Preview

Acc260 the Enron and Worldcom Scandals

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
537 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Acc260 the Enron and Worldcom Scandals
Wk2 Assignment: The Enron and WorldCom Scandals

Student Name

ACC/260

Date

Instructors Name[Page Break]

1. Which segment of its operations got Enron into difficulties?

The guaranteed loans that were intended to bridge the financing for investments from outside investors that could not be found would be the segment of operations that caused Enron difficulties.

2. Did Enron’s directors understand how profits were being made in this segment? Why or why not?

Enron’s directors did not understand how profits were being made in this segment because they were kept out of the loop of everything until all the issues became public.

3. Ken Lay was the chair of the board and the CEO for much of the time. How did this probably contribute to the lack of proper governance?

Key Lay allowed many things to happen that were not ethical. He was in charge of all of Enron’s activities. Because Ken Lay allowed deals to go on that were unethical and did not think about the consequences, it caused a sever lack of governance.

4. What aspects of the Enron governance system failed to work properly, and why?

Enron’s board members only allowed a slight amount of informations on the company’s earnings to be seen by the public and the investors of the company. Because the board members did not question management when needed it failed to protect the interests of the shareholders of the company.

5. Identify conflicts of interests in:

• SPE activities

Enron was not reporting their losses off the end of the year reports, so to offset their other dealings that were not profitable.

• Arthur Andersen’s activities

Arthur Andersen’s did not report all of the earnings and helped Enron cover up losses that caused a conflict of interest.

• Executive activities

While the company’s employees were



References: Brooks, L. J. (2007). Business & professional ethics for directors, executives, & accountants (4th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson Southwestern.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Enron Case Study

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. What activities and practices of Enron’s management team do you believe were unethical and/ or illegal?…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enron Case Analysis

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Some investors that are misled lost chunk if not all of their investments. The public, investors, employees, pension holders and politicians were so outraged and wanted to why Enron's failings were not spotted earlier. Enron did not do these all alone, they have accomplice in the name of another giant accounting/auditing company called Arthur Andersen where they helped the firm overlooked significant debts that are not the Enron’s financial statement. They knew that Enron was over its head but they let the company conceal its debt over a long period of that which eventually led to the downfall of the company. The highlight of this section is that Enron’s top managements self interest, greed led to presenting the investors and board of directors misleading financial statements. Because of their greed and self interest, a crime was committed that led to prosecution of some of the Enron’s top managers. For example, Former Enron executive Michael Kopper pleads guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering conspiracy. While Andrew Fastow Former CFO was charged with securities fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, money laundering and conspiracy. To avoid another Enron, the US Congress passed a law called Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enron Case Study

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What happened to Enron was just its founder at the time Ken Lay was greedy and unethical right from the beginning, and that was how he steered the boat to that direction. Instead of firing traders who were pocketing profits for themselves, manipulating reports which showed steady financial trends, he managed to keep them, because they were making a lot of money for the company. So he was giving opportunities for this staffs to do underhand works and he only cared if it made profits for the company. Later, when Jeff Skilling joined Enron, he developed what Lay had…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Paper

    • 9026 Words
    • 37 Pages

    Some argue Enron’s record-breaking bankruptcy and eventual demise was the result of a lack of ethical corporate behavior attributed, more generally, to capitalism’s inability to check the unmitigated growth of corporate greed. Others believe Enron’s collapse can be traced back to questionable accounting practices such as mark-to-market accounting and the utilization of Special Purpose Entities (SPE’s) to hide financial debt. In other instances, people point toward Enron’s mismanagement of risk and overextension of capital resources, coupled with the stark philosophical differences in management that existed between company leaders, as the primary reasons why the company went bankrupt. Yet, despite these various analyses of why things went wrong, the story of Enron’s rise and fall continues to mystify the general public as well as generate continued interest in what actually happened.…

    • 9026 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Enron Case 1.1

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Since the Enron scandal the auditing standards have changed significantly. Therefore we have analyzed this question with today’s new auditing standards. Anderson violated many professional auditing standards with their involvement in Enron’s…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Enron: Tone at the Top

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Enron, one of the largest corporations in America and once ranked Fortune magazine’s “Most Admired Companies” went down in 2001 after they were exposed of defrauding their investors in a series of creative ways. Enron was known for being an innovative company in the energy, technology space but much of their innovation seemed to lie in how they managed to hide their debts and cover their losses through unscrupulous means. They would book hypothetical profits on projects and joint ventures that had not yet launched and on the day a deal was signed. They would hide their debts through the use of complex Special Purpose Entities (SPEs). They would solicit support from top tier investment banks by giving them lucrative deals to work on. All this and more was conducted with one clear objective in mind: to make as much money as possible through manipulation. Everyone was happy as long as there was money to be made. Ethics was out the window. Manipulating financial books and records, exploiting deregulated markets became their predominant strategy -all in the name of maximizing profits and pushing up the company’s stock price. When indicted, the chief executives of Enron, Kenneth Lay (former Chairman and CEO) and Jeffrey Skilling (CEO), amongst others, continually denied their involvement.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is not unusual for businesses to fail after making bad or ill-timed investments. What turned the Enron case into a major financial scandal was the company’s response to its problems. Rather than disclose its true condition to public investors, as the law requires, Enron falsified its accounts. It assigned business losses and near-worthless assets to unconsolidated partnerships and “special purpose…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bigger Than Enron

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Enron did a number of things that had a part in the reform of the Sarbanes -Oxley bill. Enron would hide or modify information in order to make it look as though there profits were growing year after year. One way they did this was create an entire company that didn't actually exist and start dumping there debts onto this other company making themselves look far more profitable. Because of actions such as this, the Sarbanes-Oxley section 401 which states "Financial statements are published by issuers are required to be accurate and presented in a manner that does not contain incorrect statements or admit to state material information. These financial statements shall also include all material off-balance sheet liabilities, obligations or transactions."(.soxlaw)…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Enron was under the control of what was thought to have Upper Managers that were to have ethical and moral believes that followed the Corporate rules and regulations. These manager lacked to have the need to successful accounting transparency, which enabled the company’s managers to make their financials look much better than they actually were. Specific people made out with billions of dollars due to their unethical behavior. Money is power and can do major damage if the rules and belief systems are not upheld. Due to the unethical and morality decision employees lost their jobs as well as their pension funds. This also damaged the lives that were involved with Enron’s products as well.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As mentioned in the case, Arthur Andersen was being paid exorbitant amounts of money to audit Enron and attest to the validity of its financial statements. The firm failed on every front to catch any of the fraudulent…

    • 2007 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enron, at the time, was a legitimate energy company that delivered tangible goods. The two bosses of the company, Enron, were Jeff Skilling and Ken Lay. They also had companions that contributed to this disgraceful activity as well. Jeff and Ken were caught constantly lying about everything. They corrupted all of the six factors of an ethical leader and the six pillars of characters, but in this particular incident, they corrupted honesty and trustworthiness. The company and its owners strived firmly on no interference from the government. To most people, this is better known as “Laissez faire”, which is, “The practice or doctrine of noninterference in the affairs of others” (dictionary.com). Due to the fact that there was no government interference, it made Jeff and Ken very believable, thus the reason why they were so convincing until the stock market collapsed. After it collapsed, both Jeff and Ken tried to put the blame on Andy Fastow, who was the CFO that Jeff had hired. Fastow was guided by others involved on the deal and had no idea what was going on. The bosses, Jeff and Ken, were not honest with him about the company before they hired him; later on, this also made them not trustworthy. Fastow was the only one that did not know what was going on so it made sense for the Jeff and Ken to put the blame on him because Fastow was responsible for the paperwork. In…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arthur Anderson

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Arthur Anderson’s audit partners’ sole concern was how much revenue could be generated, so the employees of Arthur Anderson paid little mind to the quality of the audits they did as long as they were making money. They turned their heads when generally accepted accounting principles were not being followed and hid the fact that Enron’s policies and internal controls were not good enough to protect its shareholders.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Enron Collapse

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    At one time Enron was one of the world’s largest producers of natural gas, oil, and electricity. It also appeared to be one of the most profitable companies, taking shareholders from $19.10 in 1999 to $90.80 by the end of 2000. Enron’s top management answered to a Board of Directors whose responsibility was to question and challenge new partnerships, ventures, and decisions within the company. On several occasions, Andrew Fastow, the company’s Chief Financial Officer approached the board of directors with new investment partnerships which the board approved with very little questioning. Some of these partnerships created a conflict of interest due to the fact that Fastow was not only managing the partnerships, but he was also an investor in an outside entity that took part in buying and sellingassets with Enron. Fastow was able to create and manage several of these partnerships while still maintaining his role as CFO of Enron. This was due to the rule set in place by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) which states, “if an outside investor puts in 3 percent or more of the capital in a partnership, the corporation, even if it provides the other 97 percent, does not have to declare the partnership as a subsidiary. Therefore, assets and debt in the partnership can be withheld from the corporation’s balance sheet.” With this rule and the many partnerships Fastow created, Enron did not have to declare the assets and debts from these partnerships, therefore hiding hundreds of millions of dollars in losses and debt. The board of directors however did not consider Fastow’s interaction with the partnerships to be a serious problem due to the fact that the financial gain potential to Enron was great. In fact Enron had a 65 page code of ethics that was given to all employees.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The practices by Enron’s management breached the fiduciary, property, transparency, dignity and fairness principle, this unethical behaviour is why they developed conflict of interest between high up board members, this was using their company’s profits as their own bank for their own benefits.…

    • 2736 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. There should have been measures in place to oversee the activities of accounting firms (Arthur Andersen), as they acted as both Enron’s “Consultant” and “Accountant”. These two must be separate organizations as seen as a conflict of interest.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays