Preview

Abuse Of Power In The Prince By Niccolo Machiavello

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
938 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Abuse Of Power In The Prince By Niccolo Machiavello
Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Prince. New York: Penguin, 1961.

The Prince, written by Niccolò Machiavelli, was, and is still considered today, one of the most influential and controversial publications of all time. Written during his political demise, Machiavelli dedicated The Prince to Lorenzo de’ Medici, in hopes that he would use his work as a practical guide for ruling Florence, Italy. Throughout his work, Machiavelli addresses a wide range of topics, which are intended to instruct and advise the prince on his use of power and political conduct. Considered the father of modern political thought, Niccolò Machiavelli was born on May 3, 1469, in Florence, Italy. In 1498, Machiavelli entered the service of the Florentine republic
…show more content…
The Prince itself is not a guide with instruction over creating the ideal ruling government; it is a guide on how to gain and hold power. By using examples set by great rulers of the past, Machiavelli explains how a ruler can acquire and perpetuate his power through their own prowess. However, Machiavelli urges the prince to gain this power at any means necessary, even if it entails immoral actions. “The fact is that a man who wants to act virtuously in every way necessarily comes to grief among so many who are not virtuous. Therefore if a prince wants to maintain his rule he must be prepared not to be virtuous” (50). Unlike the humanistic views of the period which exemplified virtue, Machiavelli does not hesitate to throw aside the concept of morality as an effective guide for political action. Instead, he defines “virtue” as the strength, courage, and ability that one exerts. From this stance, Machiavelli explains the necessity of cruelty and punishment when controlling a state and establishing power. He also describes how to use cruelty and execute citizens effectively, all at once and afterwards never again. He insists that this method will be beneficial for the prince since his subjects will eventually forget the crimes forced upon them. Machiavelli uses historical references, such as the rise and fall of Caesar, to support these objectives and argues …show more content…
In essence, The Prince was the first text of modern political thought that was not based on establishing a government, but with establishing power. When it was first published, it was also met with dissent by the Catholic church due to it’s secularization of politics. The ideas and lessons found throughout The Prince are not solely centered around religion or God, as many works were at the time. Machiavelli explains that religion is used as a uniting force, especially in ecclesiastical principalities, and not an important aspect when establishing political control. “But as they are sustained by higher powers which the human mind cannot comprehend, I shall not argue about them; they are exalted and maintained by god, and so only a rash and presumptuous man would take on himself to discuss them” (38). Instead of looking to religion for explanations, Machiavelli believes that a prince’s success or failure relies on both free will and fortune. Fortune is seen as the unpredictable, but through free will, a prince can foresee or overcome any obstacle that fortune may throw their way. Through this secular approach, Machiavelli believes that a man, especially a prince, is capable of choosing their own destiny and that free will is held more accountable than the presence of a divine

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Renaissance period was one of great achievement in the fields of architecture, painting, sculpture and literature. 'Machiavelli, a writer of literature emerged and came to favor in Florence during the rule of Savonarola in Italy.' In his work the Prince, a handbook for rulers, I will discuss its significance during this turbulent period in history. In doing this I will draw on some references from the Prince and explain their meaning and implications during the period of 1513 in Italy. This essay will then conclude with a summary and an evaluation of the historical significance of The Prince from an amoral and objective perspective during the Renaissance period.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli was an author and an aspiring political figure who had a strong influence on several aspects of Europe’s government. Due to his critical writings in The Prince, many historians see Machiavelli as a cruel and diabolical political figure whose true intentions were to gain power for himself. However, after looking further into Machiavelli’s political past, one can see that Machiavelli is in fact an intelligent man who possesses a hidden motive to write his novel. In his work, he covered several topics that were used by future city-state leaders to help them become successful. Machiavelli proves to be an astute political mind who used his political experience to assess the actions of famous princes and to write The Prince as a noteworthy…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Prince was written in the 1500’s by Niccolo Machiavelli, whom name became a synonym for crafty plotting. As noted, it is a political and social document, as relevant today as when it first appeared. Machiavelli’s work became thought of as a blueprint for dictators instead of a guide for efficient democratic government. The Prince does not give us all of Machiavelli’s political thinking; however, he devised this reading for the man who seeks power. It treated the most severe problem of Italy, its inferiority in political organization and military strength to nearby states like Spain and France and was addressed to princes like the Lorenzo “The Magnificent” Medici, to whom it was dedicated. As difficult as it was to read, I did not find…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People who wanted fame and power in this new world of humanism and self-righteousness had to deserve it. No longer did a supreme authority, such as the pope, appoint officials and leaders. The authority rested in the hands of the person willing to take charge. This approach to gaining wealth and power can be described as Machivellian, named so by the influence of ideologist Niccolo Machiavelli. Machiavelli wrote one of the most influential political books of all time, called the Prince, which is considered the most lasting work on Italian Renaissance. In his novel, Machiavelli writes of " cruelty, well used or badly used," and warns the compassionate and humanistic prince "not to make bad use of this compassion".(Burke p.196) Machiavelli expanded on his belief in the Prince, that Italians should behave with ferocity when it comes to politics, and should back up that ferocity with a unified force. Machiavelli's principles have had a profound effect on the way Europe and the rest of the world have viewed politics over centuries, and truly show the Rennaissance's uncanny trait of promoting individualism and social Darwinism.<br><br>The Italian Renaissance has made a major impact on the rest of Europe, leaving an intellectual and artistic heritage that…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Prince was written for Lorenzo de Medici of the Medici Family, which was the best known family in the Renaissance Era. Medici Family made great contributions to the culture because it traded and paid for many works of art in that period. The Medici Family was rich and powerful in Italy, and it was the Renaissance equivalent of a major corporation. Machiavelli lived hundreds of years before the major corporation of today, but The Prince can still be used as a guide to getting ahead in business, just as it is a guide for building a successful princedom. The Medici Family had existed for hundreds of years, and it was powerful and rich just like the Coca-Cola Company. The Coca-Cola Company may also last for hundreds of years since it has been successful for over a hundred years.…

    • 1760 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Prince was written by Niccolò Machiavelli while he was in exile. In his efforts to return to politics, Machiavelli wrote the Prince in order to exert the true nature of a successful leader, and once again be in the good graces of the Medici’s who were rising to power in Italy. The Prince reveals what Machiavelli views to be a successful leader. The Prince also reveals how Machiavelli views the nature of humans and how that effects how a dictator/leader should rule. Machiavelli believes human beings are selfish, greedy, easily manipulated, and incapable of self-governing as it often ends in their own demise. “[F]or men change their rulers willingly, hoping to better themselves, and this hope induces them to take up arms against him who rules: wherein they are deceived, because they afterwards find by experience they have gone from bad to worse” (Machiavelli 201). Human selfishness inhibits the individual’s ability to make rational long-term decisions thus deeming them incapable of self-governing. If given the people the right to make their own decisions, their greed ill cloud their judgment and cause them to make decisions that may not be in their best interest. If the society is not capable of self-governing they will need a strong leader and Machiavelli has the recipe for the perfect…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli had many intentions in mind when he was first writing The Prince, among which where to understand, instruct and influence the minds of rulers at the time. More precisely, Machiavelli meant to influence the mind of one ruler in particular, the ruler of Florence Lorenzo de’ Medici to whom the book is dedicated. Machiavelli’s purpose throughout the book intended to help Lorenzo de’ Medici achieve eminence as a prince and guide him on how to properly rule Florence.…

    • 2153 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1.) Machiavelli wrote The Prince to win the favor and trust of Lorenzo de' Medici.…

    • 344 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Prince

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Machiavelli wrote The Prince because he wanted Lorenzo de’ Medici, who was the current ruler, to be impressed by him and show him that he was intelligent and a useful advisor to him. Machiavelli also wrote it for Princes to read and comprehend how to be successful in power.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In addition, one of the main points that Machiavelli pushes through out his book is the use of force and fear. It is noted that force is a great way for a Prince to become "strong, secure, and respected"; and he links this force with the devastation that he talks about in seizing and securing a state. Another strong point to give in this argument against Machiavelli wanting a just ruler is the fact that he writes about a Prince seizing a state with "evil means"; he writes that "cruelty can be used well" and gives examples of rulers who had done so previously, and also that if a ruler uses evil means in his acquisition of a state they must decide how much injury or evil they wish to inflict. Machiavelli feels as though in seizing a state cruel acts are a must at first to get the people under control, but eventually he feels the people will forget, and forgive and understand why the acts committed were done. The last point to note is that Machiavelli says that a Prince does not need to be moral or ethical but virtuous and wise; a virtuous and wise prince will be able to keep the population in control, keep the military controlled, and by being virtuous and wise he able to do good for…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli’s The Prince is teaching the politically ambitious rulers how to use violence in order to secure the power as a personal end. Machiavelli advises a ruler to use violence as part of politics in order to maintain the rule but most importantly he should use violence to aim at political stability and the overall benefit of the community. In this regard, Machiavelli opposes the illicit use of political violence because he believes that ultimately that will be destructive to the user. Machiavelli’s view on political violence does seem to be strict however it distinguishes the practical and moral use of violence. The two historical figure whom Machiavelli uses models in order to explain his theories are Cesare Borgia and Agathocles. These…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prince is said to be a classic of the early Renaissance period that addresses politics of Machiavelli's time. Even though Machiavelli's approach is controversial, but it also very plausible when applied to modern politics or situation. Machiavelli meant for this to be a guidebook for future leaders based off of past leaderships. For example, the section about Cesare Borgia addresses how resilience is a good quality for a leader to keep power. Borgia was not able to keep power because he relied heavily on his father, Pope Alexander VI. Other than that, this story focuses a lot on the idea of morals and ethics. People based all of their decisions on morals and ethics. A reason that may or may not be accurate is that classical literature would sometimes influence public figures. In that case, something like the Prince is ideal for leaders who want to know how to keep power and be feared while in the best interest of his…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli believes that the common people are only interested in their own well-being, and that they will only support their prince if he supports and benefits their happiness and rules the state well. This view can be applied to the prince as well because the book serves to the prince’s best interests. The prince will gain the respect of his citizens if he can be feared and loved, but Machiavelli believes that it would be better for the prince to be feared than loved. “…for love is held by a chain of obligation, which, because men are wicked, is broken at every opportunity for their own utility, but fear is held by a dread of punishment that…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays