Joseph A. Werner
John Daughters
PHI221
Stevens-Henager College
5 May 2013
Civil Disobedience, a Stand on Moral Ground
This country has a rich history of civil disobedience. In fact, the men who founded our country used civil disobedience to protest against unjust laws that they felt threatened their future and the future of generations to come. Tim DeChristopher used civil disobedience to stop the auction of oil and gas leases being held by the BLM. Mohandas Gandhi used nonviolent resistance against the British who occupied India. While Henry David Thoreau not only used these methods of nonviolent protest, he actually helped to define criteria of what is to be considered civil disobedience. What is civil disobedience? It can be defined as the active nonviolent refusal to obey a law that is deemed to be unjust (Boss, 2012). DeChristopher, a climate-change activist, was convicted of bidding on oil and gas leases in a 2008 federal auction. A jury found that he defrauded the federal government, running up a $1.8 million tab he could not pay (The Salt Lake Tribune, 2011). As a result of DeChristopher’s civil disobedience, the oil and gas leases he bid on were later deemed inappropriate for drilling and withdrawn from future auctions. Mohandas Gandhi launched a policy of nonviolent noncooperation against the British following the Massacre at Amritsar in 1919 (Boss, 2012). He used his moral outrage guided by reason to effect change in the cultural norms of India and ultimately helped India gain independence in 1947. Gandhi’s efforts have greatly impacted social and political reform, and have influenced later civil rights movements. Henry David Thoreau was arrested for his refusal to pay a state tax in support of the Mexican-American War. He was opposed to the war because it was intended to expand the slave states. Thoreau not only engaged in civil disobedience, but in his essay “Civil Disobedience” he has outlined criteria for an action to be considered civil disobedience. First is to use only moral and nonviolent means to achieve our goals. Second, we must first make efforts to bring about change through legal means. Third is to be open and public about our actions. Fourth we must be willing to accept the consequences of our actions. These three instances of civil disobedience have some similarities. In all three cases someone has seen a moral injustice, and has used moral outrage guided by reason to effect change. The issues may have been different, however, by standing their moral ground these people who could be considered heroes, have had a lasting influence on political and social reform in the world. They have followed Thoreau’s criteria for civil disobedience and more often than not been arrested for their protest. When faced with an opportunity to effect change by means of civil disobedience, one must think critically and make rational decisions on whether or not the consequences to one’s actions will be worth it in the end. Since civil disobedience involves breaking the law, many times the consequences are jail time, fines, loss of jobs, social disapproval, and even deportation.
Rather than resorting to fallacies and rhetorical devices, we need to be prepared to use well-reasoned arguments and assertive communication to back our positions (Boss, 2012). Sometimes being a good citizen and fulfilling our moral obligation to be a good citizen isn’t the easy thing to do. This might affect the ability to be a good employee/employer. If your employer engages in activities you consider to me immoral and you protest against these activities by using civil disobedience, the consequences will more than likely result in the loss of your job. As an employer, there would probably be little tolerance for employees who are involved with immoral activities. Such activities may promote a negative image for the company. As part of Thoreau’s criteria we must all be willing to accept the consequences of our civil disobedience.
Although the First Amendment allows the freedom of speech, it does not protect one from being fired from a job for invoking this right to free speech. I believe if someone feels their employer is engaged in immoral activity, their moral obligation to be a good citizen should lead them to protest these activities. However, I do not believe their job should be protected by the First Amendment. If the protest does not defame the company or create as negative image that may affect the profitability of the company, there would be no reason for the employee to be fired for their protest. This would involve critical thinking and rational decision making as to how to protest immoral action without losing your job. As per Thoreau’s criteria if you choose to protest and use civil disobedience, you must be prepared to accept the consequences.
This country was founded on the principals of civil disobedience and standing ones moral ground. We can all effect change if we use the principals of civil disobedience properly. These three examples of how civil disobedience can bring about needed social and political reform. With the self-sacrifice of a few, we can greatly impact the welfare of the many.
References
Boss, J. A. (2012). Think: Critical Thinking and Logic Skills for Everyday Life (2nd ed.). New York, NY, United States: McGraw-Hill.
The Salt Lake Tribune. (2011, July 27). JusticeDenied. Retrieved May 5, 2013, from www.sltrib.com: http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/opinion/52265321-82/dechristopher-federal-prison-drilling.html.csp
References: Boss, J. A. (2012). Think: Critical Thinking and Logic Skills for Everyday Life (2nd ed.). New York, NY, United States: McGraw-Hill. The Salt Lake Tribune. (2011, July 27). JusticeDenied. Retrieved May 5, 2013, from www.sltrib.com: http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/opinion/52265321-82/dechristopher-federal-prison-drilling.html.csp
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Thoreau, a Harvard philosopher, wrote in 1849 an essay explaining himself, who spent a night in jail to protest taxes that funded the Mexican-American War. Likewise, Tim Dechristopher, an environmental activist in 2008, disrupted the bid for oil drilling leases, to hinder and protest the destruction of the environment. Thoreau explains his antithesis, “If [U.S. Citizens] pay the tax from a mistaken interest in the individual taxes, to save his property, or prevent his going to jail, it is because they have not considered wisely how far they let their private feelings interfere with the public good” (Thoreau 3, 10). Hence, he states that doing unjust and illegal activities is justifiable, if it boosts public welfare. Similarly, Dechristopher’s illegal act of fraud is justified in the New York Times article, “Activist said the sale would threaten Utah’s wild lands and spoil the view from some of the state’s spectacular national parks with drilling rigs” (Associated Press 11). As many environmental activists agree, the public welfare of the people relies on the health of the environment. Seeing Dechristopher verbally support his own act of civil disobedience, and in like manner, Thoreau justifying his act and accepting it, it is deducted that they are both embodiments of civil disobedience. If civil disobedience was construed, Thoreau and…
- 530 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Civil disobedience is where you actively refusal to obey certain laws, demands or commands of a government…
- 343 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Civil Disobedience is the refusal to comply with certain laws or to pay taxes and fines, as a peaceful form of political protest. The action of Civil Disobedience is usually, not always though, classified as being not violent resistance. Also, it may be compared as compassion of respectable disagreement.…
- 462 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Now for arguments presented against civil disobedience: of seven, Cohen concludes that none ""succeeds in showing that civil disobedience can never be justified."" Finally, the penetrating conclusion that ""Civil disobedience as a means is extraordinary, but, after all, so are the problems society sometimes confronts.""…
- 523 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Civil disobedience is using nonviolent protest to boycott government in an attempt to influence the legislation to change the policy. Henry David Thoreau created a writing called "Civil Disobedience", talking about its meaning and how he had experienced civil disobedience. He had been sent to jail for not paying a poll-tax for six years (Thoreau par. 7). When he was released, he paid the tax; obeying the law, but had still thought that government is biased for making him pay it (McElroy par. 2). Wendy McElroy stated "He listened to the inner voice of his conscience, a voice all men possess but few men follow (McElroy par. 5). Thoreau listened to his belief and did not pay the tax because he did not believe it was something that he should have to do. Overall, Thoreau was a simple man who relied on nonviolent nature and his own beliefs to disobey the government and its laws. Thoreau would have recognized the Singing Revolution in Europe and the Kent State University protestors as significant acts of civil disobedience considering…
- 1039 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
According to the infamous essay by Henry David Thoreau, civil disobedience is the conscious and intentional disobeying of a law to advance a moral principle or change government policy. Throughout the essay, Thoreau urges the need for individuals to put their personal and social consciousness before their allegiance to their government and its range of policies. Thoreau believed that if a government is unjust, citizens should simply refuse to follow the law and eventually begin to distance themselves from their government in a variety of ways. Although published 105 years one of the most turbulent and crucial times in American history, the leaders…
- 1643 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
I negate that civil disobedience, or “the refusal to obey certain laws, demands, or commands of a government, or of an occupying international power”, according to the dictionary, should be permissible. The rule of law provides the necessary structure for maintaining justice. Civil Disobedience is not permissible for three reasons: It sabotages democratic process, is self-defeating, and although a part of history, that does not make it morally just. Civil Disobedience is not permissible because it sabotages democratic process. Deliberately breaking the law violates the procedural rules that an operating democracy determines.…
- 521 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
References: Boss, J. (2012). Critical Thinking And Logic Skills For Everyday Life. New York: McGraw-Hill.…
- 358 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The effects and repercussions of civil disobedience reverberate throughout society, not just in American culture, but in cultures worldwide. Look at history and it’s easy to see. The Revolutionary War could be said to an act of civil disobedience, though in the beginning the colonists didn’t actually want to be separate until the Olive Branch Petition was rejected. That petition was asking the King to see their point of view, and expressed their hopes of reconciliation (…
- 237 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Civil disobedience: conscientious and public opposition of law or government demands to influence legislation of government policy. Coined by the renowned Henry David Thoreau and built upon the freedoms of speech, press, and assembly, civil disobedience is used worldwide by citizens to voice themselves to the government. Breaches of law have not only been prominent in Thoreau’s era, Martin Luther King Jr.’s era, but now, in current opposition against President Trump’s inauguration. As with every controversy, civil disobedience is met with two conflicting sides: is it wrong to break a law in any circumstance or should citizens be allowed to protest to bring change to the government? The core of a democratic-republic country is it’s citizens.…
- 696 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
How can disobeying ever be civil? Civil disobedience is not and will never be truly peaceful. If you look at some of the cases in history which started out as civil disobedience such as the French Revolution may I remind you of what resulted from that, thousands and thousands of deaths, some of maybe innocent people! Especially in our society, where people tend to turn to violent actions, will civil disobedience ever truly be peaceful? Or will it just be the door way to revolt and chaos. This is the question you must ask yourself while contemplating if it is just or not. All I have to say to you is, what has resulted from your own experiences of disobedience, because if they have resulted in reward than you can get back to me. It is no secret that America is a perfect society, but that should not compel the citizens to respond in civil…
- 1218 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Civil Disobedience It is seldom that breaking the law is justifiable, but when the law is unjust, it is up to the people to bring attention to it. Civil disobedience is a peaceful form of protest “with the aim of bringing about a change in laws or government policies” (Brownlee). Antigone buries her brother in an act of civil disobedience when her uncle prohibits his burial. Just as Antigone accepted her death sentence, those who participate in civil disobedience “are willing to accept the legal consequences of their actions” (Brownlee).…
- 623 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“Civil disobedience, also known as passive or non-violent resistance, is defined as purposely disobeying the law based on moral or political principles. ”- Janell Blanco. In a world full of unoriginality and and people only conforming to how everyone else thinks they are supposed to, disobedience is a valuable human trait because it helps you grow as a person, and it promotes finding your truth path in life. Growing as a person is not easily done.…
- 491 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Thoreau was once sent to jail for refusing to pay his taxes and I support this episode of civil disobedience as justified. Thoreau did not pay his taxes because he objected the use of the revenue to finance the Mexican War and enforcement of slavery laws. He did not request for his money to be used for the enforcement of slavery laws, therefore felt he had the right to protest and act out civil disobedience. Paul Harris defines civil disobedience as "an illegal, public, nonviolent, conscientiously motivated act of protest, done by someone who accepts the legitimacy of the legal and political systems and who submits to arrest and punishment" (2). Before I supported his civil disobedience, I opted to see if it was justified.…
- 521 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Civil disobedience is without a doubt one of the most effective ways to generate support for a change that can be safely practiced in modern circumstances. Very rarely has civil disobedience been taken into effect without generating some kind of change. Because of this, it is easy to see why it is practiced so often. One argument against civil disobedience that is frequently used is how it disrupts the flow of society.…
- 513 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays