Preview

Alexander The Great

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1330 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alexander The Great
Alexander III of Macedon also known as, Alexander the Great, made a name for himself many years ago, but today his “greatness” is being questioned because of research conducted due to modern technology. To be viewed as great, one would need lots of evidence supporting they are a well-rounded person. I believe that Alexander had rightfully earned this title because through my research I have only found evidence that Alexander was a man of greatness. Although Alexander displayed many characteristics of greatness there are three that have stood out me, his strategy, selflessness, and influence. These reasons show clear support that Alexander was Great and never anything less.
The first reason why I believe Alexander is great is because of his
…show more content…
Document B highlights a battle in which Alexander is fighting against another civilization. In Document B it states “When Alexander saw this, he [decided to] move his troops in all different directions so that Porus would keep puzzled... Alexander then threw his cavalry in a circle around the entire force, and ordered the infantry to lock shields, to group tightly and to advance as a phalanx.” When Alexander decided to change the way he positioned his troops to confuse the Porus it shows that he used strategy to change the playing field to help him. Alexander knew that by doing this his rivals would be expecting one thing and would be receiving another. By using a unique method Alexander can secure a win for himself in a smart and efficient way, highlighting a trait that shows one's greatness. The evidence found in Document A and B show that Alexander shows the strong understanding of strategy, therefore, showing he has a trait of greatness.
Another trait displayed by Alexander showing his greatness is his extreme selflessness. A leader who is selfless will put others before
…show more content…
In Document E, there is a chart which consists of data and one of the strongest pieces that defends his ability to influence is “Number of years Greek remained the official language of Jordan - 1,000” When Alexander came into Asia Minor he set out with the plan to free his people and spread his culture, but the length that his effects stayed in Asia Minor were simply due to the amount of influence placed on the people. The fact that Alexander can change the people of Jordan’s language to Greek shows that the people believed and agreed with him. Teaching a country a new language is difficult, but pulling through and having the people master and use the language is a task that can only do by a select group of people. This example from Document E shows Alexander's s ability to not only influence large groups of people, but to also make sure that his ways will stay with them for many years to go. Document F also focuses on Alexander's cultural effect to a different civilization, located by the Hindu Kush. The text talks about how people viewed Alexander as brave and kind and that when he decided to leave India some of his men decided to stay and create a new life in India. “Some of our [Kalish] words are the same as theirs, out music and out dancing too; we worship the same gods. This is why we believe the Greeks are our first ancestors.” Alexander and his people may

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Alexander the Great had a military upbringing and lived a life that was shaped by militarism. He led the Macedonian army successfully to expand Greece and conquer the east. The Macedonian army mass success is attributed to the Alexander’s philosophical influence that led him to adapt to conditions, and use mindful tactics when leading his army.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Alexander Succeed

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander achieved many things that would be considered unachievable by many in that era. However, with his achievements came mistakes, or as some might say a God like complex. No matter, whichever way you look at it, he succeeded where others failed. Alexander wanted to be greater than his father, and he certainly achieved this goal. However, Alexander had a different way of doing things, he did not want to just conquer lands and take over the inhabitant’s lifestyle, but instead he tried to teach them new ideas and a new way of living.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Traditionally it is assumed that he was a reactionary, unlike the reformer his father, Alexander II, had been. However, as so often the case, this interpretation of Alexander III’s rule is undisputed. There is much reason to believe that despite some different policies, ultimately both men wanted to reach the same goals. Alexander III unquestionably did undermine the reforming policies of his father, but the underlying reasons for this are not so obvious.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    From a young age, Alexander’s education trained him to be a successful conqueror with an alpha mindset. “Alexander's academic learning was cut short when he was 16. His father brought Alexander to the battlefield to improve his military capabilities” (McGill). Compared to other leaders, Alexander had first hand experience on the battlefield. This improved his knowledge of combat, and likely changed major aspects of Alexander’s strategies and…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alison Fong Ms. Wetzel English II Honors, Period 3 20 October 2014 Alexander the Great: The Military Genius Imagine crossing thousands of miles of scorching desert, rugged mountains and endless plains on both foot and horseback while commanding and maneuvering an army. Throughout history, there have been legends of heroes facing impossible trials. Alexander the Great is a legendary figure that did the impossible. Leading thousands of men across a continent is challenging enough on its own, but Alexander the Great took this challenge even further. He took the most demanding and laborious paths possible during his campaign to expand his empire, and he succeeded (Romey).…

    • 2296 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great was a lord of Macedonia in Ancient Greece. He was conceived in Macedonia in 356 BC. He was guided by Aristotle and turned into the ruler of Macedonia at 20 years old. He was known for building a major realm crosswise over numerous Greek settlements. Along these lines, Greek culture was spread out along numerous urban communities all through the Near East. The Greek culture spreading along the Near East was something worth being thankful for Greece since it enabled them to impact culture and dialect into different urban communities. It wasn't such something worth being thankful for the general population that lived in the Near East urban communities and past in light of the fact that they didn't get the chance to build up…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great is often thought of as the greatest military commander that the world has ever seen. He was born in July of 356 B.C to King Philip II of Macedonia and Olympias. Since his youth, Alexander was tutored and trained by great philosophers such as Aristotle and Leonidas. His legacy of greatness started with the taming of the wild horse, Bucephalus. Alexander of Macedonia is worthy of the title, Great, due to his strategic military operations, his expansion of the Greek Empire, and the cultural diffusion of the Greeks across the world.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When observing the qualities of a person, usually what are taken in account are that person’s actions. Alexander the Great, possibly one of the greatest war generals/kings of all time, was a gifted young man for his tactical strategies for battle. Through his victories and successes, he conquered a majority of the world. Plutarch writes a biography on Alexander, in which he includes his own views, which may or may not agree with other historians (though Plutarch’s accuracy may not be considered 100% seeing as he was alive a very long time after the king of Macedonia was dead), about Alexander: he was strong, confident, and audacious.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anita I agree with you. Alexander the Great was able to manage his resources and maneuver his troops into positions that made his forces more effective. Alexander’s ability to use his limited resources effectively made his assault on the larger military more efficient. Alexander was able to accomplish more with less because of his effective use of resources which made his army more efficient overall.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander III

    • 2638 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Alexander III did not posses the qualities necessary for a successful ruler of late 19th-century Russia” – to what extent to you agree with this judgement?…

    • 2638 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander the Great

    • 1216 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great was a conqueror and King of Macedonia prior to the Hellenistic Period. He succeeded to the throne after Phillip II of Macedon’s death brought his reign to an end. However, the continuance of the promised legacy his father left behind did not satisfy this power crazed King for fame and glory. Alexander the Great’s resentment towards his father led him to continue conquering because he wanted to overshadow his father. Under his headship, his unification of Greek city-states led to one of the largest empires known today.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a youth Alexander set out with his army to Egypt with a confidence that he could do almost anything. After conquering Egypt he describes himself as being part god, to the dimay of some Greeks. He even refuses Darius’ offer for Alexander to marry his daughter, because he says he does not need his permission to marry Darius’ daughter. This part of Alexander’s life serves to show his “young and stupid” phase, where is extremely cocky, acting as if he could take over the entire world if he wanted to, even though he does see most of the world in terms of what people during Alexander’s time thought the world was. Although Alexander does become more wise to the ways of the world as he ages, he never really sheds his over-confidence until right before his death.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Ii and Reform

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander II executed many reforms during his time in power but did he reform for the sake of reforming? In the essay I will conclude whether or not Alexander had objectives in which reforming only partook as a secondary effect, and if so, what “was” he primarily?…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander the Great, Alexander III of Macedon, King of Macedonia, was born in July 356 BC in Pella, Macedonia. He was one of the greatest military geniuses in history. His father, Philip II of Macedon, was a brilliant ruler and strategist. His mother was Olympias, princess of Epirus, daughter of King Neoptolemus. Arixstandros Telmisy, a renowned dream interpreter, determined that Olympias was pregnant, and that the child would have the character of a lion.…

    • 2605 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander has traits to be an effective leader in wars. He born as a leader and knows how to get the soldiers to follow him and trust him. He takes an interpersonal role where he acts as a leader of his men and the population of the land that he conquers. Alexander is a good planner and organiser, he know his goal and have a strategy. He has also great ambition to do the best for himself and his people. Alexander wants to be seen as a hero, he love to manage and conquer. He is a good negotiator, as you can see in the movie for example when he and his father conquer Greece. The traits and behaviour that Alexander has is associated with derailment is that sometimes he shows very high self-esteem and He thinks that he can manage everything because of his very individualistic nature. Also he trust anyone and anything but himself. However, he needs to learn that sometimes he also needs to listen to his people and his followers to make decisions. Furthermore, another negative trait of Alexander is that he is very much impatient since he is so much fascinated by his ambitions that he couldn’t analyze the facts.…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays