Preview

Adjournment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4261 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Adjournment
ADJOURNEMENT

 Definition
Adjournment may be defined a s a putting off until another time or place . In other words, it is a putting off or postponing of business or of a session until another time or place; the act of a court, legislative body, public meeting, or officer, by which session or assembly is dissolved, either temporarily or finally, and the business in hand dismissed from consideration, either definitely or for interval. If the adjournment is final, it is said to be sine die. No appointed date for resumption .
However, the proper definition of adjournment is to “postpone, suspend or transfer proceedings”. The lawyer may apply for an adjournment for a short period or for a long term if it necessary for him especially in situations where he or she is caught off guard by what has transpired during a trial. Court usually will grant the application of adjournment if in the opinion of the court that it will avoid of hardship to the parties involved. However, the court may exercise his discretion if in the opinion of the prosecutor that, by the effluxion of time would most certainly affect the ability of his or her witnesses to recall facts.
For example in the case of PP v Tanggaah as states by Sharma J
“...that the longer a period is allowed to elapse from the time of the incident to the time of giving evidence in court, the greater the chances are for confusion to occur and for truth to be obscured”.

 Stage of an adjournment
The prosecution and the defence counsel may at any time during the trial apply to the court for postponement and adjournment. The application must be made in writing with the cogent reason stated comply with the application. Then the court will look into the reason stated and determine whether the application should be granted or not. Whatever the decision made the magistrate shall be in writing and be signed and also states the reason of his decision.
Thus, an adjournment may be applied at any stage of trial if in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The law is all around settled that the choice to concede a preliminary injunction rests in the sound watchfulness of the trial court. A trial court will be found to have mishandled its caution just when it has "exceeded the limits of reason or contradicted the unconstructed…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John R. Harig Case Study

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    MILLERSBURG — Found competent to stand trial, outstanding motions to dismiss the charge against a Marshallville man and have the amount of bail revisited will have to wait for another day, one on which he can be in court with his attorney.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The decision whether or not to keep the accused on remand is made by the police until they appear in court which is usually the following day.…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bail Court Research Paper

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Court cannot conduct a mini trial at the time of considering a bail application.141 At the stage of granting of bail, the Court can only go into the question of the prima facie case established for granting bail. It cannot go into the question of credibility and reliability of the witnesses put up by the prosecution. The question of credibility and reliability of prosecution witnesses can only be tested during the trial.142 The Court is not expected to go deep into the probative value of the material on record in bail matters. This is to be considered and taken into account by the Trial Court at appropriate stage after evidence.143 In a case relating to allegation of torture of wife, it was contended…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court’s judgment in R. v. Morin (1992) 1 SCR 771, set out “administrative guidelines” regarding claims made involving section 11(b) of the Charter, and how to assess the reasonableness of institutional delay. Some of the factors that the Supreme Court considers in regards to whether a delay is reasonable or not includes reasons for the delay, length of the delay, prejudicial effect on the Appellant and any waiver of time periods. In R v. Morin, on behalf of the majority, Sopinka J. explained that depending on the presence or absence of prejudice, the administrative guidelines for institutional delay could be adjusted. Between committal and trial, an eight to ten months administrative guideline was establish by the Court for Provincial Court cases, and following a preliminary hearing a delay of an additional six to eight months is considered reasonable. In R. v. Jordan case, the judge found 32.5 months institutional delay and a two months total Crown delay. Of the 32.5 months institutional delay, overwhelmingly lack of resources caused 19 months of delay in Provincial Court. After examining the total amount of institutional/Crown delay, the judge concluded that this delay “substantially exceeded” the guidelines set out by Morin, but, on its own, it is not an unreasonable delay. The Appellant submitted an application for a stay of proceedings that was dismissed by the trial judge, because the judge concluded, the prejudice experienced by Jordan resulting from the delay was not substantial. According to the judge, the delays were institutional and the Appellant charges were more serious. Any meaningful prejudice experienced by Jordan was not significant. Also, because of a prior conviction, he was subject to a conditional sentence order; his bail condition did not have any significant impact on him and while on bail he was also able to find employment. Thus, the Appellant…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Answer: A trial judge has broad discretion to deny a motion for severance even when counsel demonstrate that two defendants will present conflicting and irreconcilable defenses.…

    • 6041 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People can sue each other for money but can’t put each other in jail, only the state has the right too.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2nd exam notes

    • 754 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Appeals must be filed within a timely manor, no set time because various jurisdictions have different times…

    • 754 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court will be announced. I believe that the case should be held at a later date…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The example provided in the speech surrounded a conversation between a married couple with the wife asking where her husband was at. The presumption is that the husband would is lying if he failed to answer the question. This does not prove the husband was lying. For all we know, he could have been planning a surprise for his wife. According to Mourer (2015), “adversary presentation is the only effective means for combating the natural human tendency to judge too swiftly” (p. 1107). Simply put, we allow our own biases to interfere with our criminal justice system and daily,…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution provides the highest level of law in the United States. The first ten amendments of the Constitution make up the Bill of Rights and within this, there are several rights that an accused person may exercise before, during and after a criminal trial. The Fifth Amendment states a defendant has the right to remain silent and cannot be forced to testify against himself. The Fifth Amendment also covers against double-jeopardy. The accused cannot be charged for the same crime, twice.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the judge at trial must be allowed to have the power to engage in the decision making process of…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    new trial or refer the matter to the Court of Appeal. The Minister is not responsible for deciding…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Given that human memory can be manipulated and distorted using questioning techniques, it is worthwhile to consider other methods of obtaining evidence. Eyewitness testimony should however be used in conjunction with other methods of evidence such as DNA testing to obtain the most accurate evidence to use in a court case. Provided the severe consequences of false memory on eyewitness testimoney, courts should give a great ammount of consideration to the possibility of false memory before charging someone. Otherwise, eyewitness testimony may continue to place innocent citizens behind bars and therefore remain as an impediment to…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal Justice

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages

    *Criminal defendants have the right to remain silent at their trial. They invoke this right by not taking the witness stand. A defendants dedcision not to testify is final, the prosecutor is not permitted to call the defendant as a witness. If the defendant wants to anwere/ take the stand then he is allowed to, there the prosecutor can ask…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays