Whenever someone states the country of Canada most people from other countries think of cold weathers, Mounties and people living in igloos. The reality is far from being that with there being warm summers and police with much better vehicles other than a horse. The country has a good government and a good justice system. Like most systems, the justice system in Canada is far from being perfect. There are multiple occasions where people are convicted of committing a crime that they truthfully did not do. One of that being Guy Paul Morin a Canadian citizen who was convicted for the murder and rape of his 9 year old neighbor Christine Jessop just for being weird. People can learn from Guy Paul Morin by him showing that the justice system has…
Attending the Program of Legal Studies for Native People in Saskatoon and the Anishinaabe law camp at Neyaashiinigmiing rooted an aspect of reciprocity between Indigenous knowledge and Canadian Law into my studies. I strive to maintain my unique perspective by connecting with elders, participating in ceremonies and learning the…
The United States government is based on a checks and balances type system. The three main parts of this system are the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. This judicial system’s job is to uphold the law of the land. Law can be defined as a set of rules or norms of conduct which mandate, proscribe or permit specified relationships among people and organizations, provide methods for ensuring the impartial treatment of such people, and provide punishments for those who do not follow the established rules of conduct (Wikipedia.org, 2005). This is a very wide and all encompassing definition of the law and the governing judicial system. Just like the United States government the judicial system is broken up into different checks, balances, and systems. Two of these main systems are the juvenile justices system and the adult justice system. The obvious difference between these two courts is that the juvenile system is designed to handle youth offenders and the adult system is designed to handle adult offenders. Both of these two systems despite their difference have the same end goal; to administer justice. In the pages to follow we will discuss the big picture of the juvenile justice system, go over a point by point comparison between the juvenile system and the adult system, touch on both the benefits and disadvantages to being tried as a minor in the juvenile court from the perspective of a minor, and review the societal implication of abolishing the juvenile court system.…
The United States Court system is much the same for Juvenile Court, as it is for Adult Court. The main differences are that Adult court adjudicates offenders over the age of 18. Juvenile court adjudicates minors, or persons under the age of 18. However, certain circumstances like the severity of crime, and age of individual, and number of occurrences can present a case, which a minor is tried as an adult and sent to adult court.…
Matt Taibbi’s novel, The Divide: American Injustice in the Age of the Wealth Gap, provides an in-depth look into the inequality of the justice system. By reading his book, I feel I have learned much more about the struggles lower class people face and the privilege given to those in higher classes. With this newfound knowledge, I can convey these issues to my residents, as well, in order to allow them to be further conscious of their actions and mindful of the different challenges associated with…
The film No place called Home provides a realistic illustration of what it is like to be a family living in poverty within Canada. Leslie Harman provides readers with an article that outlines specific definitions and concepts to help illustrate the idea of poverty. These examples help to understand the Rice’s living conditions in the movie entitled “No Place Called Home”. Through understanding Harman’s article as well as various other sociological concepts it can be understood that the Rice family exhibits the characteristics regarding what its like to be living in poverty.…
The goal of this paper is to prove, using distinctive evidence that the Canadian Criminal Justice System is unfair. This paper argues that many Canadians of different race, religion, and sexual orientation are treated unfair in the Criminal Justice System. It is extremely important to argue that the Canadian Criminal Justice System is unfair because most Canadians are unaware of the vast majority of hate crimes committed by the police. As mentioned previously, the majority of Canadians are overall pleased with the Criminal Justice System, however, they may not be aware of the victims affiliated to the unfairness of the justice system.…
The potential of an innocent person wrongfully being arrested, convicted, and punished has always been a risk and a fear on our justice system. As the justice system is handled by humans, it is bound to make mistakes and such errors can lead to circumstances in which an innocent is found guilty; this is called a miscarriage of justice. Miscarriage of justice means the failure of a judicial system or court in the administration of justice, especially when an innocent is convicted in a crime. An example would be the wrongful conviction of David Milgaard involving the rape and murder of Gail Miller back in 1969. The Canadian justice system failed tremendously wasted millions of dollars and lost the public confidence of the system. More importantly, this even took away two decades of one man’s life. The factors of social perception of deviance, the influence of the media, and the misconception of investigating police and prosecution played a substantial role in the resulting miscarriage of justice. The Canadian justice system did indeed fail David Milgaard because there was not enough valid evidence to hold him as guilty in the time since his conviction.…
health of Canadians is provided. Increasing poverty is seen to go handin-hand with increasing income inequality.…
1. The risk of crime and victimization to Canadians and its costs to taxpayers and to victims…
Michael Becker, a public defender in Orange County visited our class. Public defenders are people who defense for people who cannot afford to hire a lawyer. Public Defenders consider their clients as the most important thing, and they treat their clients with dignity and respect since most of their clients are on the margins of the society, and they are not treated with respect. Even though public defenders receive funding from the government, they do not represent the government. Orange county had public offenders for 70 years, which is longer than the federal public offenders with the history of 50 years. I could tell public defenders disliked the district attorneys by Michael’s description of district attorneys and the way he talks about…
Grant, T. (2012). The changing face of poverty in Canada. The Globe And Mail. Retrieved from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/…
Women are also among the poorest of the poor within Canada’s most vulnerable populations: Aboriginal people, people from racialized communities, recent immigrants (many of whom are also from racialized communities), and persons with disabilities. As one report puts it, “Gender creates a cleavage of vulnerability that cuts across all other groups.”…
This theory grounds itself in the reality that if one wants to know what group in society is at the bottom, all one has to do is look at who is in prison. Inevitably, those at the lower end of the socio-economic scale find themselves in conflict with the law and in prison. Poverty is one of the best predictors of the chances of an individual coming into conflict with the law. Year after year, statistics confirm that Aboriginal people have lower life expectancies, lower levels of education, lower levels of income and higher incidences of poverty and disease. If an Aboriginal offender receives the same sentence as a non-Aboriginal offender, they are not likely to serve the same sentence. The Aboriginal offender is more likely to receive a higher classification level, serve more of his or her time in custody and more likely to have parole revoked. The criminal justice system is not a uniform or coherent whole across Canada and selective enforcement from police often occurs. Racial profiling or profiling based on one’s socio-economic status is a common practice undertaken by police officers in Canada. The systemic discrimination and racism in the criminal justice system is still very…
The battle between social control and the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadian citizens can be seen in the Canadian Criminal Justice System of today. Many criticize policing institutions of possessing excessive power where others feel that they do not have enough. Some feel the police do too little where the others feel police are too much of an interference. The question of when it is acceptable to sacrifice social freedoms in hope of overall comes down to the question of which is more effective: due process or crime control? Is what more police what Canada needs to deal with its delinquents or is it more of the enforcing of our rights freedoms that is more important. This controversial issue plays a major role in the Canadian Criminal Justice System as it must come to a delicate compromise of social control and due process.…