is today.
The Marbury Vs. Madison case is important because it was the first United States Supreme Court case to apply the judicial review principle. This case was between a man named William Marbury and James Madison, when James Madison refused to deliver Marbury's commission, Marbury made a petition, which would bring forth delivery of the commissions. Marbury’s petition was denied and proven not


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Marbury v. Madison (1803) the supreme court had announced for the first time the concept that a court has the right to declare an act of congress void if it is inconsistent with the constitution. In addition William Marbury was an intended recipient of an appointment as a justice of the peace in the area of Columbia. Then when James Madison, Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state, he refused to deliver Marbury’s commission. Marbury and 3 others joined and petitioned for a writ of mandamus compelling delivery of the…

    • 90 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison:(1803) Judicial review In 1801, Justice William Marbury was to have received a commission from President Adams, but Secretary of State James Madison refused to issue the commission. Chief Justice Marshall stated that the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was the basis for Marbury's claim, conflicted with Article III of the Constitution. Marbury did not receive the commission. This case determined that the Supreme Court and not the states would have the ultimate word on whether an issue was in violation of the Constitution. The ruling, based on judicial review, made the Judicial Branch equal to the other two branches of government.…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since its creation in the late 18th century, the Supreme Court has made numerous decisions that impacted the course of history. The Supreme Court has a very important job, to interpret the constitution principles and make decisions based on these important standards. Had it not been for the rulings made by this court, many laws and precedents may not have been adapted. One case that had an exceptionally important impact on history was the case of Muller vs. Oregon. This case is one of the most influential decisions in Supreme Court history and its impacts are still seen even today.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why was Marbury v. Madison such an important case? Was Justice Marshall acting in an interpretist or non-interpretist fashion? Marbury v. Madison was an important case because it was the first time that the U.S. Supreme Court applied judicial review to a case. Judicial review is where the federal courts have the power to void acts from Congress that differ from that of the Constitution.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v Madison was the influential case that the Supreme Court cites as a precedent when employing judicial review. It left the power to be rested on the judicial branch when determining to uphold either the law or the Constitution. By establishing the right to judicial review, Marshall, with the support of the legislative and executive branches, made all cases before the courts subservient to the U.S. Constitution.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This event brought about the case of Marbury vs. Madison. Marbury v. Madison was the first…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case of Marbury v. Madison (1803) has been described as "epochal", and for good reason. The case of Marbury v. Madison established the Supreme Court's power of judicial review. Judicial review is the ability of the Supreme Court to "review a law or an official act of government employee or agent for constitutionality or for the violation of basic principles of justice." This case directly shaped the future of the American public in a positive way: by making decisions that are lawfully correct and in the best interest of the public. This also had some short-term and long-term ramifications, including the decision that declared the legality of the Louisiana Purchase, the single act that doubled the size of the United States and laid the foundation for a future superpower.…

    • 762 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taking place in 1803, Marbury v. Madison was the landmark case that set the standard of judicial review into effect. This means that any previous ruling on a case can be used as a precedent and can determine the verdict. The background of this case is all sorts of messy; when John Adams’ term was near its end, William Marbury and a few others were appointed as “justices of peace” for the District of Columbia, however their positions were never official. When Thomas Jefferson came into office, he told James Madison, the Secretary of State at the time, to deny Marshall and the others’ commissions, so Marbury and the others then sued Madison. John Marshall ruled in favor of Marbury however could not deliver his commission because the constitution conflicted with a legislative act known as the Judiciary Act of 1789. This case was significant because it served as the basis for Article III of the Constitution that sets the standards…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. John Marshall means in his statement that the constitution does not allow the judiciary branch to rule in such a way that Marbury would like. Although Marbury did lose his job, the context in which he earned his job was unconstitutional. Marshall's statement is referring to the inability of the judiciary branch to compensate Marbury for a job which was given in an unconstitutional way.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Marbury vs Madison case would have to be one of the most important cases in Supreme Court history. The Marbury vs Madison cases was one of the first cases in U.S. history to ever to apply the principle of Judicial review the Judicial review had the power of federal courts to void acts of Congress in conflict with the Constitution , which was written by Chief Justice John Marshall. How it had all started was in 1803 in John Adams last few hours of office John Adams had appointed Marbury and many other judges in his last few hours of office. Republicans argued that these appointments were aimed at maintaining Federalist power. When Thomas Jefferson finally took office he ordered his secretary of states James Maddison to cease the work of…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Compromise of 1787 or the Connecticut Compromise of 1787 refers to the settlement of the dispute that rose due to conflicting views put forward by the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey plan. These plans proposed changes in the Articles of Confederation that was the aim of the Philadelphia Convention of 1787. However, whereas the Virginia Plan seemed to provide a greater representation of the more populous states in the national government, the New Jersey Plan was proposed by the smaller states aimed at preventing the balance of the US government from tilting in favor of the more populous states as per the Virginia Plan.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early national period, the judiciary was the weakest of the three branches of government. When Chief Justice John Marshall established the principle of judicial review in MarburyMadison by declaring an act of Congress unconstitutional, he greatly strengthened the judiciary. Even though the high court exercised this prerogative only one other time prior to the Civil War (Dred Scott v. Sanford), the establishment of judicial review made the judiciary more of an equal player with the executive and legislative branches.…

    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs Madison Case

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page

    The factors that lead up to the case of Marbury v. Madison are the president that was leaving the office, John Adams, had issued a commission as justice of the peace. What happened was that the new Secretary of State, James Madison, had refused to deliver it. Marbury then sued in order to obtain his commission. The decision that was made by the Supreme Court was that a law that was passed by Congress and signed by the president was declared unconstitutional. There was nothing written in the Constitution that specific power to do that. Chief Justice Marshall believed that the Supreme Court should have an equal role just like the other two branches of government. The future case that was impacted by this case was the Martin…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each of these three branches has different duties they must complete. The legislative branch includes a Congress, House of Representatives, and a Senate. The executive branch includes the President, and Executive and Cabinet departments. The judicial branch includes all of the courts, Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and the District Court. “Liberty requires that the three great departments should be separate and distinct.” (Document B) Separation of powers guards against tyranny because all three branches have equal but different power. The three branches are separate and distinct but they work together to form our government in a process called checks and…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison is one of the most important Supreme Court cases in the history of the United States. This case set many precedents in relation to the way the Supreme Court operates and its function within the three branches of government. In essence, this case established the norm of judicial review, or the practice of the Supreme Court being the deciding voice in whether a law is constitutional, and it caused the relationship between the three branches of government to become a closer one. The original conflict in this case came in the period between the presidencies of John Adams and Thomas Jefferson.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays