Alice in Wonderland - Nonsense?
<br><center>I wrote this paper in High school. It got an A. With use of this essay cite works to "Kristin's People Places and Things" Tewksbury, MA: Free paper Inc., 1999.</center>
<br>
<br>
<br>Lewis Carroll's works Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There are by many people considered nonsense books for children. Of course, they are, but they are also much more. Lewis Carroll had a great talent of intertwining nonsense and logic, and therefore creating sense within nonsense. If you look past the nonsense you can find a new meaning other than the one you found completing your third grade book report. You find that the books are full of references and parallel aspects of Victorian Society such as topics of etiquette, education, and prejudice, and through these topic's is shown a child's ability to survive in a hostile world. By this last statement I am referring to Cohen's comment that "Wonderland" (published in1865) captures "the disappointments, fears, and bewilderment that all children encounter in their dealings with authoritarian, pompous and mystifying adults" which Wonderland seems to have no deficiency of.
<br>
<br>Throughout the story Carroll portrays his views on the education of the times. He make's "morals and tales of obedience"(Brown,May Lee) seem nonsensical by the character of the Duchess and Alice's preoccupation with her lessons. The Duchess keeps insisting to Alice that "Everything's got a moral, if only you can find it"(Wonderland, 70), but with morals like "mustard and dogs both bite"(Wonderland, 70) you can see this rule is not quite right. "The absurdity of such a character"(Brown,May Lee) trying to teach Alice anything is a parody of what Carroll thought about the lessons children were being taught. Also
<br>
<br>"Alice refers to her lessons and her education, usually very proud of the learning that she has acquired. It seems, however, that the information that she remembers from her lessons is
<br>
<br>
<br>Lewis Carroll's works Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There are by many people considered nonsense books for children. Of course, they are, but they are also much more. Lewis Carroll had a great talent of intertwining nonsense and logic, and therefore creating sense within nonsense. If you look past the nonsense you can find a new meaning other than the one you found completing your third grade book report. You find that the books are full of references and parallel aspects of Victorian Society such as topics of etiquette, education, and prejudice, and through these topic's is shown a child's ability to survive in a hostile world. By this last statement I am referring to Cohen's comment that "Wonderland" (published in1865) captures "the disappointments, fears, and bewilderment that all children encounter in their dealings with authoritarian, pompous and mystifying adults" which Wonderland seems to have no deficiency of.
<br>
<br>Throughout the story Carroll portrays his views on the education of the times. He make's "morals and tales of obedience"(Brown,May Lee) seem nonsensical by the character of the Duchess and Alice's preoccupation with her lessons. The Duchess keeps insisting to Alice that "Everything's got a moral, if only you can find it"(Wonderland, 70), but with morals like "mustard and dogs both bite"(Wonderland, 70) you can see this rule is not quite right. "The absurdity of such a character"(Brown,May Lee) trying to teach Alice anything is a parody of what Carroll thought about the lessons children were being taught. Also
<br>
<br>"Alice refers to her lessons and her education, usually very proud of the learning that she has acquired. It seems, however, that the information that she remembers from her lessons is