Preview

Alternative Dispute Resolution in the legal system

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
654 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alternative Dispute Resolution in the legal system
ADR is often seen as an effective way for parties to settle a dispute outside of the confines of a court of law. ADR allows people to gain access to the law who would otherwise be left in the dark. By using ADR, parties can come to an agreement privately and remain on good terms with each other.
Many individuals struggle to gain access to the law for reasons such as cost, social standing and fear of discrimination. No one person can understand every law however we are expected to be aware of the laws that regulate our activities on a daily basis. Individuals who have emigrated from other countries may not understand or be familiar with our legal system which bases itself on the English legal system, which has a different structure to the legal systems of many of the immigrant's homelands. People who have lived their whole lives in Australia may also be ignorant of the law and regions of legal assistance as they may have little or no contact with lawyers, courts and the legal system itself.
ADR comes in many forms. Mediation is an ADR process where an independent third party, the mediator, assists the people in dispute to identify the disputed issues, as well as develop options, consider alternatives and try to reach an agreement. Conciliation is an ADR process where an independent third party, the conciliator, also helps people in a dispute to identify the disputed issues, develop options, consider alternatives and try to reach an agreement. A conciliator may have professional expertise in the subject matter in dispute and will generally provide advice about the issues and options for resolution. However, a conciliator will not make a judgment or decision about the dispute. Arbitration is another ADR process where the parties present arguments and evidence to an independent third party, the arbitrator, who makes a determination. Arbitration is particularly useful where the subject matter is highly technical, or where the parties seek greater confidentiality

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is ADR? ADR Approaches of Arguments Resolution Negotiation Why Negotiation? Proceedings Implication…

    • 397 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most common forms of ADR which are available are – Negotiation (It is a simple procedure in which parties involved in dispute discuss with each other to reach a voluntary settlement.),Mediation (In this method, the parties use a mediator to propose a settlement of their dispute), Arbitration ( In it, the parties chooses a third party to hear evidence and testimony and then decide the dispute), Mini-trial (In it, lawyers from both parties present their case to representatives of each party so that parties can know strengths and weaknesses of their cases.), Fact-finding(the parties employs a neutral third party who act as fact-finder for the investigation of case and the information investigated by Fact-finder can be used in negotiating settlement.), Using a Judicial Referee (With the parties agreement, the court may appoint a judicial referee to conduct a private trial and give a judgment and their decisions stand as judgments of the court). (Cheeseman,…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bus Law 531 Week 1

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) over the years has grown in popularity with over 90% of all cases resolved through some form of ADR. The advantages of ADR over trial include such things, as it is less formal and less intimidating. ADR has a more rapid resolution and is less expensive and is normally heard by an arbitrator or mediator. ADR enables parties to address underlying issues and interests. It permits more creative and flexible solutions. Trial by comparison is a more formal process. Traditional litigation requires that a complaint is filed in the court and the plaintiff most respond. This is followed by a pre-trial and a trial in which each party is allowed to present their case and it is settled either by jury or a judge. Trials are also a slower process and require a higher amount of time, more expensive, and as well as stress and emotional disarray. In traditional litigation businesses may get certain documents, testimony, and other evidence, which may not apply to ADR…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * ;Encourages resolution of claims and dispute matters at the time of arousal through, through cooperative administration and communication…

    • 2001 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law/531 Adr Analysis

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The benefit of ADR, allows a legal issue to be resolved without having to spend as much money and time as a traditional means. Arbitration, collaborative law, mediation and negotiation are a few of the alternative means to resolve disputes. For the majority of the ADR process, there is no need for a judge or jury. Initially, an ADR method should be chosen, with a neutral individual in charge of facilitation. For the benefit of avoiding a public trial, a…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Joe Brown was interviewed by Supervisor McGrath and hired as a security officer with Abel Security Company, on Thursday, 16 August, 2007. Supervisor McGrath verbally discussed the Post Order and the uniform policy with Mr. Brown. Supervisor McGrath informed his was the cost for the uniform cap and uniform shirt would be. Mr. Brown said that he understood and he had no problem with the deduction being taken from his first check.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another strategies of resolutions through in the ADR process in the situation of problems in the Learning Team is the mediation. Team member with current or previous involvement in disputes are not able to intervene as arbitrator. According to "San Diego Court” (2014), Mediation is a confidential, non-binding process in which a trained mediator facilitates communication between disputants and assists parties in reaching a mutually acceptable resolution of all or part of their dispute. The mediator is not the decision-maker and does not resolve the dispute, the parties do. However a mediator is often able to more fully explore the parties' underlying interests, needs and priorities ("San Diego Court ", 2014). The ADR Clause is a faster process and more effective that a litigation.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mediators do not give a final verdict on the case, but only serve as a resource of understanding between both parties. In the case that there is not an agreement, the parties can look to other avenues to resolve the legal issue, whether that be another ADR option, or court. In the same manner, Arbitration also uses a third party to handle disputes. When each party agrees to arbitration, usually an expert in the field is called to facilitate the process. Their responsibility is to listen to what each side has to present, and based on the evidence and information, provide a verdict for the case. Some of these cases can be binding meaning that a decision made by the arbitrator is final. In any other instances, if the case is not binding, then either party has the right to go to court if the verdict is not satisfactory (Arbitration and mediation, n.d.). Sometimes I hybrid version of these two processes, known as Med-Arb, may be the best approach. At the beginning of the process a mediator is established, but if an agreement cannot be reached through mediation, then the mediator takes position as an arbitrator and imposes a binding decision for…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The definition of ADR is an acronym for alternative dispute resolution. Alternative dispute resolution is a program put in place to help resolve civil cases reach an agreement prior to entering the court. This program helps the court and individuals reach an agreement in a cost effective manner. It is also a requirement in certain counties across the nation in order to avoid costly litigations and give chance to resolution without involving the court.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the name suggests, the adversary system in Australia refers to a method of trial, which involves contestants or adversaries, that is, it is an adversarial approach in attempting to resolve legal issues between two opposing sides. There are five features of the adversary system in Australia; contest; party control; strict rules of evidence and procedures; role of the judge or magistrate and single event trials. The strengths and weaknesses of the adversary system, which has evolved through out history are varied, and as a result the question of whether this system provides justice is often challenged.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Any group or team that works together to achieve a common goal is bound to experience some form of conflict. In the context of a University of Phoenix learning team, settling these disputes in an efficient and quick manner allows the team to be more productive and thereby earn a higher grade. Having some form of resolution process in writing for the team to follow when a dispute does happen will then allow for a more effective learning team.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Learning Team will use alternative methods, when appropriate, to resolve Learning Team disputes. An Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) will provide the possibility of reaching a mutually agreed upon settlement (Townsend, 2003).…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States, a traditional litigation refers to the process of bringing, defending and maintaining a lawsuit (Cheeseman, 2010). Traditional litigation goes through a structured process of answer, discovery trial and jury. Whereas the nontraditional litigation process, alternative dispute resolution, known as ADR is a more flexible, less expensive, not as time consuming, and confidential process. There are several forms of alternative dispute resolution, mediation, arbitration, negotiation, conciliation, mini-trial, fact-finding and utilizing a judicial referee. Arbitration and mediation are similar to where it is a form of negotiation and a neutral party settles the dispute. Negotiation is where the two parties negotiate to settle the dispute. A mini-trial is a shortened version of a traditional litigation trial. Fact-finding situations call for the parties to employ a third party to investigate the facts to come to a resolution. Lastly, a judicial referee is much like a mini-trial but both parties reserve the right to appeal. Ninety percent of cases are resolved through alternative dispute resolution (Harms, 2011). The next several paragraphs will identify risks associated with traditional litigation and the advantages of the alternative dispute resolution in reducing those risks.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theory Dispute Resolution

    • 1954 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I am writing to advice you on the actions you should take that will benefit you the most considering your current situation. After a lot of consideration, we at Sophocles and Plato LLP of Republic Chambers believe that the best way to resolve your dispute with Motor Services (Medway) Ltd would not be through the use of litigation as you stated your intentions in your case file however would be to engage in an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) first, with litigation being a final resort. Our professional opinion noted that mediation would be the best process to use for your specific situation as will give you the best chance to come to a mutual agreement and resolve this dispute without the need for legal intervention. I will now explain why mediation is the best option for you.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, having laws in place facilitates the discussion and resolutions of disputes. In business these resolutions can become very costly to the business, but through methods of dispute resolutions such as alternative dispute resolution (ADR) businesses may remedy the dispute without going through legal battles in a court system. The same applies for disputes in society, as disputes arise, having a guide and understanding of the law allows separate parties to come to a mutual agreement through…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays