Preview

Alien + Sedition Acts

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1948 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alien + Sedition Acts
10/22/2013
APUSH
Alien and Sedition Acts DBQ In June and July of 1798, the Alien and Sedition acts passed through congress, which created dispute between the Federalists and Republicans due to the four factors of Political Ideology, Domestic Policies, Constitutionality and Foreign Affairs. Political Ideology as the two disputing factions, the Federalists and Republicans fought profusely over the passing of these acts, one side in support, and the other against. Then Domestic Policies as these acts tried to restrict immigration laws that brought the Republican Party in an uproar. Constitutionality as many questioned the validity of the Constitution as the Sedition act placed limitations upon the first amendment. Lastly, Foreign Affairs as the XYZ affair sparked a dispute between the pro-French Republicans and the Federalists who refused to apologize to the French for Adams anti-French remarks. The debate over the Alien and Sedition acts of 1798 portrayed bitter controversies over four factors of Political Ideology, Domestic Policy, Constitutionality and Foreign Affairs. Political Ideology during this era split into two factions, of Republicans, Led by Thomas Jefferson, and the Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton and John Adams, who held the presidency in this period on the Federalists side. These two sides fought tirelessly against each other in regards to the Alien and Sedition acts. As portrayed in Document C, it reveals the ill-disposed feelings between the two parties, as Thomas Jefferson writes to France this: “Therefore I protest to you I am not of the party of Federalists,” what Thomas Jefferson writes here explains his political thoughts of the Party, as he would not want to be mistaken for a Federalist, as he wishes to clear the table with the French and does not agree with Adams’ decision to not apologize to France. But then in Document D, Hamilton reveals his dislike for the opposing party of Republicans as he states in a letter, “ But I

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thesis: The political and economic views of Hamiltonian Federalists and Jeffersonian Republicans differed in terms of centralized or state governments, acts passed by congress, American liberty, and industries. Later on when the Republican party dominated the government after the War of 1812, their original ideals started to blend in with Federalists’ and the lines blurred.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thomas Jefferson first saw the French Revolutionaries, the Jacobins, and a likened them to the Republican Patriots of the American Revolution. Because of their beginnings with establishing a free constitution, and the sheer desire to become independent, it is only expectable that these connections would be made within the American’s minds. Despite originally seeing the two groups a part of the same sect, the violence that erupted from the French Revolution, leading up to and during the Reign of Terror caused Jefferson to change his views towards the Jacobins.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Thomas Jefferson became president, he began to change his view on economics drastically. Jefferson and Madison, both republicans, talked about limited government. However when they served as President, both men excersized powers not granted in the constitution. Jefferson originially believed that the country would never exist in harmony as long as the Federalists supported ideas not stated in the Constitution. (A) Despite this, Jefferson purchased large amounts of western land from France in the Lousiana Purchase without senates approval. The Federalists believed this…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton and Jefferson were chosen Apart from it being his priority to keep positive relationships with other countries, Jefferson kept good communication with France after Genet’s misfortune. Even after “the Terror” in France, Jefferson stood by the beliefs and actions of France. Hamilton was a Federalist that in the now would be referred to Republicans. The ideas were similar to those of Europe, allowing for Federal Government to have more control and a monarchy control.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two political parties of Federalists and Republicans differed to a great extent and centered on domestic and foreign policy differences, reached their highest point of disagreement upon the passage of the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1978, in purpose that one party would remain in control by limiting the power and growth of the other party (Doc S). Under the threat of war with France, Congress in 1798 passed four laws in an effort to strengthen the Federal government, known as the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798. These acts did not permit anyone to criticize the government at all, through writing, or any other shape, form, or fashion as if their views on government did not matter at all (Doc B). Many people wished that acts would be executed for they knew that it would divide the nation that was trying to become one (Doc O). It also extended the time to become an American citizen, since the Federalists believed that…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which made their rivalry even more intense. Hamilton was an intense Federalist in favor of a very powerful federal government. Madison was a Democratic-Republican, so he was in favor of states rights. Burr was a little different, he mostly cared about how to gain power and once joined the other party to improve his chances of becoming president he stayed with Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans for most of his political career. The first rift between Hamilton and Jefferson started when they were selected to serve as cabinet members, Hamilton as Treasury secretary and Jefferson as Secretary of State. Since they had such wildly different viewpoints they often fought. Hamilton, a very egotistical person, sometimes even called a narcissist, attacked Jefferson’s character to demean him during cabinet meetings. Burr and Hamilton were both very well known public figures who were even friends until Burr ran for a Senate seat and beat out Hamilton's father in law. In the article Mr. Kennedy explains how he believes this wasn't a direct act of aggression to Hamilton, as some historians believe, showing just one claim of bias in this analysis. Burr and Jefferson's conflict started in the election of 1800. To make it brief, The voting process was different back then. Jefferson and Burr tied for the most votes and instead of stepping aside for Jefferson, Burr made an attempt at the Presidency. And in order to break the tie, Hamilton endorsed Jefferson, which made electors swing their vote to Jefferson, breaking the tie. This was just one reason Burr challenged Hamilton to duel. Hamilton saw Jefferson as the lesser of two evils, even going as far as saying Burr was a “mischievous enemy.” The 18th century equivalent of calling someone a liar and a fraud on television today. These three men disliked each other a great deal and showed it to the press, and to one…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. Two men who have played a major role in shaping our nation. Like most influential men of that time, their ideas did not always flow in the same direction. Although Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton butted heads, they established many of today’s ideals. This essay will describe Jefferson and Hamilton, describe how they shaped the political divide as well as why we credit them with the beginning of the two political parties of today.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What light do these documents shed on the debate between Federalists (supporters of Hamilton) and Democratic- Republicans (supporters of Jefferson)?…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Jefferson often showed a strong dislike for the Federalist laws and programs, when he took office he left many of the Federalist programs intact, and except for revoking the excise tax, the Hamiltonian system was mostly left as it was. However, this act of Jefferson’s went against many of the political beliefs held by his party and himself. Jefferson and Hamilton’s philosophies differed greatly in that Jefferson adhered to a weak central government, with most of the power in the hands of the states. He believed that the federal government’s power should be restrained and limited, so that it would not be able to become tyrannical or try and undermine the power of the states and the people.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With respect to the Constitution, Jeffersonian Republicans were casually characterized as strict constructionists who opposed the broad constructionism of the Federalist Party. By the end of John Adams’ presidential administration in 1800, two political parties emerged with opposite philosophical views of the Constitution; to shift once the democratic-republicans took office. When the revolution of 1800 propelled the democratic-republicans into office, Jefferson and Madison found Alexander Hamilton's financial structure to be advantageous. The “necessary and proper” clause of the Constitution was expanded by both Jefferson and Madison to address threats to national security. In order to counter the democratic-republicans, the federalists resorted…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The origins of partisan politics can be traced back to the 1790’s during George Washington’s presidency. It stemmed from a widening gap in in the ideological framework of the government and the vision for the future United State of America. Alexander Hamilton, the Secretary of the Treasury, felt it was necessary to create a strong central government. A government that favored the wealthy at the expense of farmers and average citizens. This group who showed loyalty to the national government, called themselves the Federalists. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison held a different view of the future of the republic, one that empowered the states more than the national government. The main concern was that a national government that held too…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Controversy of the Alien and sedition acts In 1796, the federalist, John Adams, was elected as the second president of the United States. At this time the french revolution had been going on for seven bloody years. the federalist party was antipathetic toward the revolution but the ever popular democratic republican party continued, as they always did, to espouse it. America under George Washington had professed neutrality in the French Revolution but the French disregarded this and attacked American commerce ships.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1798 the Alien and Sedition act was made. This act was completely against the constitution in all ways that you look at it. People might disagree because they did not want to many people coming into the country that could hurt it. I do agree with this but not every person that come to the country didn’t want to do bad things. Some people come to live a new lifestyle because their old country was not the best. This is why this act was one of the worst ones and should have never been made.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the European enlightenment of the eighteenth century, educated men of the aristocracy began to shun the traditional Puritan mindset. Instead they chose to reform society and advance knowledge through scientific discovery and natural laws of the physical universe instead of the spiritual universe. Among these educated men was Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson had a rationalist mindset. He believed that men could control their own destiny, and natural law shaped society, as opposed to the spiritual view of the puritans. This view did not bode well with evangelical Protestants. In 1790 the federal party led by Washington and Adams openly opposed his views, stating that Jefferson was an “infidel, an apologist for slavery, and a lover of French revolutionary excess.” (Couvares 76-3) and in fact history had already become politicized.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In times of war there are many different opinions expressed by the people of the country. Some people would support the decision of war, while some people would strongly agree with the concept of war. The question is, is there a limit to what is allowed and is not allowed when discussing opinions of war. In June 1917 Congress passed the Espionage Act, and in May 1918 it passed the Sedition Act. Under this act any individual could be fined up to $10,000, and be sentenced to 20 years in jail for interfering with the war effort or for saying anything disloyal, profane, or abusive about the government or the war effort. The problem with these laws was that they violated the First Amendment. It ended up leading to over 2,000 prosecutions for loosely defined antiwar activities, and over half of them resulted in convictions. Any newspaper or magazine that opposed the war or made fun of or criticized the war effort would lose their mailing privileges. Another occurrence regarding this Act was when The House of Representatives refused to seat Victor Berger, a socialist congressman from Wisconsin, because of his antiwar views. Another example was when Columbia University fired a distinguished psychologist because he opposed the war. The Espionage and Sedition Acts targeted socialists and labor leaders. Eugene V. Debs was handed a ten-year prison sentence for speaking out against eh war and the draft. The anarchist Emma Goldman received a two-year prison sentence and a $10,000 fine for organizing the No Conscription…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics