Preview

Alexander The Great Sources

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1498 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alexander The Great Sources
The leader of the Macedonian empire in , Alexander the Great was feverishly expanding his empire when in 333 B.C.E he crossed paths with the mighty Persian Empire led by King Darius. The subsequent battles between the two sides are very nuanced and are recanted in different fashions by the different parties. The goal of this analysis is to decipher some of the accounts of the battles and attempt to piece together what the actual events may have been. In this analysis, we will be focusing on four key sources for the battles between Alexander and Darius. The first is the writing of Arrian of Nicomedia in his book ‘The Anabasis of Alexander’. Arrian is a Greek historian who lived within the Roman Empire from 92 to 175 C.E, more than 400 …show more content…
Looking at the text by Arrian, the Zoroastrian Arda Wiraz and the film “In the Footsteps of Alexander the Great”, which is a contemporary film reflecting a modern day historian’s account of the events, we can highlight a few key differences in how these sources reflect the events. One key differences between the sources is how they reflect the way Darius died. In the writing of Arrian the death of Darius occurs after Alexander had “ascertained that be had been arrested and was being conveyed in a covered carriage (“The Anabasis of Alexander 4.11.186-187”) Once discovering this development about Darius Alexander’s army attacked the Persian’s who were now led by Bessus and the vulnerable Darius was assassinated in the carriage where he was held a prisoner. The film tells a similar story including that Darius was held prisoner and died in a covered carriage, but an important conversation is included into the story where Darius tells a Greek solider to relay to Alexander his gratitude for treating his family graciously in captivity and that “he in turn will rule the world just as Darius had done” (In the Footsteps of Alexander). In the Arda Wiraz it is said that Alexander “slew the ruler of Iran”(Arda Wiraz) in reference to Darius, not at all specifying the slaying was done. Another difference between the texts is how they view Alexander. Zoroastrians view Alexander as a horrible man, “the wicked one”(Arda Wiraz) who destroyed their culture while Arrian’s text portrays Alexander as a hero, a man who galvanized others and “recapitulated as modestly as possible his own daring deeds in the various battles” (Anabasis of Alexander 1.7.92) . Lastly, the film shows Alexander in contrasting ways from different aspects of the piece. The films narrator projects Alexander as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Alexander was tempted to chase after Darius, but with his camp being raided and Parmenion surrounded, Alexander ordered his troops back. He then aided to Parmenion and slaughtered the Persians who were coming back from raiding his camp (“Battle of Gaugamela”). With exemplary leading, strategic planning, and patience, Alexander had earned one of the most decisive and stunning victories…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    After defeating the Persian army in the battle at Granicus, the army moved south searching for the main force. The main force was led by the ruler of Persia, Darius. The battle happens in a narrow area between the gulf of Issus and mountains on November 5, 333 BC. The macedonian army used its phalanx, and Alexander used his tactics to adapt to the situation. The army had a phalanx in the center, hypaspists on the right, and companion cavalry with Alexander riding with them on the flank. On the left was a mix of heavy and light cavalry, with an infantry in reserve. Far right in the hills, the army had agrarians, elite javelin soldiers, and cavalry. The Macedonian army advances, protecting their flank. Alexander led an attack of the agrarians, and managed to drive off the heavy infantry. Meanwhile the rest of the macedonian cavalry on that flank drove off the persian cavalry. On the opposite flank, the Persian heavy cavalry succeeding in pushing back the weaker cavalry of the Macedonian army. Alexander responded to this by using his infantry. The Macedonians with this infantry put up a defensive line against a possible breakthrough. As the Persian line advanced, placing their flank in the air, they left themselves vulnerable. The Agrarians continued to pursue heavy infantry, while the cavalry turned on the flank of the infantry. Alexander in this moment saw Darius and advanced toward him. He believed that by…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    At Caspian Gates Darius was left behind on a wagon and assassinated by his own bodyguard because they saw him as incompetent to lead Persia anymore, seeing this Alexander feels sorrow for Darius to be killed by his own men, he gave Darius a royal funeral, by burying him at the capital of persia, Persepolis, along with other previous kings of persia (Yenne…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now, instead of simply discussing his most glorious battle and successful expansion of his empire by overthrowing the Persian Empire. And although they were a major success to his rising to power. People must be able to understand exactly how even after defeating his enemies, Alexander ran these new additions to his empire and effected them through cultural influence. While Alexander was exceedingly bright, some may have doubted how he chose to run them. Even after the overthrowing of Darius III, Alexander still wanted to add more to his empire. He even went as far as India to overthrow, which only failed due to homesick soldiers. Thus, this had to be Alexander's greatest flaw, he didn't know when enough was enough. Now, back to subject at…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The writer agrees with Denise that Alexander the Great led his troops to win several battles .However, the writer believes that Alexander the Great was both effective and efficient in this battle by the way he used his strategy and planning against King Darius troops.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexanders respect of other people's beliefs was one of the biggest reasons he is considered great. While other conquerors in this time period, like the persians, would try to destroy and get rid of other people's cultures Alexander would study and learn from them. He did this to such an extent in Egypt that they even referred to him as a god and pharaoh. In other places he would study their beliefs, and try to understand them as a people, and he may have been doing this to learn how to control them, but based on his character it is more likely that he did it so learn how to respect them.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Document C illustrates how Alexander was able to defeat the Tyre which was a self proclaimed “unconquerable city” because it was built on an island protected with high walls. “ The great city…. Was now utterly destroyed. Her king, Azimilik, and various other notables, including envoys from carthage, had taken refuge in the temple of Melkart, and Alexander spared their lives. The remaining survivors, some 30,000 in numbers, he sold into slavery, Two thousand men of military age were crucified.” (Doc C) Although some might argue he isn't great because the deaths of two thousand military man are quite brutal he did it out of pure leadership in order to finish the battle he started. Alexander stepped up as a leader and was able to lead men into a battle and defeat the unconquerable city. Also In Document C, another battle or march, Alexander shows leadership, “Alexander had ordered that all [expect] those who sought sanctuary were to be slain” (Document C). This shows Alexander was great by leadership because he made the big decision for his troops on what to follow out, even though it was a rough game plan, he stepped up and took charge.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander accomplished many feats thought to be unattainable. “Alexander and his army marched for 11 years over 22,000 miles and never lost a battle against the strongest foes of his time” (Smith 1). He gained so much land in such a short amount of time from the biggest and strongest empire at the time. Alexander made all of this possible by leading the army through many of these battles. People might say that the Persian Empire was already beginning to fall (Smith 1), but even though they might have begun to weaken they were still the most powerful empire at the time.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alison Fong Ms. Wetzel English II Honors, Period 3 20 October 2014 Alexander the Great: The Military Genius Imagine crossing thousands of miles of scorching desert, rugged mountains and endless plains on both foot and horseback while commanding and maneuvering an army. Throughout history, there have been legends of heroes facing impossible trials. Alexander the Great is a legendary figure that did the impossible. Leading thousands of men across a continent is challenging enough on its own, but Alexander the Great took this challenge even further. He took the most demanding and laborious paths possible during his campaign to expand his empire, and he succeeded (Romey).…

    • 2296 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, Alexander was very smart because, he accepted the offer of Ada and established her as queen of all Caria and Halicarnassus to sustain his power. In 333 B.C, he fought against Darius in the Battle of Issus and defeated him in that battle and forced him to flee. Alexander keeps expanding his region based on his well-trained army and their support .In 332 B.C, he wins siege of Tyre and attacks Gaza and shows his dominance to other kings. By 331 B.C, Alexander found new city called Alexandria and won battle of Gaugamela against Darius. As a result, Alexander’s claim to be king of Persia was sealed with blood and iron (Roberts0). In between, there was tension growing in his empire, Cletius was military commander and saved Alexander’s life in battle of Gaugamela started talking inappropriate about Alexander’s family in drunk condition. Due to Claudius’s bad comment on Alexander’s mother, Alexander killed Cletius and felt regret afterwards.(Robert 86) . After Alexander’s capture in 327 B.C. of Sogdian Rock, a teenager daughter names Roxanne came there and he fell in love at first sight. Afterwards, Alexander and Roxanne had a traditional wedding. Furthermore, having conquered Persia heartland, Alexander goes eastward and fought for seven years. He kept expanding his region by not only pushing his army eastern parts…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian empire at its peak has long been seen as one of the largest wholes during the classical era, and few have rivaled its size. The land that Alexander the Great was able to conquer, however, was one of the few that served as an appropriate challenge. Around the time of 338 B.C.E through 323 B.C.E., Alexander's collected mass was a whole. Of a Greek origin, Alexander was taught by Aristotle, the great philosopher, and it can be inferred that he used the strategic methods learned, among other things, to assist him during his expansion. It was short lived, however, when he died of an unknown cause at an early age of thirty-three. Even though his empire crumbled, his legacy lived on. Multiple cities, strongly influenced by Alexander, erected,…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In defense to Alexander, it could be put into perspective that Alexander did some of his most questionable actions to prove his political validity and power to his followers. For instance, when Philotas is informed by Dymnus of the conspiracy against Alexander begins to suspect that Philotas is behind the plot, he tortures him and eventually orders for his father Parmenio to be assassinated. While it may seem inhumane to have someone executed on such little evidence, had Alexander not ordered him to be tortured, it could have led to Alexander's army questioning Alexander's power. This could have also lead to various more threats on Alexander's life. Suppose Philotas…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The three main causes of the civil war, infringement on civil liberties, infringement on states' rights, and the collapse of the two-party system made the conflict between North and South almost impossible to resolve.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Alexander portrayed by Arrian in his The Campaigns of Alexander, is an interesting and complex Alexander, a character that slowly grows, matures and evolves throughout his adventures in new lands. Arrian is able to give an in depth description of the battles Alexander took part in as well as the lands he traveled to, while at the same time describing Alexander’s character. He is able to describe how Alexander goes from an over-confident youth, with great dreams of grandeur, to an adult who remains almost the same but more wise, and then finally a sad shadow of his former self who finally dies in depression.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (the curtain opens behind the narrator and the scene inside the palace is taking place)…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays