Preview

Acceptance Of Civil Disobedience

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
804 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Acceptance Of Civil Disobedience
The acceptance of civil disobedience is something everyone should be proud of. Throughout time there have been many who have spoken out and never got very far. There seems to be a sort of shame and a lot of discouragement from others. When there is no more shame there will be a stronger and better understanding of why it is understandable to be disobedient. By not giving in to those who do not accept it, understanding why change is needed, and grasping the effectiveness that will be created from civil disobedience it can become a popular and helpful way to get what everyone should rightfully have.
Those who do not agree with civil disobedience would say that it is not legal, they would talk about how far this country has come with everything that has already been done in the past, and also they would talk about how it is disrespect. The civil follower would stress that it is not legal to be
…show more content…
Those who oppose civil disobedience would say that it goes against laws, they would talk about how advanced the country has come without disagreement, and also they would talk about how it is disrespectful towards the country and those who make the laws. It doesn’t go against the law, it is freedom of speech. Disagreement will only improve the country to make everyone happier. It is not disrespectful because the laws made are more disrespectful towards the people who have to follow them. There will always be those who disagree, there has to be growth to benefit the country, and there must be an understanding of how effective civil disobedience is. What would be better for this country would be for everyone to have a general understanding of why civil disobedience is used and that more need to use it in order to get what is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Now for arguments presented against civil disobedience: of seven, Cohen concludes that none ""succeeds in showing that civil disobedience can never be justified."" Finally, the penetrating conclusion that ""Civil disobedience as a means is extraordinary, but, after all, so are the problems society sometimes confronts.""…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1891 the author Oscar Wilde claimed, disobedience is a valuable human trait and promotes social progress. 125 years later, and Wilde’s statement still holds true. Experts have defined social progress as, increasing the ability of a society to meet the basic human needs of its citizens. Looking to the past to different historical examples, the idea that disobedience promotes social progress becomes self-evident. It is shown that in most situations if someone wishes to change his/her current situation for the betterment of him/herself and or his/her community, disobedience in some way, shape, or form must be used.…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate was thrust into a hotbed of discussion during the peak of the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. In 1964, Morris I. Leibman was an avid anti-civil disobedience activist. He argued that there is no reason for any citizen to find an excuse to break the law because when people agree to enter society, they accept the rules that society establishes. Once you break these laws, there is no purpose to society existing in the first place. He argues that if you give leeway to certain circumstances in the law, where do you draw the line? In his mind, civil disobedience is deplorable and believes it’s the wrong way to create change. Continuing with this train of thought, Herbert Storing argued that civil disobedience would likely die out because of its irrelevance to today’s problems. He found it’s attempt to combine revolution and conventional political action into one as a blend of ideas ineffective in its approach for change. Both of these men wrote their responses to civil disobedience at the height of the Civil Rights Movement in the U.S. and both agreed that black people deserved equal opportunity under the law, but they felt that civil disobedience was a regressive tactic…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is a key part of the rights that all Americans now have. Civil disobedience allows for the people to take a stand against rules and regulations that they do not agree with. From movements such as ending slavery, women voting, and racial equality, civil disobedience was a major factor in getting the attention of those who had the position to make a change. Rosa Parks wouldn't give up her seat on a bus, which brought national attention to rising concerns of racial equality in the 1950s and 1960s. Martin Luther King Junior held many rallies and marches to make his point well known, and impossible to ignore by the people who had the power to change the laws of the day. From as far back as Harriet Tubman, who helped slaves…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance to rules and regulations among society goes down historically as something so inevitably iconic as an occurrence known as civil disobedience. It is no doubt that civil disobedience, the act of opposing a law deemed unjust and peacefully disobeying it henceforth, spurs such great controversy in our society. Civil disobedience impacts society in a positive manner that does not hinder nor deteriorate the good name of the just nation that is home, but moreover poses as an influence for what is better accepted by humans as lawful.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    tells, "No one will ever convict me for a traitor" (Page 61). In a nonviolent…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additionally, many people fail to recognize that their struggles were made worth it by peaceful misbehavior and breaking of the law. Similarly like Martin L. King Jr. and Rosa Parks, there are innumerable people who have done the same for diverse rights of the people. Disobedience has been part of our history, but no one realizes that both individuals bent laws for those they loved. Everybody has to defy the rules at some point in their life and us ourselves do not know if our acts of protest will be part of a legacy just like theirs. “Disobedience”, should not have a pessimistic connotation, but instead be appreciated as a virtuous strength and progress to change a city, a state, a country, a continent, and even the…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some argue that civil disobedience represents a genuine cause, but reject the methods of direct action simply as disruptive, immoral, and an illegal standard to combat inequality. Civil disobedience is stigmatized to be corrupt and ineffective; however, I believe these labels do no justice to the cause the act of civil disobedience embodies. Unfortunately, the reality becomes a simple and cruel true: Justice prolonged is justice denied. Not everyone is granted the luxury of timely inalienable rights. Had it not been for those who protested and engaged in the Boston Tea Party how long would have the conversation or much less the American Revolution been delayed? Had it not been for Rosa Parks and the countless others who engaged in civil disobedience how long would it have been before society was desegregated at the choice of the oppressor? When one engages in peaceful civil disobedience, one is given the platform to address the…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I negate that civil disobedience, or “the refusal to obey certain laws, demands, or commands of a government, or of an occupying international power”, according to the dictionary, should be permissible. The rule of law provides the necessary structure for maintaining justice. Civil Disobedience is not permissible for three reasons: It sabotages democratic process, is self-defeating, and although a part of history, that does not make it morally just. Civil Disobedience is not permissible because it sabotages democratic process. Deliberately breaking the law violates the procedural rules that an operating democracy determines.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is a vital and necessary part of life in a democratic system of government. It serves to keep the government from overstepping its bounds. There are times in the history of countries where the governing body has become complacent and has begun to violate the rights of their citizens. Civil disobedience is an effective way of discouraging and preventing such transgressions. Without the threat of dissidence from the public, there is nothing to keep governments honest except for the honor of those governments, which is highly questionable even in the noblest of nations. The role of elected officials in the United States is to represent their constituents, be they from their district, state, or party. If there is nothing to hold these politicians to this purpose, can we truly be sure they are ruling in a representative way and not in self interest?…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is the refusal to comply with certain laws or to pay taxes and fines, as a peaceful form of political protest.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Civil Disobedience

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Movements around the globe have stemmed from peaceful beginnings, and in the United States alone, many prominent peaceful movements have brought about some of the most prominent reforms put forth by the government. Being that no real results can be expected from mere picketing and passive proclamations from a megaphone, these demonstrations often break the law in some way, explaining where the label of disobedience comes from. Civil disobedience is an increasing practice worldwide, and it is proven to be exceptionally effective when put to the test against oppressive regimes, unjust laws, and stoic governments. It has been practiced by some of the most influential leaders of the civil rights movement in the United States such…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    History will reveal the major part civil disobedience has played on overcoming governmental injustices. Today, people know Gandhi’s Salt March to Martin Luther King’s demonstrations. Gandhi’s actions helped gain India’s its independence and King’s tactics were instrumental in winning rights for black people in the United States. Others situations include the successful protest of 1998 rioters in Indonesia against the despotic system of government under the Suharto regime.[3] In the US during the early 1900s strikes organized by mistreated workers led to the introduction of labor unions, end of child labor and improved job benefits.[4] Those in the opposite mindset believe that civil disobedience is counter-productive and that the court system should combat unjust laws. However what all these causes listed above has in common was that, “there was no other avenue open to redress grievances” making civil obedience the only way to protest…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr goes in great detail in explaining his view on civil disobedience in his letter from Birmingham jail. In his letter he makes his case for being able to bypass the law. He states that “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere”. With that said, he honestly believes that if any given law is unjust, then you in turn are allowed to break in order to make your point clear. However, when doing so, one must not act violently. You must break them in a peaceful manner (marches, rallies, etc). King also states that you must accept your punishment for breaking such laws. If a large amount of people make sacrifices (by going to jail), eventually it will make headlines and let people all over the nation know how corrupt and unjust their laws truly are. He wasn’t just an exceptional public speaker, but also a man of his word. He was one of the many people that took the risk and accepted his punishment. By going to jail he proved that he in fact wasn’t above the law, on the contrary, he used the corrupt law as a tool to create…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is civil disobedience? It can be defined as the active nonviolent refusal to obey a law that is deemed to be unjust (Boss, 2012). DeChristopher, a climate-change activist, was convicted of bidding on oil and gas leases in a 2008 federal auction. A jury found that he defrauded the federal government, running up a $1.8 million tab he could not pay (The Salt Lake Tribune, 2011). As a result of DeChristopher’s civil disobedience, the oil and gas leases he bid on were later deemed inappropriate for drilling and withdrawn from future auctions.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays