According to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act makes it unlawful for an employer to make employment-related decisions based on an employee's or a prospective employee's age. Here are several ways in which workers age 40 and above are covered:
• An employer can't make hiring decisions based on an applicant's age and he or she can't discriminate based on age when recruiting job candidates, advertising for a job or testing applicants.
• An employer can't fire a worker because of his age.
• An employer can't use age to classify, segregate or limit an employee if this will negatively affect the employee's status or deprive him or her of opportunities.
• An employer can't use age to determine an employee's pay.
• An employer can't deny benefits to an employee because of the employee's age. In some circumstances, however, the employer may provide reduced benefits to older workers if the cost of providing those reduced benefits matches the cost of providing benefits to a younger worker. In other words, the cost of providing the benefits to older workers and younger workers must be the same.
• An employee may take age into account when making an employment-related decision only if it is in regard to an authentic qualification necessary for the business's operation.
Age discrimination involves treating someone (an applicant or employee) less favorably because of his age. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) only forbids age discrimination against people who are age 40 or older. It does not protect workers under the age of 40, although some states do have laws that protect younger workers from age discrimination.
It is not illegal for an employer or other covered entity to favor an older worker over a younger one, even if both workers are age 40 or older.Discrimination can occur when the victim and the person who inflicted the discrimination are both over 40.
Age Discrimination & Work Situations
The law forbids discrimination when it comes to any aspect of employment, including hiring, firing, pay, job assignments, promotions, layoff, training, fringe benefits, and any other term or condition of employment.
Age Discrimination & Harassment
It is unlawful to harass a person because of his or her age.
Harassment can include, for example, offensive remarks about a person's age. Although the law doesn't prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that aren't very serious, harassment is illegal when it is so frequent or severe that it creates a hostile or offensive work environment or when it results in an adverse employment decision (such as the victim being fired or demoted).
The harasser can be the victim's supervisor, a supervisor in another area, a co-worker, or someone who is not an employee of the employer, such as a client or customer.
Age Discrimination & Employment Policies/Practices
An employment policy or practice that applies to everyone, regardless of age, can be illegal if it has a negative impact on applicants or employees age 40 or older and is not based on a reasonable factor other than age (RFOA).
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) protects individuals who are 40 years of age or older from employment discrimination based on age. The ADEA’s protections apply to both employees and job applicants. Under the ADEA, it is unlawful to discriminate against a person because of his/her age with respect to any term, condition, or privilege of employment, including hiring, firing, promotion, layoff, compensation, benefits, job assignments, and training. The ADEA permits employers to favor older workers based on age even when doing so adversely affects a younger worker who is 40 or older.
It is also unlawful to retaliate against an individual for opposing employment practices that discriminate based on age or for filing an age discrimination charge, testifying, or participating in any way in an investigation, proceeding, or litigation under the ADEA.
The ADEA applies to employers with 20 or more employees, including state and local governments. It also applies to employment agencies and labor organizations, as well as to the federal government. ADEA protections include:
• Apprenticeship Programs
It is generally unlawful for apprenticeship programs, including joint labor-management apprenticeship programs, to discriminate on the basis of an individual’s age. Age limitations in apprenticeship programs are valid only if they fall within certain specific exceptions under the ADEA or if the EEOC grants a specific exemption.
• Job Notices and Advertisements
The ADEA generally makes it unlawful to include age preferences, limitations, or specifications in job notices or advertisements. A job notice or advertisement may specify an age limit only in the rare circumstances where age is shown to be a “bona fide occupational qualification” (BFOQ) reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the business.
• Pre-Employment Inquiries
The ADEA does not specifically prohibit an employer from asking an applicant’s age or date of birth. However, because such inquiries may deter older workers from applying for employment or may otherwise indicate possible intent to discriminate based on age, requests for age information will be closely scrutinized to make sure that the inquiry was made for a lawful purpose, rather than for a purpose prohibited by the ADEA. If the information is needed for a lawful purpose, it can be obtained after the employee is hired.
• Benefits
The Older Workers Benefit Protection Act of 1990 (OWBPA) amended the ADEA to specifically prohibit employers from denying benefits to older employees. Congress recognized that the cost of providing certain benefits to older workers is greater than the cost of providing those same benefits to younger workers, and that those greater costs might create a disincentive to hire older workers. Therefore, in limited circumstances, an employer may be permitted to reduce benefits based on age, as long as the cost of providing the reduced benefits to older workers is no less than the cost of providing benefits to younger workers.
Employers are permitted to coordinate retiree health benefit plans with eligibility for Medicare or a comparable state-sponsored health benefit.
• Waivers of ADEA Rights
An employer may ask an employee to waive his/her rights or claims under the ADEA. Such waivers are common in settling ADEA discrimination claims or in connection with exit incentive or other employment termination programs. However, the ADEA, as amended by OWBPA, sets out specific minimum standards that must be met in order for a waiver to be considered knowing and voluntary and, therefore, valid. Among other requirements, a valid ADEA waiver must: o be in writing and be understandable; o specifically refer to ADEA rights or claims; o not waive rights or claims that may arise in the future; o be in exchange for valuable consideration in addition to anything of value to which the individual already is entitled; o advise the individual in writing to consult an attorney before signing the waiver; and o provide the individual at least 21 days to consider the agreement and at least seven days to revoke the agreement after signing it.
If an employer requests an ADEA waiver in connection with an exit incentive or other employment termination program, the minimum requirements for a valid waiver are more extensive. See Understanding Waivers of Discrimination Claims in Employee Severance Agreements" at http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/qanda_severance-agreements.html
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The ADEA prohibits policy’s that will have a harmful effect on individuals 40 or over unless the employer can prove the policy is based on a reasonable factor other than age. On March 30, 2012, the EEOC published its final ruling on reasonable factor other than age which took effect on April 30th 2012. An example of an employment practice based on a reasonable factor other than age is a physical fitness test. Obviously this type of test would likely put older applicants at a disadvantage but if the employer could prove that it was a legitimate business purpose for the individual to pass such a test they would be allowed to do so without reprimand.…
- 877 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Due to a 2009 ruling by the Supreme Court, discrimination based on age can sometimes be difficult to prove. However, in employee B’s case, they were informed that the hiring decision was based on their age. Employee B is 68 years old and is protected from this type of discrimination. This is definitely a violation of the ADEA…
- 600 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
However, if the employer can validate that age is an occupational qualification, this law would not apply. The law is administered and executed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and “[a] key objective of the law is to prevent financially troubled companies from singling out older employees when there are cutbacks” (Cascio, 2013, p. 109).…
- 1409 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) protects certain applicants and employees 40 years of age and older from discrimination on the basis of age in hiring, promotion, discharge, compensation, or terms,…
- 997 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended in 1986, protects employees who are 40 year old and over from discrimination in pay, benefits, or continued employment. Failure to comply with this law could result in lawsuits, back pay, and additional compensation for the employee filing the…
- 621 Words
- 3 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Age: the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) protects those ages 40 and over, it does not protect those under 40. Employers may favor an older worker over a younger worker, even if both are 40 or over. Issues may arise, though, when both the individual making the hire and the applicant are over age 40. Examples of age-based bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) are mandatory retirement ages for air traffic controllers [56, exceptions to 61] and airline pilots [65].…
- 1225 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Discrimination of Age: age separation includes treating somebody (a candidate or worker) less positively in view of his or her age. The Age Segregation in Work Act (ADEA) just prohibits age victimization individuals who are age 40 or more seasoned. It doesn't…
- 1836 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
The reason behind can be result-oriented system, where technique and pace of final product matter a lot. A believe that young employees make conducive atmosphere for work, on the contrary older employees have been in company for a long time, making them more loyal, that their younger counterpart. With the improving the health care, allowing people to live longer and healthier, in 1967 to prohibit age related discrimination ADEA (Age Discrimination in Employment Act) was enacted. It protected all the employees above the age of 40, against discriminatory behaviour on hiring or firing by employer, unions or any commercial organization, which adversely affect the employee although he is qualified for the position. ADEA has a narrow scope in comparison to Title VII as latter is a pure form of discrimination, where if not proved by employee, employer based on RFOA (reasonable factor other than age). Smith v. Jackson city employer practice of Wage hikes for the employees with 5 or less years in department was justified as encouragement for potential employees and shows no disparate impact on the old…
- 5250 Words
- 21 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) prohibits discrimination based on age, protecting employees over the age of forty. The protection applies to both employees and job…
- 793 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Now, according to the age discrimination in employee act 1967, section 623 it is completely unlawful for any employer or employment agency for failing or refusing employment or otherwise terminating employees because of an…
- 265 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There have been many laws implemented and policies implemented to deal with different types of discrimination against age. Before these policies were in play it was much harder for a person of old age to get a job and their old age may have been a major…
- 1570 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act or ADEA for short is an act in place to prevent employees from ages 40 and above from being fired so they could be replaced by younger individuals for a lower amount of income. This act was passed in 1968. This act helps keep income ongoing for the older generations retirement. It addresses the issue of poverty that our society is continuously going through. When this generations has the chance to retire since they have worked all those years in a company it gives them a peace of mind from the stress of life and potentially help them to live longer.…
- 1459 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Personally, I have never witnessed age discrimination, but I think it is morally wrong. I feel that individuals who are older should have the same opportunities and experiences as individuals who are young. Even though the younger generation is faster and more prone to succeeding with technology, older individuals have experience and wisdom to help and assist their consumers and clients. Because I have a passion for the older generation, I believe it is important to make them feel wanted and needed in our daily tasks and events. I have a very close family friend who is approximately 80 years old, and she continues to work for my local Walmart in my hometown. She has been with the company for a very long time, and although she cannot perform…
- 263 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Age discrimination is a kind of violation to human rights. Everyone has the right to receive equal opportunity regardless of age, and given fair chances…
- 1988 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
This definitely coincides with what I’ve already learned and recently read in our book about preventing age discrimination in the workplace. I do know that the organization has to make suitable arrangements for a place in the organization for employees if they get hurt on the job and can still do light work, within reasoning. I’ve learned that employers cannot make a difference in an employee because of their age, only if one is more qualified for the job than the other or other employees taking on leadership better than the others when making promotional decisions. You can’t assume everyone has the same characteristics as the others. You have to look at each individual’s characteristics. Whether it’s intentional or not, discrimination can lead to serious negative consequences for the employer and even end-up in court, including reduced…
- 387 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays