Preview

Absolutism And France's Monarchial System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
949 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Absolutism And France's Monarchial System
In the later portion of the 1600’s, the monarchial systems of both England and France were changing. England strayed away from an absolute monarch and ran toward a mightier parliament instead. The opposite was occurring in France as Louis XIV strengthened his own office while weakening the general assembly of France, the Estates General. Absolutism, the political situation in which a monarch controls makes all political, social, economic, and cultural decisions in a government without checks or balances, had been introduced by Charles I and James I. However, it never took hold. In France, Louis XIV took absolutism to extremes, claiming to be a servant of God. A limited monarch, England’s monarchial system, is a government in which a monarch …show more content…
Both Charles I and James I tried to rule without parliament’s consent, but parliament’s control at the time was so great that neither Charles nor James were able to successfully decrease its role in English government. In the Bill of Rights, it is declared by parliament that certain actions are illegal without consent of parliament. For example, “The king’s supposed power of suspending laws without the consent of parliament is illegal” (James Madison). The English were not ready to give all the power of government to a single person because they had been under the combined rule of both the king and the assembly for such an extended time. Parliament, where members could be elected and changed as necessary, as opposed to an absolute monarch with no restraints, was supported by land-owning nobles and merchants. In 1642, differences between parliament and Charles I sparked England's civil war, which was partially caused by the refusal of parliament to give up their power in government and partly by royal stubbornness to share control of the country. This was the chief turning point for absolutism in England. Beginning with Charles II, monarchs realized the amount of power Parliament had and knew that instead of working against one another, they had to work with each other. Since parliament was so centralized and so stalwartly entrenched into the …show more content…
They hoped to gain power by sanctioning the monarch. Bands of fighters, led by nobles, terrorized and plundered the lower classes around the country in an effort to deteriorate the king's authority. Eventually, they hired Spanish troops to carry on their fight, even though Spain and France were presently at war. Although the movement failed, it left an enduring imprint on the general public as to the worth of having a commanding monarch to safeguard them from things in analogous nature to the revolt. When the Cardinal died in 1661, Louis XIV, whom Cardinal Mazarin had been governing for a while, took supremacy. Louis XIV became the absolute, resilient ruler that France had been looking for to reestablish order in France. Louis XIV took hold of the country and put himself at the head of government. An excerpt from Politics Drawn from the Very Words of Holy Scripture states, “Without this absolute authority, the king could neither do good nor prevent evil. His power must be such that no one can hope to escape him”. It also states that, “Royal power is absolute”, and, “All the power of the individual subjects is united in the person of the king” (Bishop Jacques Bossuet). The Estates General was never called together, and most of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    King Charles the First made some bold moves against parliament, besides not listening to their guidance. Because of his stubbornness, so to speak, a civil war came about between the crown and parliament in 1642 . The Cavaliers defeated the Round head sand King Charles was executed for treason. Due to King Charles the First's stunts, England had to basically start from scratch and give all power to parliament. Which if you actually think about is a good…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can you believe that in the past the governments were very different compared to today’s government? The English government was very different compared to the French government, they both had their different ways. Besides the limited government of the English and the absolute government of the French they both have their weaknesses and strengths. I personally believe that the French form of absolutism was the more efficient form because of its strong stability, acceptable rights to the people, and able to make overall progress.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    parliament frq

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    James I's belief in "divine right" of kings, which meant God had chosen him to be ruler, led him not to rely on Parliament. Rather than depend on Parliament, James I and his successor, Charles I looked for other ways to acquire funds such as illegally levying taxes. Parliament was rarely called on during this period. In response to Charles illegal taxation, Parliament passed the Petition of Right which stated that, to pass any law the ruler must consent to Parliament. In order to continue ruling without Parliament, Charles used Ship Money to collect taxes as revenue. He might have been able to rule indefinitely without Parliament if not for his religious policies which provoked war with Scotland and forced Charles to call Parliament into session. This session, known as the Long Parliament was determined to limit the power of the king. It resolved that Parliament would meet at least every three years. Parliament later split with Charles I and declared war on him. Both James I and Charles I fought to suppress Parliament during their reigns and claimed absolute power due to the "divine right" of kings.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Louis XIV stressed the five major factors of absolutism were as follows: the King must be God-like, king must be in control, King must be the wealthiest, that conformity ( the idea of converting mass population from one religion to another) be implemented, and the King must have a strong military. These are the 5 rules of absolute monarchy. So it would seem that Louis XIV did believe in absolute monarchy as his reign was exactly that. He alone a was the ruler with absolute control over the entire country, and its economy. He had an advisor, but he mostly just made sure that the money was in order and everybody supported Louis. Being heavily Catholic, Louis forced Catholicism onto those who weren't. He expressed himself as the self-proclaimed…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the wake of the Reformation, two countries experienced a century of great change, and whether growth or decline, this change was drastic. After Elizabeth I died at the turn of the century, James I took the throne of England and took absolutism with him. He and the next five successors would oversee the growth of England from an erratic, absolutist monarchy to a working, stable Constitutional monarchy. France was not fortunate enough to experience such growth. In contrast, it experienced great decline because the country did not evolve and continued with absolutism even a century after England had proven that type of governing was not effective.…

    • 2213 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Britain originally was an absolute monarchy which increasingly found it had to exchange power with an advisory parliament in order to gain the resources to govern. Soon parliament, which developed into an aristocratic House of Lords and gentleman-filled House of Commons, clashed with the monarch in the Civil War 1639-1660. The decapitation of Charles I in 1649 symbolised the loss of decisive power to parliament, confirmed by the so-called Glorious Revolution of 1688 whereby the monarch agreed to be bound by the wishes of parliament.…

    • 3362 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism is a simple manner was the absolute power held by the monarch, and was exempt from being challenged. In other words, a monarch could, in theory, regulate various aspects of life without their authority being called into question. In France, absolutism is associated with the likes of Louis XIII, but rather more so with his descendent, King Louis XIV. However, while in theory absolutism granted the king a vast majority if the power and authority, it does not mean that it worked that way in practice. The king still had to answer to God.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to his age, Louis XIII’s aunt, Marie de Medici, becomes his regent, and Cardinal Richelieu becomes France’s chief advisor. With Richelieu as chief advisor, he continues the policy of Absolutism where the king has absolute power. He dominates the royal council by making hundreds of noblemen all live in one palace under the king’s rule. In addition, Richelieu destroys people’s castles and fortresses in order for the existence of only one army in france controlled by king. Lastly, Richelieu kills anyone who threatens King Louis XIII, or is suspected to be planning a rebellion against the king. Eventually, French Absolutism turns into a society in which the king controls the kingdom, and people are unable to take any initiative over their own…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An absolute monarch is a king or queen who has unlimited power who seeks to control all aspects of society. In the seventeenth century, people wanted to have a ruler that could be trusted and could lead the people well. To be an absolute ruler one must be able to control and obtain power. Louis XIV of France came into power as a young boy he was capable of ruling over a big population which helped him be an absolute ruler. Charles I of England came into power while the country was in financial ruins, in order to stable it he used his absolute rule, unfortunately it didn’t work out as well as he wanted it to. Peter the Great wanted to make the technology of Russia better so his plan was to westernize Russia.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In absolutist states, monarchs claimed to rule by divine right.5 Plato believed in rule by philosopher kings. King Louis XIV believed in the divine right of kings. But Louis XIV also believed in the responsibility of the king to live up to the divine appointment. Louis XIV was superior in the sense that the biological descendents created a clear cut designation of the ruler. Whereas Plato 's ambiguous mention of philosopher kings left a free for all civil strife as to who would the "philosopher" should be. The dictionary definition of the word absolutism is, 'A political theory holding that all power should be vested in one ruler or other authority '. Louis XIV believed strongly in this and believed himself to be an absolute ruler. He used various ways to make his mark, beginning with the idea of absolutism as this was an attractive option when his personal rule began in 1661.6 He inherited this concept from his father and believed that he would be a superior ruler by following on this tradition. During the seventeenth-century, Louis constructed a great palace at Versailles, twelve miles outside the city of Paris. It can be argued that Louis XIV had this palace designed to make the abstract political concept of absolutism visible and the idea that the king exercised absolute or unlimited authority over his lands and people.7 Louis ' reign can…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Around the 17th and 18th centuries, political power was a main objective to all rulers. Many monarchs weren’t successful with their attempts to have absolute power, but Louis XIV did, and it was the longest reign in European history. Louis XIV noticed that the qualities to becoming an absolute monarch were to not let servants have too much authority, lowering the power of the nobility, and controlling religions in his kingdom. The main obstacle he saw of getting absolute rule was controlling the power of the nobility(French), but he did accomplish this by slowing weakening the nobility until he had all the power. And is now known as one of the strongest monarchs to have ever lived in Europe.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV believed strongly in absolutism, which during his 73 year reign brought France to a pinnacle of cultural and military power. Absolutism brought the nation of France together as a country, even though it is still not essentially justified by…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism was at its peak in Europe during the 17th and 18th centuries. Louis XIV of France is frequently used as the model of an absolute monarch. Many other European monarchs during this period adopted the doctrine of the Divine Right of Kings, believing that God had invested in them all the power and authority in the state. Rulers who identify as Gods can not do others good. Even though absolutism can help benefit nations in dire situations, absolutism was simply an excuse for tyranny because of the overwhelming power given to an individual, and its failure of producing a large and thriving middle class.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism in Europe

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charles I considered himself to be an absolute monarch in England in the 1630¡¯s. A large portion of the parliament dislikes him because they wanted more of a say on the government and because the Protestant of the group disagreed with his Catholicism and ruling of the Anglican Church. The English Civil War crushed, + the parliament won, however, through Cromwell¡¯s Protectorate and the return of the Stuarts, Charles II and James II, it was not until 1688 that the Glorious Revolution placed William + Mary of Orange on the throne. They signed a Bill of Rights, which gave Parliament more power, and this gave the nobles a greater influence + responsibility in the government. It also stated that new tax could not be passed w/o parliamentary consent, another example of their increased power.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism In France

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In terms of the origins of national identity in France it is agreed that the French Revolution was the single most important period of radical social and political upheaval and was henceforth a catalyst for the spread of nationalism in France aswell as throughout the rest of Europe. Despite the fact the French Revolution occurred over 200 years ago, in present day France, there remain various symbols of the revolution which have become deeply embedded in the national identity of the country. One of which being the tricolore flag which was created to oppose the flag of the King, which itself was a symbol of the Ancient Regime.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays