Preview

Agricultural Subsidy

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3026 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Agricultural Subsidy
Agricultural subsidies and tariffs have been widely debated for several years and this is an issue that is not going away. There is no doubt that the subsidies and tariffs have benefits for some while simultaneously being detrimental to others. The chief area of concern is regarding the faceoff between developed nations, such as the United States and the European Union, and underdeveloped or growing nations, such as Brazil and African nations. What essentially is occurring is that a developed nation comes up with a price that they feel an agricultural product should be bought and sold at in the world market. Once they have this figure, if the going rate of the product dips below the number then the governments respond by giving subsidies to the farmers of their nation. These subsidies offset the dip in price and allow the developed nations farmers to still maintain their profit margin at no extra cost to them, while tariffs protect domestic farmers from cheaper, developing country export prices. If developed nations did not do this, farmers from their respective nations would not be able to compete with the far cheaper producers in developing nations. By doing so, richer nations are covering portions of the costs for the farmers allowing them to compete on the world market and in some cases dominate it. In developed nations if the subsidies were removed, it may in fact benefit the average consumer in those nations. They would be able to get their goods at a lower price while also not have to lose as much in taxes to pay for the subsidies. On the flip side, they might not have as much access to the products because in all likelihood the market for agricultural products would no longer appear feasible, thereby pushing producers out and depressing the supply. 1) background advantages and disadvantages of tariffs and subsidies 2) removal of tariffs and subsidies effect on developed nations 3) removal of tariffs and subsidies effect on developing nations and 4) a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    * When farmers in wealthy countries such as Europe and the US, produce too much, the extra produce is often sold to developing countries at vastly reduced prices. This then pushes down the price of local produce, so poor farmers can’t compete.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    History Study Notes

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    4. What argument do protectionists make in favor of a protective tariff? How do opponents of a protective tariff respond?…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. Over the past decade, the free trade movement has come under increasing fire as markets have opened and barriers to trade have fallen. Discuss the arguments against and for free trade, considering the perspective of both more developed and less developed nations. However, do you believe as international business student that benefits of free trade outweigh the drawbacks? Why or why not?…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Farm Subsidies

    • 2787 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The current Farm Bill is set to expire in 2012 and in this climate of spending reductions and budget balancing, there has been a lot of talk about reducing or eliminating many farm subsidies. The purpose of this paper and my research is to see what if any impact the elimination of the commodity subsidies would have on the local farming economy. The objectives of this paper are to examine the history of farm subsidies, the current Farm Bill, various commodity subsidy programs, criticisms of the current programs, and get a local perspective of the current effectiveness of the subsidy programs.…

    • 2787 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The impact of an import tariff in a small nation is entirely unlike then an import tariff from a larger nation. When smaller nations imposes a tariff, it does not affect world prices, however the price of the importable commodity will start to rise, usually by the amount of the tariff for manufacturers and trade in the small nation. When large nations impose a tariff, it will reduce the volume of trade. Large nation tariffs also improve terms of the nation’s trade. Since the volume of trade is being reduced, it tends to lesson the nation’s welfare. However it also can improve the nation’s welfare. It depends on the welfare of the nation to if it actually rises or falls depending on the two conflicting forces.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Agricultural adjustment agency was of slight significance as it, did not help to recover the nation. The idea behind Agricultural adjustment agency was to help farmers by controlling farm production and stabilising prices. It was an attempt to end the over-production and falling agricultural prices that had crippled American farmers. This however was not the case. The government paid farmers to produce less, by taking land out of the production or reducing their livestock. This resulted in less produce being produced meaning the prices were increased by nearly double. On one hand, the farmers’ income was doubled from 1933 to 1939, however on the other hand the citizens have to spend more of their money more for produce that wasn’t getting…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the mid 1830s - 1860, cotton accounted for more than half the value of all…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During World War I, England's agricultural economy was badly damaged. This inconvenience for the English was a blessing to American farmers. Since the invention of the combine, and various other mechanical harvesting machines, American farmers could increase their crop yield. In turn they could export the extra crops to England for more money. Once England got back on it's feet, American farmers could not find any exports for their crops. As they continued to produce more than the American people could consume, the prices of agricultural goods dramatically dropped. By the 1930's many farmers were in serious need of help, with heavy farm loans and mortgages hanging over their head's. Nothing had been done to help the farmer's during The Hoover Administration. So in 1933 as part of Roosevelt's New Deal, the Secretary of Agriculture, Henry Wallace devised a plan to limit production and increase prices. Which came to be known as the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933, also known as the AAA. The AAA was established on May 12, 1933 it was the New Deal idea to assist farmers during the Great Depression. It was the first widespread effort to raise and stabilize farm prices and income. The law created and authorized the Agricultural Adjustment Administration to: Enter into voluntary agreements to pay farmers to reduce production of basic commodities ( cotton, wheat, corn, rice, tobacco, hogs, milk, etc..), to make advanced payments to farmers who stored crops on the farm, create marketing agreements between farmers and middlemen, and to levy processing taxes to pay for production adjustments and market development. Basically the AAA paid farmers to destroy their crops and livestock in return for cash. In 1933 alone cotton farmers were paid $100 million to plow over their cotton crop. Six million piglets were slaughtered by the government after they bought them from farmers. The meat was canned and given to people without jobs. In order…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. Federal government as assisted sugar producers for over one hundred years with the use of tariffs. Twenty-six years ago the congress passed the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 by which they assisted the agricultural industry. The bill was aimed at helping most of the agricultural sector. I will be discussing the impacts it has had on sugar producers in particular. The the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 has helps farmers by placing a tariff on sugar import after a certain weight has been imported into the country. In addition, the Department of Agriculture also provides loans to sugar producers to make sure the can profit. In a free market American sugar producers would not be able to stay in business due to other nations significantly lower production costs. The loan can be paid back with cash if market prices are higher or they can just give the sugar to the government which will pay off the loan regardless of world market prices (About Sugarcane). This has led to sugar producer to become dependent on government assistance which in turn has taken away the incentive for sugar producer to grow other crops. Another consequence is the American consumer has historically paid more for sugar the rest of the…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    American Agriculture - 1

    • 3181 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Agriculture is a large part of the American economy and plays a major role in domestic affairs, even though there are foreign implications, such as aid to other poor, foreign countries in the form of food. Because agriculture is vital to keeping the domestic economy stable, the federal government has and had passed farm bills that give governmental subsidies to farmers, allowing them to “artificially inflate prices” of farm products. Another component of the agricultural issue is the issue of immigration. A large portion of Hispanic immigrants work in the agricultural industry and they produce about 20% of the total agricultural production. Republicans want to get rid of those illegal immigrants who work in the agricultural industry because that is their stance on immigration specifically. Democrats want to keep illegal immigrants because they produce a large portion of agricultural products, and because it is their stance on immigration. Ever since the beginning of the United States, wheat has been the principal cereal crop; billions upon billions of bushels of all variety of wheat have and are exported to many countries. On the whole aspect of agriculture, the United States is fourth largest nation producing food in general. Foreign competition such as China, Europe, and India fiercely compete throughout the globe and in the international market of food products. Current policies regarding agriculture consists of mostly farm bills that are directed towards assisting the farmer in economical ways such as subsidies, price support, and many other ways. One of the most recent farm bill enacted by Congress was under the presidency of George W. Bush, and it sends approximately $300 billion to farmers. In addition, a recent trend of renewing old farm bills, or creating whole new bills, has begun, and current of last year, the farm bill that was enacted was an extension of an old farm bill that isn’t as stable as farmers would have…

    • 3181 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are some advantages and disadvantages for the buyers as well. The advantages are- there's less money spent on production cost and the firms will make their prices quite affordable, since there will be competition between them, to make more profit than the other firms. There are some disadvantages as well, such as- Subsidy money can make the workers inefficient and the products not to a very high quality, because they know they'll receive the money no matter the end product. There could be a mass production of a particular item, so the price of it goes down, which is very…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the major areas in which the government intervenes is in the agricultural sector of the economy. The government has three ways it can intervene and help its producers. These ways include price policies, direct payments, and input policies. Price policies have the largest effect on producers. Tariffs, quotas, and taxes are just a few examples of price policies. While these policies bring revenue into the government, in the end they hurt consumers. Each of these policies raise the prices of both imported and native goods. They are designed to help stabilize prices and give the native producers a chance to compete with foreign goods. Under the doctrine of laissez-faire, the government would not interfere with prices and the native producers would be forced to lower their prices, giving the nation's citizens a better deal in the market.…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For decades the rich countries of the developed world have levied subsidies on their farmers typically guaranteeing them a minimum price for the products they produce. The aim has been to protect the domestic industry from the foreign competition and give an impact on the average consumer in develop nations such as the United States and the EU countries…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    pakistan studies

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Diplomats said one of the main issues they had was whether to pay subsidies for agricultural produce. Poor and emerging nations wanted the US and EU to lower subsidies on their agricultural exports.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lecture no.1 Economics – Meaning, Definitions, Subject matter of Economics – Traditional approach – consumption, production, exchange and distribution ECONOMICS Economics is popularly known as the “Queen of Social Sciences”. It studies economic activities of a man living in a society. Economic activities are those activities, which are concerned with the efficient use of scarce means that can satisfy the wants of man. After the basic needs viz., food, shelter and clothing have been satisfied, the priorities shift towards other wants. Human wants are unlimited, in the sense, that as soon as one want is satisfied another crops up. Most of the means of satisfying these wants are limited, because their supply is less than demand. These means have alternative uses; there emerge a problem of choice. Resources being scarce in nature ought to be utilized productively within the available means to derive maximum satisfaction. The knowledge of economics guides us in making effective decisions. The subject matter of economics is concerned with wants, efforts and satisfaction. In other words, it deals with decisions regarding the commodities and services to be produced in the economy, how to produce them most economically and how to provide for the growth of the economy. Subject matter of economics Economics has subject mater of its own . Economics tells how a man utilises his limited resources for the satisfaction of unlimited wants. Man has limited amount of time and money. He should spend time and money in such away that he derives maximum satisfaction. A man wants food, clothing and shelter. To get these things he must have money. For getting money he must make an effort. Effort leads to satisfaction. Thus, wants- efforts- satisfaction sums up the subject mater of economics initially in a primitive society where the connection between wants efforts and satisfaction is direct . Divisions of Economics The subject matter of economics…

    • 24876 Words
    • 100 Pages
    Good Essays