Preview

How Does Alexander The Great Deserve His Title

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
688 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Does Alexander The Great Deserve His Title
Alexander the great was hailed by many historians as one of the greatest kings of his time. Because of his greatness he earned the title of alexander the great. I believe, that with all of the things that Alexander did for the Greek empire, he definitely deserves this title. He was able to acquire much more land, he stopped the largest rebellion in greek history, and, under his rule, great cities were created that mixed many cultures to create great cities. Based upon all of the gathered evidence, I think that his title is well deserved. To begin, let’s discuss his ability to acquire land for the greek culture. One of his most widely seen accomplishments, was his ability to conquer the entirety of persia. Prior to Alexander’s rise …show more content…
This uprising was known as the Theban Uprising, because of where it took place, and those involved. Thebe’s was a city inside of greece that did not believe in, nor did they want, Alexander as their ruler. Because of this, and the fact that they were treated poorly by alexander's father when he was their ruler they decided to rebel. What they did was wrong because of the fact that alexander allowed them to continue practicing their own culture, and allowed them to continue believing in whatever they wanted to believe in. Nevertheless, they rebelled anyway. When Alexander was notified of the Rebellion he immediately rallied 30,000 troops to help him take back the city. Using his strong knowledge of the military he was able to successfully take back the city. While the city was burned down afterward, many believe that it was not Alexander's fault. Alexander still allowed the city to thrive, and let some city officials stay in power. Alexander did choose to leave behind some troops as they help prevent another rebellion, and those troops he left behind, of their own accord, burnt down the city. I believe that because of Alexander's ability to take the city, and because of his respect of Thebaine culture even after the rebellion, he deserves his title as Alexander the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Does Alexander the Great Deserve the Title? Alexander the Great, King of Macedon, deserves the title because he was a very powerful man who conquered throughout his life. One of his greatest accomplishments was he spread the Greek culture and language throughout many parts of the world. He took on the position of the King after his father passed away and was able to also accomplish the expansion of his father's empire.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now, instead of simply discussing his most glorious battle and successful expansion of his empire by overthrowing the Persian Empire. And although they were a major success to his rising to power. People must be able to understand exactly how even after defeating his enemies, Alexander ran these new additions to his empire and effected them through cultural influence. While Alexander was exceedingly bright, some may have doubted how he chose to run them. Even after the overthrowing of Darius III, Alexander still wanted to add more to his empire. He even went as far as India to overthrow, which only failed due to homesick soldiers. Thus, this had to be Alexander's greatest flaw, he didn't know when enough was enough. Now, back to subject at…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander began his invasion of Persia in 334 BC and he had to leave a large amount of troops in Greece to maintain control over his city states, this caused Alexander to only have 35,000 fighters with him when he began to pillage and take over Persian land. Alexander was greatly outnumbered compared to his Persian foes, never the less, he was able to cut through them. He never lost a battle. Things that may have contributed to his success was Alexander was a strong leader. He was present for every battle and rode with the cavalry on the front lines, with his trusted horse,…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Alexander the great died, he was given the title "the great" due to his success in conquering Europe. People thought he made many great to change Europe. Was that really the reason he was given the title the great? What goals do you have to achieve in order you can receive the tile of "the great"? Someone great should be a leader that contributed to the society greatly and made a significant achievement to change the world and make the way we live today better. He should be someone who is respected by others and also pays respect to others. One should be also kind hearted. Alexander did succeed those goals therefore, should not receive the title "the great".…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Alexander Succeed

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander achieved many things that would be considered unachievable by many in that era. However, with his achievements came mistakes, or as some might say a God like complex. No matter, whichever way you look at it, he succeeded where others failed. Alexander wanted to be greater than his father, and he certainly achieved this goal. However, Alexander had a different way of doing things, he did not want to just conquer lands and take over the inhabitant’s lifestyle, but instead he tried to teach them new ideas and a new way of living.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander was great because he conquered a country in the years 333BC, 332BC, 331BC, 331BC, 330BC, 327BC, 324BC and 323BC. This demonstrates that he was great because he used tactics that would defeat enemies. An example of a tactic he used is phalanx. Phalanx means “a body of Macedonian infantry drawn up in close order with shields touching and long spears overlapping”. This was good because he could easily besiege cities which helped him take over the Mediterranean. My own research shows that Alexander the Great took power over the countries Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Palestine, Egypt, northern Afghanistan and Iraq. This shows how Alexander the Great was so prodigious.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He sent his men in different directions to throw off Porus’s army. As Peter Green wrote, Alexander marched down the coast of the Mediterranean, and various cities gave up without a fight. They came to a city named Tyre, which held them off for seven months. Alexander’s arrogance got the best of him and he killed 2,000 men. He sold 30,000 survivors into…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great. The ruler of Greece from 356-323 B.C.E. He walked right into military and political aspects. Alexander was an awesome young man and wanted the world to know that he would become just as great of a ruler as his father. It was a must that once he gained the power that all should know he was competent in his work. Alexander will forever be recognized for being a dynamic ruler to the people of Greece. For that alone he leaves behind a legacy that will never fade from history.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander ascended to the Macedonian throne. He soon showed his power when the large city of…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the “not-so-great” was a psychotic maniac with a huge ego. He was conceded and had absolutely no concern for others. For example, when Alexander’s army was struggling across the hot, dry desert of sand, he could’ve taken them around the desert, so they didn’t have to suffer. (doc.D) Also, every new place Alexander went to he founded a new city and named it after himself….. Alexandria!!! In total he named eleven cities after himself. Because he was spoiled and everyone treated him like he was royalty at a very young age, he came up with the idea that he was part god and told everyone to treat him that way. (B.E.) There were always consequences for when people tried to stand up against Alexander. One example is in the battle with Tyre, when they refused to surrender, so he wouldn’t let them be and ordered his army to destruct and destroy all of Tyre into little pieces.(Doc.C) Therefore, because of his lack of concern for others and huge ego, he was proven,…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander the Great had what it took to become a great leader. He had culture, intelligence, and bravery. He was a leader who believed in his people and even granted military favors to his army. As a towering figure in ancient history, Alexander came close to conquering the entire civilized world of his day. He was one of the greatest military geniuses in history. (100 Interesting and Amazing Things About Alexander the Great). Alexander had great control in every aspect of his life. The accomplishments of Alexander are still impressive today. Alexander the Great was a man of great honor, military leadership, and excellent battle tactics.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The surrounding Greek city-states which King Phillip had unified under the Corinthian league were seeking to take leadership of the league for themselves. In response, Alexander sent an army to the region of Thessaly to force the the city-states into acknowledging him as leader of the Corinthian league. This leadership was officialized at a meeting in Thermopylae in 336, where treaties with Greek states were reissued, and Alexander was given full control of the Persian conquests.(Alexander The Great, n. d.) Before the newly established king would begin his invasion of Asia Minor, he conquered the Thracian Triballians to secure the Northern Macedonian border. However, at the end of his Thracian campaign, Alexander received word that the city-state Thebes had forced out stationed Macedonian troops, Alexander was quick to respond, and brought a vast army consisting of 3,000 cavalry and 30,000 infantry to Thebes. Three days after Alexander’s army had reached Thebes, the Macedonians led the Massacre of Thebes.(Walbank, n. d.) The genocide in Thebes eliminated a fear of revolt from the Greek city-states and also solidified Alexander’s leadership in the Corinthian league. With Greece completely under Alexander’s control, Alexander was able to devote all of his focus to foreign conquests, and begin building an…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He had the courage and the will to do what no other king has done.His courage contributed greatly to his success hence the name, Alexander The Great. In the Background Essay, it claims that Alexander set off to conquer Persia almost right after he inherited the throne. Most people might think that he was stupid and that he was a madman to try and achieve that. But he did it, he took down the Persian army. Alexander The Great’s legacy spread Hellenization throughout the known world at the time. Hellenization is the spread of Greek culture and language, culture and population. It took a lot of courage and self esteem to be able to spread the Greek language among the conquered lands because he didn’t know if the people would hate it or not be he did it anyway. He could have faced rejection. At the end of it all, Alexander had courage like no other…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What does it mean to be GREAT? The Webster’s dictionary defines the word great as notably large in size, predominant, or remarkable. The Oxford’s dictionary defines the word great as, of ability, quality, or eminence, considerably above average. Alexander the 3rd’s greatness has been questioned in the past and even scholars have long debated the question was Alexander the Great really Great? But one must ask how his legend has survived for thousands of years and his name well known? Many would venture to say that Alexander was great because he was able to rule his father’s kingdom at a very young age. He was able to build an army and conquer several cities in a short amount of time. Others would argue that he was not great because he was known for the unnecessary slaughter of innocent people, murdered his friends and it was suggested that he participated in the assassination of his father King Phillip although never proven.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander has established new colonies and cities, and many of them he named after himself. He has also set up a common currency for his entire realm; even used Greeks, Macedonians, and Persians in his plan to try and unite the East and West. There are many things that have worked to give him the title, Alexander the Great! Of course, he has a few negatives to tag along with his many accomplishments. For example, he had a terrible drinking addiction that really had an effect to the last seven years of his life.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays