Barry Minkow started a carpet cleaning business in his garage at the age of 16. One year later, Barry decided that hid business does not bring him much profit and began his fraudulent activities. He was running false credit card charges on clients' cards and check kiting. However, he was able to commit fraud on a large scale, when he gathered enough of a balance sheet built off fraudulent transactions. His major crimes were perpetrated against banks and investors by committing financial statement fraud. Such activities enabled him to obtain cash through bank loans and investment funds. Barry had fixed assets on the balance sheet that were fictitious. However, his major falsification was from grossly overstated revenue from restoration projects. His carpet cleaning company had morphed into a restoration-remediation company seemingly overnight, which greatly increased his revenue without increasing transaction volume. In order to validate the contracts, he set up two shadow companies whose sole purpose were to provide proof that the contracts…
Suggest how a financial forensic investigation could have detected fraud in the organization that you…
By fabricating over 20,000 documents Barry Minkow, Mark Morze, and a few other insiders were able to fool investors, auditors, banks, and whoever else that was interested in the success of a small carpet cleaning company that made it big. Like all frauds they eventually get blown wide open. In this case it was a young female journalist writing a filler piece on Barry Minkow’s success. When tying the story up she decided to make a call to the city just to verify their contractor’s license number, which never existed. The ZZZZ Best case is relevant for getting into the field of auditing and forensic accounting work because, it is important to conduct due diligence and keep professional skepticism no matter how inept a client may come off.…
Crazy Eddie Electronics Stores a chattered company, traded under the symbol CRXY on the New York Stock Exchange. The company was under management of Eddie Antar family from 1971 until 1987 when Oppenheimer-Palmieri Fund (OPF) took over the company as a result of proxy bid (Sanburn, 2012). After a very short time; however, Oppenheimer-Palmieri Fund management decided to suspend the entire board of directors under the governance of the Eddie Antar family to allow room for investigation of a possible fraudulent paradigm in the company (Silverstone, 2005).…
1. Ernst & Whinney never issued an audit opinion on financial statements of ZZZZ Best but did issue a review report on the company's quarterly statements for three months ended July 31, 1986. How does a review differ from an audit particularly in terms of the level of assurance implied by auditor's report?…
With the development of the stock markets and the huge grow in the volume of money traded in them, over the past 20 years a rising attention has been aimed at towards the importance of truthful and fair accounting. The real interest in how companies chase their financial reporting has developed in the wake of a multitude of large corporate scandals that has occurred worldwide. Two of the best known examples so far for significant manipulation of accounting data and the consequences thereof are the collapses of Enron and World Com.…
The case is about an accounting fraud that involves the Jamaica Water Properties, Inc. The fraud was characterized by misapplication of purchase method of accounting for acquisitions, recording fictitious assets, improper accounting for NOLCO, non-recording of appropriate allowances for uncollectible receivables, and misapplication of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting for long-term contracts. Ernest Grendi made the fraud possible, company CFO as helped by three senior accountants. These were aimed to inflate the price of the company stocks because of overstated earnings that caused them to receive sizable bonuses. However, JWP internal auditors just tolerated all of these because of their fear of being fired. In addition, Ernst & Young, the company’s external auditor, knowing the fraudulent activities, have been issuing an unqualified opinion for six consecutive years. This has been seen as a product of the close relationship between Grendi and his co-conspirators with E&Y.…
There are numerous differences between performing a review and actual audit on the financial statements, but the major one is that the review does not contemplate obtaining an understanding of internal control structure. Also, a review does not assess control risk, tests of accounting records and responses to inquiries by obtaining corroborating evidence through inspection, observation or any other audit procedure. It can point out significant matters of the financial statements but does not provide assurance of their accuracy. The issue with ZZZZ Best case is that the auditors review was not sufficient enough to review any misstatements on the financial statements. Erns & Whinney never questioned the internal control, reviewed contractual agreements or made comparison of the previous statements. If they had done any of the above, they would have revealed a glitch in the system. In addition, the review does not provide the assurance that an audit opinion would do on the financial statement.…
Fraud is a real threat to the financial stability of a corporation and even the country. The legal issues presented in the article show how damaging fraud truly is. Of the over 1,200 companies that filed for bankruptcy in the study, 77.8% had some sort of fraud (Nogler & Inwon, 2011). These numbers show that…
2. Ernst & Whinney never issued an audit opinion on financial statements of ZZZZ Best but did issue a review report on the company’s quarterly statements for the three months ended July 31, 1986.…
Corporate governance is the oversight of a company's management performance and ethics by its board of directors.…
What do Jeff Skilling, Bernie Ebbers, Dennis Kozlowski, John Rigas, Sanjay Kumar, Walter Forbes, Joe Nacchio, Richard Scrushy, Sam Waksal, and Martin Grass all have in common? They were all CEOs of prominent public companies, convicted of big-time corporate fraud and sentenced to lengthy prison terms.…
Madura, Jeff. What Every Investor Needs to Know About Accounting Fraud. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004. 1-156…
At an early age, Barry Minkow was introduced to the carpet cleaning industry by his mother who worked part time as a telephone solicitor for a small carpet cleaning company. This insight of the industry allowed Minkow to understand that the carpet cleaning industry was one which had very few barriers to entry, no licensing requirements, and required only a small amount of capital to enter. Also, because of these few barriers to entry, the industry has historically attracted a larger number of faulty startups in comparison to other industries. At 16 years old, Minkow started his carpet cleaning company under the name of ZZZZ Best Company. Right away he had a difficult time with customer complaints, stringent competition, and the inability to collect all checks, and vendors insistent on collecting payments. These all combined together prevented ZZZZ Best from becoming anything but marginally profitable, which was a red flag for banks who wouldn’t lend Minkow money. The fraud started when Minkow started to come up with his own innovative ways to finance his business, including: check kiting, credit card forgeries, and the staging of thefts to fleece his insurance company. Minkow was smooth and had charm which allowed all of these false financing options to be possible. Minkow’s success at beating the system encouraged him to further exploit fraudulent activities in different areas. Minkow befriended numerous friends whom aided his fraudulent activities, including an insurance claims adjuster. Minkow promised to pay this adjuster $100 per week if he would confirm to banks that ZZZZ Best was the recipient of occasional insurance restoration contracts. Minkow used these phony insurance restoration contracts to generate the paper profits and revenues that were needed to convince bankers to loan his business money. Minkow also created phony financial statements in order to complete these loans. Soon, insurance…
Fraud Examination and auditing are very much related, but is not the same thing. Because most occupational frauds are financial crimes, there is necessarily a certain degree of auditing involved. A fraud examination involves a lot more than just a review of financial records. Other than a review of financial information a fraud investigation involves interviews, statement analysis, and also public record searches, and also forensic documentation examination. There are also major differences between the two procedures around the scope, objectives, and underlying presumptions.…