Preview

How Did Alexander The Great Influence The Greek Military

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1175 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Alexander The Great Influence The Greek Military
2
Alexander the Great had a military upbringing and lived a life that was shaped by militarism. He led the Macedonian army successfully to expand Greece and conquer the east. The Macedonian army mass success is attributed to the Alexander’s philosophical influence that led him to adapt to conditions, and use mindful tactics when leading his army.
Alexander had military training and tactics from his father and learnings of philosophy from Aristotle. These set the base for him, and led to his ability to adjust his army to conditions. Alexander displayed awareness of logistics in his army. He considered every aspect, for example the routes taken and allies courted.2
In order to fulfill his conquests, he needed troops. In order to reach his goal
…show more content…
The phalanx was tight lines of men who could travel together, almost like a tank. The soldiers were given more compact shields that strapped to their arms. This allowed the formation to be even tighter and more stable. The soldiers were also equipped with spears and stabbing swords. The extra long spears allowed several ranks and lines of men to participate in the battle and decrease strain of the front line. The long spears also allowed for large scale attacks without enduring any severe losses. The big weapon of his army was also the cavalry. The army also had a large supply of horses, and men that man the horses and can fight on foot. In the phalanx, the men of high military expertise, the lochage, was in the front. The soldiers in front and rear would be the strongest soldiers. The phalanx offered impenetrable defense and was well fitted to wear down the enemy line (cite). The effectiveness of the phalanx was demonstrated through the fact that the army would beat enemies even when outnumbered. The phalanx provided a confident tight formation of soldiers surrounded by peers, and a wall of long spears.In addition to the phalanx, the army would have the calvary going into battlefield, flanking the opponents. Alexander reformed the phalanx. He made a way to increase mobility. His reform made it so the archers and javelin men could deploy into intervals and discharge their missiles, and then closing up again in order …show more content…
After defeating the Persian army in the battle at Granicus, the army moved south searching for the main force. The main force was led by the ruler of Persia, Darius. The battle happens in a narrow area between the gulf of Issus and mountains on November 5, 333 BC. The macedonian army used its phalanx, and Alexander used his tactics to adapt to the situation. The army had a phalanx in the center, hypaspists on the right, and companion cavalry with Alexander riding with them on the flank. On the left was a mix of heavy and light cavalry, with an infantry in reserve. Far right in the hills, the army had agrarians, elite javelin soldiers, and cavalry. The Macedonian army advances, protecting their flank. Alexander led an attack of the agrarians, and managed to drive off the heavy infantry. Meanwhile the rest of the macedonian cavalry on that flank drove off the persian cavalry. On the opposite flank, the Persian heavy cavalry succeeding in pushing back the weaker cavalry of the Macedonian army. Alexander responded to this by using his infantry. The Macedonians with this infantry put up a defensive line against a possible breakthrough. As the Persian line advanced, placing their flank in the air, they left themselves vulnerable. The Agrarians continued to pursue heavy infantry, while the cavalry turned on the flank of the infantry. Alexander in this moment saw Darius and advanced toward him. He believed that by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The pass was about 330 feet in width. Leonities tactics helped him defend the large Persian fleet by creating a battle formation called Phalanx formation in which the men formed a wall of overlapping shields and protruded their spears out from the sides of the shields. This war tactic helped defend the persian attack because since the pass was only 330 feet wide Xerxes couldn't call his army to all attack at once they had to attack in waves so that made it easier for the spartans to hold off the massive persian army. Xerxes attacked greece because Darius originally attacked Greece because the Athenians gave support to the "Ionian Revolt" against Persian rule in Asia Minor. Darius's army was decisively defeated at the Battle of Marathon in the first attempt to invade Greece. After Darius died his son, Xerxes, vowed revenge for his father's defeat at the Battle of…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While strongest at the front, the phalanx's main weakness was on the right flank and to the rear. Once engaged in battle the heavy armor and close quarters did not allow the phalanx to easily address attacks from either of those directions. Although the battle of Thermopylae was a decisive Persian victory, the employment of the phalanx formation proved to be a useful and superior strategy there as roughly fourteen hundred Hoplite led by King Leonidas and three hundred Spartans held their ground for a week (three spent fighting) halting Persian advancement and causing numerous casualties. Were it not for a traitor exposing a path to the rear of the Greek positionallowing the Persian forces to surround the Greek position, there's no way of knowing how long this small force could have fought or whether or not they could have been victorious.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following the Battle of Gaugamela, Alexander planned on deploying the same tactics used against the Persians during the battle in Issus. In reply, his generals disagreed with repeating that tactic as it would put Alexander in danger, it would leave the left and center unit weaken against Persian, and purpose that Alexander take the fight towards Darius together with his army. Alexander opposed to his general’s idea as he was very firmed on his own belief and reassured his generals that if he is able to immediately take out Darius again like at Issus (Yenne 73). The battle would be over as his non-Persian soldiers would have no motives to fight any more if their ruler had abandoned them. Hence, Alexander and his army marched out onto Gaugamela…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander was great because of his intelligence. In document B it states the story behind the last superior battle Alexander fought and how he used his intelligence to strike at the enemy Prince Porous.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his early age, Alexander The Great was involved in many battles and high command position. Alexander…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great is often thought of as the greatest military commander that the world has ever seen. He was born in July of 356 B.C to King Philip II of Macedonia and Olympias. Since his youth, Alexander was tutored and trained by great philosophers such as Aristotle and Leonidas. His legacy of greatness started with the taming of the wild horse, Bucephalus. Alexander of Macedonia is worthy of the title, Great, due to his strategic military operations, his expansion of the Greek Empire, and the cultural diffusion of the Greeks across the world.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is no lie that Alexander the Great was a great military leader. He studied battle strategies with military leaders before him, and it aided him in commanding his armies against empires like Persia. In this campaign particularly, it showed his…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Path

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the final years of Alexander’s father; Phillip the second was assassinated as King of Macedonia in the year of 336 B.C.E. (Reword this sentence a bit. During Alexander’s final teen years?) Alexander then took his place as King, and researched interests of science, and philosophy; educated by Aristotle. At the age of nineteen, Alexander first restored the Macedonian rule in Thessaly, and defeated the Thracians in the year of 335 B.C.E. After the first rulings of the western land, Alexander then turned to the Illyrians where he ravaged and ruled and became prime (do you mean that he demonstrated his stron military leadership?) Make sure that you use the sources as your voice. Again, this is one of those papers where your focus is on what you are learning from the primary sources that you read) in military leadership. As Greek lands became overruled during Alexander’s teenage years, Greek civilization turned to Alexander’s control. After the final fight in Thebes, Alexander became victorious, gained power and became a powerful leader to lead his military southward, where the turning point of his conquest began.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander the Great is without doubt one of the greatest military leaders of history. Not only did Alexander of Macedon conquer enormous areas of the known world but also he demonstrated dynamic leadership and masterful strategy on a large scale and tactics on the battlefield. During his life, he ruled the largest empire the world had ever seen, which stretched from ancient Greece to India. The son of King Phillip II of Macedon, Alexander was educated by the philosopher Aristotle and first led Macedonian troops at age 18. Many times Alexander was worshipped as a god in some of the countries he ruled. He had a huge impact on world history spreading the seeds of western culture and philosophy across the world and has legends and stories about him in over 80 languages. He was head strong, violent, extremely brave, politically cunning, loved by his men, and a gifted leader. Few individuals have had the sort of impact on history that Alexander did. With his death, what was called the Hellenic Age becomes the Hellenistic. No longer was Greece a minor collection of city states, but a mighty empire. The western world, for better and for worse, became almost a single place, united by a common culture that left its mark on language, literature, and politics.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    leader, and without his tactics, he would have never been able to conquer all that he…

    • 470 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great was King of Macedon, a state located in Northern Greece. Aristotle tutored him until the age of 16, and by the age of 30 he had created one of the largest empires in the ancient world. As he was undefeated in battle, Alexander is considered as one of history’s most successful military commanders and his battles and strategies are still taught at military schools worldwide.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle tutored Alexander for a total of three years until he was appointed as regent for King Phillip, but Aristotle did not depart for Athens until 335, the year after Phillip died (McKeon). With Alexander being only 13 years old, Aristotle got the opportunity to help shape the young man into a brilliant leader. As De Gaulle wisely stated in his book Army of the Future, “At the root of Alexander’s victories, one will always find Aristotle” (Lerner). Although a direct influence of Aristotle's philosophy cannot be seen, a further look at Alexander the Great’s battle strategies and accomplishments reveal a Greek quality, for he used Macedonian power to spread Greek culture throughout the extensive area he ruled over…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is impossible to explore the later facets of Alexander 's life without at least glimpsing the years of his childhood and early adulthood. Born to Phillip II of Macedonia and Olympias, Alexander was heir to the throne of Macedonia. Probably the most important influence in his young life was the tutoring he received from Aristotle and Leonidas starting around the age of thirteen. By Aristotle Alexander was imbued with an incredible background in science, literature, and rhetoric all of which would serve him well in the future. Though they did not always have like minds on subjects of policy it is clear that Alexander always kept his teachers musings in mind. Unfortunately his final reward for his teacher was the execution of Aristotle 's nephew Callisthenes many years later. Leonidas, was hired by Philip II to train and discipline Alexander 's body. He sent Alexander on frequent all night marches and rationed his food. Alexander 's schooling with his two teachers continued until he was 16 years old.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    No soldier in history is more indisputably "great" than Alexander, surpassing the majority even of good and eminent generals, as do Napoleon and very few others. What marks him out--even more than the quality both of his swift tactical insight and deliberate strategic planning - is the "daemonic" strength of will and leadership with which he dragged a war weary army with unbroken success to Khodjend and the Punjab. He wrote his name across the Near and Middle East for two hundred years; and yet his work was ephemeral, in that the Empire which he left, even in the strong hands of the early Seleukids, was dying on its feet from the first generation.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Essay

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After Phillip died Alexander, with the support of Macedonian army quickly consolidated power over Macedonia. After Phillip’s death many conquered nations became rebellious as they seek a way for independence. After Alexander restored peace in Greece, he prepared to conquer Asia, which is known as the Battle of Granicus after Macedonians defeated the Persians; Alexander led his army to South Asia Minor. The Greek costal cities and the Greek commander gave great resistance but at the end Alexander defeated and conquered Asia Minor. After his victory in Asia Minor Alexander turned toward the Gordium north to Central Asia Minor, the young king slashed the knot which was home of the famous Gordian Knot. Alexander defeated the Persian army and took over Syria next he established Alexandria the capital as he conquered Egypt. After conquering Egypt he went ruled over Persia and Babylonian. As he moved through Persia he began to prepare to conquer India. As Alexander invaded India, Punjab, and Alexander’s greatest battle were in India against King Pours the most powerful Indian rulers. After defeating and capturing Pours Alexander allowed him to rule over his territory. At this point Macedonian army was exhausted and wanted to return home which Alexander agreed upon. Making it only back to Babylon, Alexander became very sick and suddenly died. Leaving a great legacy behind him, he…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays