Preview

Is Alexander The Great Really Truly Great?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
362 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Alexander The Great Really Truly Great?
Alexander the Great was a Macedonian king. He was a great conqueror, but some believe that he was ruthless in doing so. He had many successful conquests which led him to become one of the most powerful leaders of all of the ancient world. However, there is much controversy of whether Alexander the Great deserved the title ‘Great.’ But, based on my knowledge, Alexander the Great was truly ‘great’ because he was an astounding military leader, he was merciful, and respectful to the peoples he conquered.
It is no lie that Alexander the Great was a great military leader. He studied battle strategies with military leaders before him, and it aided him in commanding his armies against empires like Persia. In this campaign particularly, it showed his


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Does Alexander the Great Deserve the Title? Alexander the Great, King of Macedon, deserves the title because he was a very powerful man who conquered throughout his life. One of his greatest accomplishments was he spread the Greek culture and language throughout many parts of the world. He took on the position of the King after his father passed away and was able to also accomplish the expansion of his father's empire.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Alexander the great died, he was given the title "the great" due to his success in conquering Europe. People thought he made many great to change Europe. Was that really the reason he was given the title the great? What goals do you have to achieve in order you can receive the tile of "the great"? Someone great should be a leader that contributed to the society greatly and made a significant achievement to change the world and make the way we live today better. He should be someone who is respected by others and also pays respect to others. One should be also kind hearted. Alexander did succeed those goals therefore, should not receive the title "the great".…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the great was hailed by many historians as one of the greatest kings of his time. Because of his greatness he earned the title of alexander the great. I believe, that with all of the things that Alexander did for the Greek empire, he definitely deserves this title. He was able to acquire much more land, he stopped the largest rebellion in greek history, and, under his rule, great cities were created that mixed many cultures to create great cities. Based upon all of the gathered evidence, I think that his title is well deserved.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When he was fighting the Persians he was heavily outnumbered but still managed to defeat the army because he had cornered them and scared the king into running which led to his victory. Also when fighting the Indian kings he used the monsoons and Indian elephants against the opposing militaries. He had his men kill the elephants riders so that they panicked and caused more damage to their own military than to Alexander's. These prove that he was very wise in his military tactics and a huge reason to earn him the status of great.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The writer agrees with Denise that Alexander the Great led his troops to win several battles .However, the writer believes that Alexander the Great was both effective and efficient in this battle by the way he used his strategy and planning against King Darius troops.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that Alexander the Great,was a villain when his dad was alive,but when his dad died he became a hero.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander was great because he conquered a country in the years 333BC, 332BC, 331BC, 331BC, 330BC, 327BC, 324BC and 323BC. This demonstrates that he was great because he used tactics that would defeat enemies. An example of a tactic he used is phalanx. Phalanx means “a body of Macedonian infantry drawn up in close order with shields touching and long spears overlapping”. This was good because he could easily besiege cities which helped him take over the Mediterranean. My own research shows that Alexander the Great took power over the countries Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Palestine, Egypt, northern Afghanistan and Iraq. This shows how Alexander the Great was so prodigious.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was only stopped by his exposed men who forced him to return home. His military expertise can be found in the battle of Issus(333 B.C.E) against the persians. During the battle Alexander had started to lose and he almost lost, but in the chaos the king of the persians ran away and they all started to retreat. This gave Alexander the chance and he took it, And he crushed the persians. One of the strategies he would use was to split up his army into three groups and flank the enemy from almost all sides leaving then nowhere to run. Although he was a great military leader he did have his faults and one of them was he was ruthless. It is recorded that he slaterd all males, and enslaves 20,000 women and children, and also let his troops destroy what was left of thebes after he invaded…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the great is a villain not, a hero. Alexander lied,cheated,frightened,and killed in his time of rule,if he did all of these things why is he called Alexander the Great? Alexander killed millions of innocent people he also made millions of people scared of him,“In 327 BCE, with the Persian Empire firmly under his control, Alexander turned his attention to India. He had some victories before reaching the Ganges river, which he intended to cross in order to conquer more of India”.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great. The ruler of Greece from 356-323 B.C.E. He walked right into military and political aspects. Alexander was an awesome young man and wanted the world to know that he would become just as great of a ruler as his father. It was a must that once he gained the power that all should know he was competent in his work. Alexander will forever be recognized for being a dynamic ruler to the people of Greece. For that alone he leaves behind a legacy that will never fade from history.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What does it mean to be GREAT? The Webster’s dictionary defines the word great as notably large in size, predominant, or remarkable. The Oxford’s dictionary defines the word great as, of ability, quality, or eminence, considerably above average. Alexander the 3rd’s greatness has been questioned in the past and even scholars have long debated the question was Alexander the Great really Great? But one must ask how his legend has survived for thousands of years and his name well known? Many would venture to say that Alexander was great because he was able to rule his father’s kingdom at a very young age. He was able to build an army and conquer several cities in a short amount of time. Others would argue that he was not great because he was known for the unnecessary slaughter of innocent people, murdered his friends and it was suggested that he participated in the assassination of his father King Phillip although never proven.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alexander the Great, or Alexander III of Macedon, was the son Phillip II, the king of Macedon, who lived in 323-356 B.C., and succeeded the throne and army after the assassination of his father. Alexander was best known for his creation of the Macedonian empire, and for his tactics on expansion, and his campaign that lasted 10 years. He is contributed with leading his armies in the infamous Phalanx formation, and for the creation of the Delian league. Although his is an iconic figure in Greek history, the question remains, should Alexander be considered great? Was he really great? Maybe not, but Alexander did possess some qualities that were indeed great.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Document B highlights a battle in which Alexander is fighting against another civilization. In Document B it states “When Alexander saw this, he [decided to] move his troops in all different directions so that Porus would keep puzzled... Alexander then threw his cavalry in a circle around the entire force, and ordered the infantry to lock shields, to group tightly and to advance as a phalanx.” When Alexander decided to change the way he positioned his troops to confuse the Porus it shows that he used strategy to change the playing field to help him. Alexander knew that by doing this his rivals would be expecting one thing and would be receiving another. By using a unique method Alexander can secure a win for himself in a smart and efficient way, highlighting a trait that shows one's greatness. The evidence found in Document A and B show that Alexander shows the strong understanding of strategy, therefore, showing he has a trait of greatness.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander's empire was 2,000,000 miles big. Alexander was born in 356 B.C.E in Macedonia. His father was king Philip of Macedonia, and his mother was Olympia. They hired a philosopher Aristotle to teach him After his father was assassinated He became king, and took his father's plan to conquer Persia.(BGE). Was Alexander really great? Alexander was great for at least three reasons intelligence, creativity, caring for others.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When people think of Alexander the Great how do they think of him? Do people interpret him as great or just a big jerk? History wrote Alexander the Great down as, well great, but is this really the truth? Or are most of the time people with these self proclaimed titles just jerks with over inflamed egos? In social studies class, we watched three very different videos about Alexander the Great. Each video portrayed Alexander in different ways. One of the videos portrayed him as vain, but very powerful. Another portrayed him as a kind, gracious, and well great king. The people in this video thought of him like a God.The final video portrayed him a very different light that is different than how most people see Alexander the Great. This final video portrayed him as a evil, ruthless killer, with all of humanity's worst traits manifested in him. In my personal opinion Alexander the Great was not at all great. He doesn’t deserve his title of great. It would almost be like giving Hitler the title of great (which in no way was Hitler great). The three videos helped me to determine whether Alexander the Great was bad or great.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays